Induction differential proof
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove
$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.
I can see how this would happen:
$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$
$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get
$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$
Which in turn would be $k!$
However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?
derivatives proof-writing induction
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove
$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.
I can see how this would happen:
$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$
$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get
$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$
Which in turn would be $k!$
However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?
derivatives proof-writing induction
Its not hard to prove it with induction.
â Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18
What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20
Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25
A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/â¦
â Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove
$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.
I can see how this would happen:
$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$
$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get
$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$
Which in turn would be $k!$
However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?
derivatives proof-writing induction
So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove
$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.
I can see how this would happen:
$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$
$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get
$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$
Which in turn would be $k!$
However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?
derivatives proof-writing induction
edited 7 hours ago
Robert Howard
1,241620
1,241620
asked Aug 3 at 22:12
user122343
445
445
Its not hard to prove it with induction.
â Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18
What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20
Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25
A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/â¦
â Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25
add a comment |Â
Its not hard to prove it with induction.
â Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18
What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20
Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25
A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/â¦
â Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25
Its not hard to prove it with induction.
â Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18
Its not hard to prove it with induction.
â Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18
What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20
What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20
Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25
Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25
A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/â¦
â Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25
A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/â¦
â Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
$$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign
You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign
answered Aug 3 at 22:25
José Carlos Santos
112k1696172
112k1696172
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
add a comment |Â
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
â Nicolas FRANCOIS
Aug 3 at 22:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
$$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
$$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
$$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)
Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
$$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)
answered Aug 3 at 22:26
Nicolas FRANCOIS
3,1121414
3,1121414
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871543%2finduction-differential-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Its not hard to prove it with induction.
â Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18
What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20
Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25
A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/â¦
â Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25