Induction differential proof

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove



$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.



I can see how this would happen:



$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$



$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get



$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$



Which in turn would be $k!$



However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Its not hard to prove it with induction.
    – Calvin Khor
    Aug 3 at 22:18










  • What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 3 at 22:20










  • Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Aug 3 at 22:25











  • A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 3 at 22:25














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove



$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.



I can see how this would happen:



$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$



$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get



$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$



Which in turn would be $k!$



However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Its not hard to prove it with induction.
    – Calvin Khor
    Aug 3 at 22:18










  • What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 3 at 22:20










  • Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Aug 3 at 22:25











  • A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 3 at 22:25












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove



$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.



I can see how this would happen:



$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$



$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get



$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$



Which in turn would be $k!$



However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?







share|cite|improve this question













So I was doing an induction proof that contained a differential. Now I got through most of it but lastly in order to complete the proof I needed to prove



$$fracd^k dx^kx^k=k!$$
Now I don't need to do this via induction or anything it's just that inside the actual induction proof this statement was there and in order to prove the $(k+1)$-th term I need to show this.



I can see how this would happen:



$fracd dxx^k = k(x^k-1)$



$fracd^2 dx^2x^k = k(k-1)x^k-2$
..
...
..
Until eventually I would get



$kcdot (k-1)cdot (k-2)cdot (k-3)cdot ... cdot x^k-k$



Which in turn would be $k!$



However is there any better way of showing this, like a more formal proof or better strucutred one ?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Robert Howard

1,241620




1,241620









asked Aug 3 at 22:12









user122343

445




445











  • Its not hard to prove it with induction.
    – Calvin Khor
    Aug 3 at 22:18










  • What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 3 at 22:20










  • Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Aug 3 at 22:25











  • A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 3 at 22:25
















  • Its not hard to prove it with induction.
    – Calvin Khor
    Aug 3 at 22:18










  • What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 3 at 22:20










  • Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Aug 3 at 22:25











  • A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 3 at 22:25















Its not hard to prove it with induction.
– Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18




Its not hard to prove it with induction.
– Calvin Khor
Aug 3 at 22:18












What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
– Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20




What you wrote looks good enough if only it was typeset in MathJax.
– Arnaud Mortier
Aug 3 at 22:20












Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
– Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25





Besides proving $fracd^kdx^k(x^k) = k!$ by induction on $k$, you could also formalize your argument directly: prove by induction on $n$ that whenever $1 le n le k$, then $fracd^ndx^n(x^k) = frack!(k-n)! x^k-n$.
– Daniel Schepler
Aug 3 at 22:25













A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25




A tutorial for typing mathematics in MathJax can be found here, by the way: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Robert Howard
Aug 3 at 22:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
    – Nicolas FRANCOIS
    Aug 3 at 22:27

















up vote
6
down vote













Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
$$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871543%2finduction-differential-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
      – Nicolas FRANCOIS
      Aug 3 at 22:27














    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
      – Nicolas FRANCOIS
      Aug 3 at 22:27












    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted






    You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer













    You wrote that you don't need to do this via induction, but it's a good way of doing it. What I mean by this is that you can prove by induction on $k$ that $fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^n=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-k$, where $ngeqslant k$. If $k=1$, this is just the assertion that $fracmathrm dmathrm dxx=1$. Suppose that it is true for some $k$. Thenbeginalignfracmathrm d^k+1mathrm dx^k+1x^n&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(fracmathrm d^kmathrm dx^kx^nright)\&=fracmathrm dmathrm dxleft(n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)x^n-kright)\&=n(n-1)cdots(n-k+1)(n-k)x^n-k-1endalign







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Aug 3 at 22:25









    José Carlos Santos

    112k1696172




    112k1696172











    • You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
      – Nicolas FRANCOIS
      Aug 3 at 22:27
















    • You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
      – Nicolas FRANCOIS
      Aug 3 at 22:27















    You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
    – Nicolas FRANCOIS
    Aug 3 at 22:27




    You go exactly the opposite way with your induction than I do, José :-)
    – Nicolas FRANCOIS
    Aug 3 at 22:27










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
    $$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
    There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
      $$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
      There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
        $$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
        There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Another way : suppose $fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = n!$ for some $ninmathbf N$. Then :
        $$fracd^n+1dx^n+1(x^n+1) = fracd^ndx^nleft(fracddx(x^n+1)right) = fracd^ndx^n((n+1)x^n) = (n+1)fracd^ndx^n(x^n) = (n+1)n! = (n+1)!$$
        There you have to know the first derivative of $x^n$ for any $n$, which can be proved... by induction, knowing the derivative of a product and the derivative of $x$ and $1$ :-)







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Aug 3 at 22:26









        Nicolas FRANCOIS

        3,1121414




        3,1121414






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871543%2finduction-differential-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?