Real projective space and transersality problem

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am presented with the following problem:



Given $pi: S^3 to mathbbRP^3$, the quotient map to the real projective space.



For any $t in [0,1]$, we define $S_3=(x,y,z,t): x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2=1 subset S^3$



And we define $Lambda: (x,0,0,w): x^2+y^2=1subset S^3$.



Prove that for any $t in [0,1]$: $pi(S_t)$ is a dimension $2$ sub-manifold of $mathbbRP^3$, that intersects $pi(Lambda)$ transversally.



Ok.. so, proving that $pi(S_t)$ is a sooth manifold for $t>0$, is pretty trivial, considering that $S_t$ is a smooth manifold, and $S_t$ is homeomorphic to $pi(S_t)$.



And when $t=0$, just pick local charts that sends an small enough open set back to $S_t$, to specified, strategically chosen open sets, then sending them by the charts of $S_t$.



For the ladder part, I thought of this, since $Y:=pi(Lambda)$ has dimension $1$ and $Z:=pi(S_t)$ dimension $2$, you have that given $xin Ycap Z$,



Since $dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ can be at most $1$:



$dimT_xY + dimT_xZ-dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ is either $3$ or $2$. (If it is $3$ I am done)



My idea is to prove that $T_xYcap T_xZ$ cannot have dimension $1$, so if $(T_xYcap T_xZ) subset T_xY$ has dimension $1$, you must have $(T_xYcap T_xZ) = T_xY$, hence $T_xY subset T_xZ$.



Now, all I got to do is find an $v in T_xY$ that it is not in $T_xZ$, but my problem is seeing $T_xY$ and $T_xZ$. I tried proving that $pi$ is differentiable submersion but I am not sure if this is true.



Any help would be appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question













This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bajo Fondo ending ending at 2018-08-12 23:33:55Z">in 6 days.


This question has not received enough attention.















  • Yes, any (smooth) covering map is always a submersion. In fact, it's a local diffeomorphism.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Aug 3 at 22:40














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am presented with the following problem:



Given $pi: S^3 to mathbbRP^3$, the quotient map to the real projective space.



For any $t in [0,1]$, we define $S_3=(x,y,z,t): x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2=1 subset S^3$



And we define $Lambda: (x,0,0,w): x^2+y^2=1subset S^3$.



Prove that for any $t in [0,1]$: $pi(S_t)$ is a dimension $2$ sub-manifold of $mathbbRP^3$, that intersects $pi(Lambda)$ transversally.



Ok.. so, proving that $pi(S_t)$ is a sooth manifold for $t>0$, is pretty trivial, considering that $S_t$ is a smooth manifold, and $S_t$ is homeomorphic to $pi(S_t)$.



And when $t=0$, just pick local charts that sends an small enough open set back to $S_t$, to specified, strategically chosen open sets, then sending them by the charts of $S_t$.



For the ladder part, I thought of this, since $Y:=pi(Lambda)$ has dimension $1$ and $Z:=pi(S_t)$ dimension $2$, you have that given $xin Ycap Z$,



Since $dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ can be at most $1$:



$dimT_xY + dimT_xZ-dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ is either $3$ or $2$. (If it is $3$ I am done)



My idea is to prove that $T_xYcap T_xZ$ cannot have dimension $1$, so if $(T_xYcap T_xZ) subset T_xY$ has dimension $1$, you must have $(T_xYcap T_xZ) = T_xY$, hence $T_xY subset T_xZ$.



Now, all I got to do is find an $v in T_xY$ that it is not in $T_xZ$, but my problem is seeing $T_xY$ and $T_xZ$. I tried proving that $pi$ is differentiable submersion but I am not sure if this is true.



Any help would be appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question













This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bajo Fondo ending ending at 2018-08-12 23:33:55Z">in 6 days.


This question has not received enough attention.















  • Yes, any (smooth) covering map is always a submersion. In fact, it's a local diffeomorphism.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Aug 3 at 22:40












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I am presented with the following problem:



Given $pi: S^3 to mathbbRP^3$, the quotient map to the real projective space.



For any $t in [0,1]$, we define $S_3=(x,y,z,t): x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2=1 subset S^3$



And we define $Lambda: (x,0,0,w): x^2+y^2=1subset S^3$.



Prove that for any $t in [0,1]$: $pi(S_t)$ is a dimension $2$ sub-manifold of $mathbbRP^3$, that intersects $pi(Lambda)$ transversally.



Ok.. so, proving that $pi(S_t)$ is a sooth manifold for $t>0$, is pretty trivial, considering that $S_t$ is a smooth manifold, and $S_t$ is homeomorphic to $pi(S_t)$.



And when $t=0$, just pick local charts that sends an small enough open set back to $S_t$, to specified, strategically chosen open sets, then sending them by the charts of $S_t$.



For the ladder part, I thought of this, since $Y:=pi(Lambda)$ has dimension $1$ and $Z:=pi(S_t)$ dimension $2$, you have that given $xin Ycap Z$,



Since $dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ can be at most $1$:



$dimT_xY + dimT_xZ-dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ is either $3$ or $2$. (If it is $3$ I am done)



My idea is to prove that $T_xYcap T_xZ$ cannot have dimension $1$, so if $(T_xYcap T_xZ) subset T_xY$ has dimension $1$, you must have $(T_xYcap T_xZ) = T_xY$, hence $T_xY subset T_xZ$.



Now, all I got to do is find an $v in T_xY$ that it is not in $T_xZ$, but my problem is seeing $T_xY$ and $T_xZ$. I tried proving that $pi$ is differentiable submersion but I am not sure if this is true.



Any help would be appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question











I am presented with the following problem:



Given $pi: S^3 to mathbbRP^3$, the quotient map to the real projective space.



For any $t in [0,1]$, we define $S_3=(x,y,z,t): x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2=1 subset S^3$



And we define $Lambda: (x,0,0,w): x^2+y^2=1subset S^3$.



Prove that for any $t in [0,1]$: $pi(S_t)$ is a dimension $2$ sub-manifold of $mathbbRP^3$, that intersects $pi(Lambda)$ transversally.



Ok.. so, proving that $pi(S_t)$ is a sooth manifold for $t>0$, is pretty trivial, considering that $S_t$ is a smooth manifold, and $S_t$ is homeomorphic to $pi(S_t)$.



And when $t=0$, just pick local charts that sends an small enough open set back to $S_t$, to specified, strategically chosen open sets, then sending them by the charts of $S_t$.



For the ladder part, I thought of this, since $Y:=pi(Lambda)$ has dimension $1$ and $Z:=pi(S_t)$ dimension $2$, you have that given $xin Ycap Z$,



Since $dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ can be at most $1$:



$dimT_xY + dimT_xZ-dim(T_xYcap T_xZ)$ is either $3$ or $2$. (If it is $3$ I am done)



My idea is to prove that $T_xYcap T_xZ$ cannot have dimension $1$, so if $(T_xYcap T_xZ) subset T_xY$ has dimension $1$, you must have $(T_xYcap T_xZ) = T_xY$, hence $T_xY subset T_xZ$.



Now, all I got to do is find an $v in T_xY$ that it is not in $T_xZ$, but my problem is seeing $T_xY$ and $T_xZ$. I tried proving that $pi$ is differentiable submersion but I am not sure if this is true.



Any help would be appreciated.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Aug 3 at 21:38









Bajo Fondo

376213




376213






This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bajo Fondo ending ending at 2018-08-12 23:33:55Z">in 6 days.


This question has not received enough attention.








This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bajo Fondo ending ending at 2018-08-12 23:33:55Z">in 6 days.


This question has not received enough attention.













  • Yes, any (smooth) covering map is always a submersion. In fact, it's a local diffeomorphism.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Aug 3 at 22:40
















  • Yes, any (smooth) covering map is always a submersion. In fact, it's a local diffeomorphism.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Aug 3 at 22:40















Yes, any (smooth) covering map is always a submersion. In fact, it's a local diffeomorphism.
– Ted Shifrin
Aug 3 at 22:40




Yes, any (smooth) covering map is always a submersion. In fact, it's a local diffeomorphism.
– Ted Shifrin
Aug 3 at 22:40















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871520%2freal-projective-space-and-transersality-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871520%2freal-projective-space-and-transersality-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?