Is $D(f)$ the smallest open set of $operatornameSpecB$ such that $D_+(f)subset D(f)$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $B$ be a graded ring and $rho:operatornameProjBto operatornameSpecB$ the canonical injection, that is, $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$. For any non-nilpotent homogeneous $fin B_+$, is $D(f)$ the smallest open set of $operatornameSpecB$ such that $D_+(f)subset D(f)$?
algebraic-geometry affine-schemes projective-schemes
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $B$ be a graded ring and $rho:operatornameProjBto operatornameSpecB$ the canonical injection, that is, $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$. For any non-nilpotent homogeneous $fin B_+$, is $D(f)$ the smallest open set of $operatornameSpecB$ such that $D_+(f)subset D(f)$?
algebraic-geometry affine-schemes projective-schemes
1
I don't understand what you mean by the canonical injection $mathrmProj Bto mathrmSpec B$; for example, if $B=k[x_0,...,x_n]$ this is saying that $mathbb P^n$ embeds in $mathrm A^n$, which is not true.
â Devlin Mallory
2 days ago
$rho$ is not a morphism of schemes. $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$.
â Born to be proud
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $B$ be a graded ring and $rho:operatornameProjBto operatornameSpecB$ the canonical injection, that is, $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$. For any non-nilpotent homogeneous $fin B_+$, is $D(f)$ the smallest open set of $operatornameSpecB$ such that $D_+(f)subset D(f)$?
algebraic-geometry affine-schemes projective-schemes
Let $B$ be a graded ring and $rho:operatornameProjBto operatornameSpecB$ the canonical injection, that is, $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$. For any non-nilpotent homogeneous $fin B_+$, is $D(f)$ the smallest open set of $operatornameSpecB$ such that $D_+(f)subset D(f)$?
algebraic-geometry affine-schemes projective-schemes
edited 2 days ago
asked 2 days ago
Born to be proud
41229
41229
1
I don't understand what you mean by the canonical injection $mathrmProj Bto mathrmSpec B$; for example, if $B=k[x_0,...,x_n]$ this is saying that $mathbb P^n$ embeds in $mathrm A^n$, which is not true.
â Devlin Mallory
2 days ago
$rho$ is not a morphism of schemes. $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$.
â Born to be proud
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
1
I don't understand what you mean by the canonical injection $mathrmProj Bto mathrmSpec B$; for example, if $B=k[x_0,...,x_n]$ this is saying that $mathbb P^n$ embeds in $mathrm A^n$, which is not true.
â Devlin Mallory
2 days ago
$rho$ is not a morphism of schemes. $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$.
â Born to be proud
2 days ago
1
1
I don't understand what you mean by the canonical injection $mathrmProj Bto mathrmSpec B$; for example, if $B=k[x_0,...,x_n]$ this is saying that $mathbb P^n$ embeds in $mathrm A^n$, which is not true.
â Devlin Mallory
2 days ago
I don't understand what you mean by the canonical injection $mathrmProj Bto mathrmSpec B$; for example, if $B=k[x_0,...,x_n]$ this is saying that $mathbb P^n$ embeds in $mathrm A^n$, which is not true.
â Devlin Mallory
2 days ago
$rho$ is not a morphism of schemes. $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$.
â Born to be proud
2 days ago
$rho$ is not a morphism of schemes. $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$.
â Born to be proud
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Let $B_0=B$, then $B_+=0$, so $operatornameProjB=varnothing$.
However, it doesn't make any sense.
Can anybody give a counterexample such that $D_+(f)neq varnothing$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Let $B_0=B$, then $B_+=0$, so $operatornameProjB=varnothing$.
However, it doesn't make any sense.
Can anybody give a counterexample such that $D_+(f)neq varnothing$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Let $B_0=B$, then $B_+=0$, so $operatornameProjB=varnothing$.
However, it doesn't make any sense.
Can anybody give a counterexample such that $D_+(f)neq varnothing$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Let $B_0=B$, then $B_+=0$, so $operatornameProjB=varnothing$.
However, it doesn't make any sense.
Can anybody give a counterexample such that $D_+(f)neq varnothing$
Let $B_0=B$, then $B_+=0$, so $operatornameProjB=varnothing$.
However, it doesn't make any sense.
Can anybody give a counterexample such that $D_+(f)neq varnothing$
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Born to be proud
41229
41229
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871697%2fis-df-the-smallest-open-set-of-operatornamespecb-such-that-d-f-subs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I don't understand what you mean by the canonical injection $mathrmProj Bto mathrmSpec B$; for example, if $B=k[x_0,...,x_n]$ this is saying that $mathbb P^n$ embeds in $mathrm A^n$, which is not true.
â Devlin Mallory
2 days ago
$rho$ is not a morphism of schemes. $forall mathfrak pin operatornameProjB$, $rho(mathfrak p)=mathfrak p$.
â Born to be proud
2 days ago