Generic hyperplane and transversal intersection
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to solve an exercise I.7.7 in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry:
7.7. Let $Y$ be a variety of dimension $r$ and degree $d>1$ in $mathbbP^n$. Let $P in Y$ be a nonsingular point. Define $X$ to be
the closure of the union of all lines $overlinePQ$, where $Q in Y,
> Qneq P$.
(a) Show that $X$ is a variety of dimension $r+1$.
(b) Show that $deg X < d$.
I've proved (a); it follows from the fact that there is a dominant rational map from the projective cone over $Y$ to $X$.
However, to prove (b), I'm stuck.
I found that it suffices to prove the following:
Let us consider the set $(mathbbP^n)^*$ of all hyperplanes in
$mathbbP^n$ as the projective $n$-space $mathbbP^n$ with its
Zariski topology.
Let $W$ be the set of all hyperplanes containing $P$. Then W is a
hyperplane in $(mathbbP^n)^*$.
Then, for any (closed) variety $Y subset mathbbP^n$ which contains
$P$ and is nonsingular at $P$, the set
$$ Hin W: mboxFor every irreducible component $Z$ of Ycap H, i(Y,H;Z) = 1. $$
contains a nonempty open subset of $W$.
Now $i(Y,H;Z)$ is the intersection multiplicity of $Y$ and $H$ along $Z$, i.e., the length of the $mathcalO_Z$-module $mathcalO_Z / (I(Y)+I(H))mathcalO_Z$, where $mathcalO_Z$ is the local ring of $mathbbP^n$ at $Z$.
How can I prove this? Thanks.
Edited: I found that if the ideal $I(Y)+I(H)$ is a radical ideal, then $i(Y,H;Z) = 1$ for all $Z$.
algebraic-geometry intersection-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to solve an exercise I.7.7 in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry:
7.7. Let $Y$ be a variety of dimension $r$ and degree $d>1$ in $mathbbP^n$. Let $P in Y$ be a nonsingular point. Define $X$ to be
the closure of the union of all lines $overlinePQ$, where $Q in Y,
> Qneq P$.
(a) Show that $X$ is a variety of dimension $r+1$.
(b) Show that $deg X < d$.
I've proved (a); it follows from the fact that there is a dominant rational map from the projective cone over $Y$ to $X$.
However, to prove (b), I'm stuck.
I found that it suffices to prove the following:
Let us consider the set $(mathbbP^n)^*$ of all hyperplanes in
$mathbbP^n$ as the projective $n$-space $mathbbP^n$ with its
Zariski topology.
Let $W$ be the set of all hyperplanes containing $P$. Then W is a
hyperplane in $(mathbbP^n)^*$.
Then, for any (closed) variety $Y subset mathbbP^n$ which contains
$P$ and is nonsingular at $P$, the set
$$ Hin W: mboxFor every irreducible component $Z$ of Ycap H, i(Y,H;Z) = 1. $$
contains a nonempty open subset of $W$.
Now $i(Y,H;Z)$ is the intersection multiplicity of $Y$ and $H$ along $Z$, i.e., the length of the $mathcalO_Z$-module $mathcalO_Z / (I(Y)+I(H))mathcalO_Z$, where $mathcalO_Z$ is the local ring of $mathbbP^n$ at $Z$.
How can I prove this? Thanks.
Edited: I found that if the ideal $I(Y)+I(H)$ is a radical ideal, then $i(Y,H;Z) = 1$ for all $Z$.
algebraic-geometry intersection-theory
do you know that the degree of a variety can be expressed as the generic number of intersection points that it has with a linear subspace if complementary dimension?
â Jesko Hüttenhain
yesterday
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to solve an exercise I.7.7 in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry:
7.7. Let $Y$ be a variety of dimension $r$ and degree $d>1$ in $mathbbP^n$. Let $P in Y$ be a nonsingular point. Define $X$ to be
the closure of the union of all lines $overlinePQ$, where $Q in Y,
> Qneq P$.
(a) Show that $X$ is a variety of dimension $r+1$.
(b) Show that $deg X < d$.
I've proved (a); it follows from the fact that there is a dominant rational map from the projective cone over $Y$ to $X$.
However, to prove (b), I'm stuck.
I found that it suffices to prove the following:
Let us consider the set $(mathbbP^n)^*$ of all hyperplanes in
$mathbbP^n$ as the projective $n$-space $mathbbP^n$ with its
Zariski topology.
Let $W$ be the set of all hyperplanes containing $P$. Then W is a
hyperplane in $(mathbbP^n)^*$.
Then, for any (closed) variety $Y subset mathbbP^n$ which contains
$P$ and is nonsingular at $P$, the set
$$ Hin W: mboxFor every irreducible component $Z$ of Ycap H, i(Y,H;Z) = 1. $$
contains a nonempty open subset of $W$.
Now $i(Y,H;Z)$ is the intersection multiplicity of $Y$ and $H$ along $Z$, i.e., the length of the $mathcalO_Z$-module $mathcalO_Z / (I(Y)+I(H))mathcalO_Z$, where $mathcalO_Z$ is the local ring of $mathbbP^n$ at $Z$.
How can I prove this? Thanks.
Edited: I found that if the ideal $I(Y)+I(H)$ is a radical ideal, then $i(Y,H;Z) = 1$ for all $Z$.
algebraic-geometry intersection-theory
I'm trying to solve an exercise I.7.7 in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry:
7.7. Let $Y$ be a variety of dimension $r$ and degree $d>1$ in $mathbbP^n$. Let $P in Y$ be a nonsingular point. Define $X$ to be
the closure of the union of all lines $overlinePQ$, where $Q in Y,
> Qneq P$.
(a) Show that $X$ is a variety of dimension $r+1$.
(b) Show that $deg X < d$.
I've proved (a); it follows from the fact that there is a dominant rational map from the projective cone over $Y$ to $X$.
However, to prove (b), I'm stuck.
I found that it suffices to prove the following:
Let us consider the set $(mathbbP^n)^*$ of all hyperplanes in
$mathbbP^n$ as the projective $n$-space $mathbbP^n$ with its
Zariski topology.
Let $W$ be the set of all hyperplanes containing $P$. Then W is a
hyperplane in $(mathbbP^n)^*$.
Then, for any (closed) variety $Y subset mathbbP^n$ which contains
$P$ and is nonsingular at $P$, the set
$$ Hin W: mboxFor every irreducible component $Z$ of Ycap H, i(Y,H;Z) = 1. $$
contains a nonempty open subset of $W$.
Now $i(Y,H;Z)$ is the intersection multiplicity of $Y$ and $H$ along $Z$, i.e., the length of the $mathcalO_Z$-module $mathcalO_Z / (I(Y)+I(H))mathcalO_Z$, where $mathcalO_Z$ is the local ring of $mathbbP^n$ at $Z$.
How can I prove this? Thanks.
Edited: I found that if the ideal $I(Y)+I(H)$ is a radical ideal, then $i(Y,H;Z) = 1$ for all $Z$.
algebraic-geometry intersection-theory
edited 2 days ago
asked 2 days ago
Hiro Wat
887
887
do you know that the degree of a variety can be expressed as the generic number of intersection points that it has with a linear subspace if complementary dimension?
â Jesko Hüttenhain
yesterday
add a comment |Â
do you know that the degree of a variety can be expressed as the generic number of intersection points that it has with a linear subspace if complementary dimension?
â Jesko Hüttenhain
yesterday
do you know that the degree of a variety can be expressed as the generic number of intersection points that it has with a linear subspace if complementary dimension?
â Jesko Hüttenhain
yesterday
do you know that the degree of a variety can be expressed as the generic number of intersection points that it has with a linear subspace if complementary dimension?
â Jesko Hüttenhain
yesterday
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871773%2fgeneric-hyperplane-and-transversal-intersection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
do you know that the degree of a variety can be expressed as the generic number of intersection points that it has with a linear subspace if complementary dimension?
â Jesko Hüttenhain
yesterday