Necessary/sufficient conditions for certain line arrangement in hexagon
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?
geometry
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?
geometry
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?
geometry
Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?
geometry
edited 2 days ago
M. Winter
17.5k62664
17.5k62664
asked 2 days ago
dasari naga vijay krishna
894
894
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.
- Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.
If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.
The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.
- Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.
Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.
Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
$$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.
So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.
- Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.
If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.
The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.
- Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.
Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.
Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
$$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.
So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.
- Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.
If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.
The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.
- Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.
Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.
Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
$$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.
So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.
- Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.
If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.
The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.
- Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.
Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.
Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
$$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.
So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.
Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.
- Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.
If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.
The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.
- Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.
Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.
Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
$$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.
So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
timon92
3,6591724
3,6591724
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
â Blue
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
Pls can u give proof of this statement,
â dasari naga vijay krishna
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
@dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
â timon92
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871747%2fnecessary-sufficient-conditions-for-certain-line-arrangement-in-hexagon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password