Necessary/sufficient conditions for certain line arrangement in hexagon

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?







      share|cite|improve this question













      Are there any necessary or sufficient condition for when in a general convex hexagon, the lines formed by joining the midpoints of opposite sides are concurrent (intersect in a common point)?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      M. Winter

      17.5k62664




      17.5k62664









      asked 2 days ago









      dasari naga vijay krishna

      894




      894




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.




          1. Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.



          If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.




          The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.




          1. Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.



          Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.



          Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
          $$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
          Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.




          So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
            – Blue
            2 days ago











          • Pls can u give proof of this statement,
            – dasari naga vijay krishna
            2 days ago











          • @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
            – timon92
            2 days ago










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871747%2fnecessary-sufficient-conditions-for-certain-line-arrangement-in-hexagon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.




          1. Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.



          If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.




          The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.




          1. Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.



          Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.



          Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
          $$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
          Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.




          So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
            – Blue
            2 days ago











          • Pls can u give proof of this statement,
            – dasari naga vijay krishna
            2 days ago











          • @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
            – timon92
            2 days ago














          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.




          1. Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.



          If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.




          The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.




          1. Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.



          Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.



          Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
          $$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
          Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.




          So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
            – Blue
            2 days ago











          • Pls can u give proof of this statement,
            – dasari naga vijay krishna
            2 days ago











          • @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
            – timon92
            2 days ago












          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.




          1. Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.



          If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.




          The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.




          1. Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.



          Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.



          Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
          $$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
          Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.




          So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.






          share|cite|improve this answer















          Please take a look at problem 21 in this pdf.




          1. Let $ABCDEF$ be a convex hexagon. If the area of $ACE$ is equal to the area of $BDF$ then the lines joining the midpoints of opposite sides concur.



          If I recall correctly, the equality of these areas is also a necessary condition.




          The proof uses problem 10 from the same pdf.




          1. Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Let $AC$ intersect $BD$ at $E$. Let $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ such that the area of $BCP$ is equal to the area of $DAP$. Prove that the midpoints of $AB$, $CD$ and $EP$ are collinear.



          Now, let me sketch a proof of 21.



          Let $K,L,M,N,O,P$ be the midpoints of $AB, BC, CD ,DE, EF, FA$, respectively. Let $KN$ intersect $LO$ at $Q$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of $EB$. We use notation $[mathcal F]$ to denote the area of $mathcal F$. Then
          $$[KLS] = frac 14 [ACE] = frac 14 [BDF] = [SNO].$$
          Using 10. we get that the midpoints of $QS, KO, LN$ are collinear. Denote this points by $X,Y,Z$, respectively. Note that $PKSO$ and $MLSN$ are parallelograms, so $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of $SP$ and $SM$, respectively. The homothety centered at $S$ and ratio $2$ maps $X,Y,Z$ to $Q,P,M$. It follows that $PM$ passes through $Q$ and we are done.




          So, everything boils down to prove the thesis of problem 10. To prove it, you can adapt an argument from this post.







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago


























          answered 2 days ago









          timon92

          3,6591724




          3,6591724











          • Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
            – Blue
            2 days ago











          • Pls can u give proof of this statement,
            – dasari naga vijay krishna
            2 days ago











          • @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
            – timon92
            2 days ago
















          • Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
            – Blue
            2 days ago











          • Pls can u give proof of this statement,
            – dasari naga vijay krishna
            2 days ago











          • @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
            – timon92
            2 days ago















          Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
          – Blue
          2 days ago





          Interesting. I was just going to comment a conjecture that the answer was that "the alternating sum of the areas of triangles formed by pairs of adjacent edges vanishes". This turns out to be an embarrassingly-inelegant way of getting at the same idea as your solution.
          – Blue
          2 days ago













          Pls can u give proof of this statement,
          – dasari naga vijay krishna
          2 days ago





          Pls can u give proof of this statement,
          – dasari naga vijay krishna
          2 days ago













          @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
          – timon92
          2 days ago




          @dasarinagavijaykrishna I have edited my post.
          – timon92
          2 days ago












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871747%2fnecessary-sufficient-conditions-for-certain-line-arrangement-in-hexagon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?