An interesting property of the roots [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.
How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?
P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
roots roots-of-unity
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.
How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?
P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
roots roots-of-unity
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,†I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39
1
What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39
@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41
1
@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43
1
Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.
How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?
P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
roots roots-of-unity
Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.
How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?
P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
roots roots-of-unity
edited Jul 14 at 14:46
asked Jul 14 at 14:37
user571036
27818
27818
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,†I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39
1
What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39
@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41
1
@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43
1
Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50
 |Â
show 1 more comment
As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,†I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39
1
What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39
@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41
1
@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43
1
Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50
As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,†I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39
As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,†I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39
1
1
What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39
What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39
@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41
@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41
1
1
@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43
@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43
1
1
Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50
Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50
 |Â
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$
That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$
Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$
Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$
You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
There are a few ways. Notice that
$, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
$, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
$, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$
That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$
Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$
Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$
You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$
That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$
Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$
Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$
You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$
That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$
Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$
Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$
You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$
Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$
That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$
Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$
Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$
You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$
answered Jul 14 at 15:02


Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
27.7k41852
27.7k41852
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
add a comment |Â
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
Great answer. Thanks.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 15:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
There are a few ways. Notice that
$, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
$, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
$, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
There are a few ways. Notice that
$, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
$, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
$, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
There are a few ways. Notice that
$, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
$, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
$, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$
There are a few ways. Notice that
$, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
$, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
$, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$
edited Jul 14 at 21:26
answered Jul 14 at 15:03


Somos
11.7k11033
11.7k11033
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,†I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39
1
What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39
@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41
1
@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43
1
Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50