An interesting property of the roots [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.



How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?



P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,” I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
    – Bob Krueger
    Jul 14 at 14:39






  • 1




    What did you try?
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:39










  • @tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 14:41






  • 1




    @user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:43






  • 1




    Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
    – achille hui
    Jul 14 at 14:50














up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.



How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?



P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,” I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
    – Bob Krueger
    Jul 14 at 14:39






  • 1




    What did you try?
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:39










  • @tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 14:41






  • 1




    @user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:43






  • 1




    Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
    – achille hui
    Jul 14 at 14:50












up vote
-2
down vote

favorite









up vote
-2
down vote

favorite











Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.



How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?



P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.







share|cite|improve this question













Let $x^2+x+1=0$ be a quadratic equation having two roots $x_1$ and $x_2$.



How would you prove that $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$?



P.S. I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 14 at 14:46
























asked Jul 14 at 14:37









user571036

27818




27818




closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, abiessu, user223391, amWhy, Leucippus Jul 15 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Alex Francisco, abiessu, Community, amWhy, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,” I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
    – Bob Krueger
    Jul 14 at 14:39






  • 1




    What did you try?
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:39










  • @tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 14:41






  • 1




    @user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:43






  • 1




    Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
    – achille hui
    Jul 14 at 14:50
















  • As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,” I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
    – Bob Krueger
    Jul 14 at 14:39






  • 1




    What did you try?
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:39










  • @tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 14:41






  • 1




    @user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
    – tien lee
    Jul 14 at 14:43






  • 1




    Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
    – achille hui
    Jul 14 at 14:50















As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,” I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39




As you tagged this “roots-of-unity,” I’m sure this would be an easy exercise if you knew complex numbers.
– Bob Krueger
Jul 14 at 14:39




1




1




What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39




What did you try?
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:39












@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41




@tienlee I could show $(x_1)^2=x_2$ and $(x_2)^2=x_1$ by finding the roots explicitly then squaring and comparing. But that's not a proper approach.
– user571036
Jul 14 at 14:41




1




1




@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43




@user571036 But at least show your work and someone could probably help you with that approach.
– tien lee
Jul 14 at 14:43




1




1




Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50




Vieta's formula tell us $x_1 + x_2 = -1$, so $x_1^2 = -1 - x_1 = x_2$ ...
– achille hui
Jul 14 at 14:50










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$



That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$



Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$



Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$



You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great answer. Thanks.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 15:32

















up vote
1
down vote













There are a few ways. Notice that
$, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
$, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
$, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$






share|cite|improve this answer






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$



    That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$



    Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$



    Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$



    You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Great answer. Thanks.
      – user571036
      Jul 14 at 15:32














    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$



    That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$



    Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$



    Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$



    You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Great answer. Thanks.
      – user571036
      Jul 14 at 15:32












    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$



    That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$



    Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$



    Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$



    You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$






    share|cite|improve this answer













    Note that we have $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1 $$



    That is $$ (x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2 +1) =0$$



    Since $$x_1 ne x_2$$ we get $$x_1+x_2 +1=0$$



    Compare with $$x_1^2+x_1+1=x_2^2+x_2+1=0 $$



    You get $$x_1=x_2^2$$ and $$x_2 = x_1 ^2 $$







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Jul 14 at 15:02









    Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

    27.7k41852




    27.7k41852











    • Great answer. Thanks.
      – user571036
      Jul 14 at 15:32
















    • Great answer. Thanks.
      – user571036
      Jul 14 at 15:32















    Great answer. Thanks.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 15:32




    Great answer. Thanks.
    – user571036
    Jul 14 at 15:32










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    There are a few ways. Notice that
    $, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
    $, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
    $, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
    Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      There are a few ways. Notice that
      $, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
      $, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
      $, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
      Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        There are a few ways. Notice that
        $, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
        $, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
        $, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
        Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$






        share|cite|improve this answer















        There are a few ways. Notice that
        $, x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1). ,$ If $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation
        $, E_1!:, x^2 + x + 1 = 0,$ then this implies $, x_1^3 = 1 ,$ and $,x_1,$ is a root of the equation $, E_2!:, x^3 -1 = 0.,$ Define
        $, x_2 := x_1^2. ,$ Now $, x_2^3 = (x_1^2)^3 = (x_1^3)^2 = 1^2 =1 ,$ which implies that $, x_2 ,$ is also a root of equation $, E_2, ,$
        Since $,x_1 ne 1, ,$ $, x_2 ne 1 ,$ and $, x_1 ne x_2, ,$ then $,x_2,$ is the other root of the equation $, E_1.,$







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 14 at 21:26


























        answered Jul 14 at 15:03









        Somos

        11.7k11033




        11.7k11033












            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?