are there any relations between these subspaces
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have a pair of square matrices $(E,A)$ of the same dimension say $n$, consider the following subspaces
First:
$V_0=mathbbR^n, V_i+1=A^-1(EV_i), W_0=0, W_i+1=E^-1(AW_i)$
A matrix $Q$ is called projector onto a subspace $S$ iff $text Im Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$, It is called a projector along a subspace $S$ iff $ker Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$.
Second:
we define a matrix chain by setting
$E_0=E$
$ A_0=A,$
$ E_i+1=E_i-A_iQ_i, $
$A_i+1=A_iP_i$
$Q_i$ are are projectors onto $ker E_i, P_i=I-Q_i$
my question or intention is to ask here or maybe someone helps me to convince or point out whether there is or there is no relation between first and second subspaces/ matrices or there is any way to relate them mathematically geometrically slightly changing somewhere in the first or second theme.
In a first way: $V_i$ are decreasing nested chain of subspaces and due to finite dimension, it will be stationary, similar for $W_i$ but they are increasing in nature.
Also, I have proved myself if $det (A-lambda E)ne 0$ then there is some $k$ such that $V_koplus W_k=mathbbR^n, V_kcap W_k=0$.
I have no idea how geometrically looks like the subspaces/matrices in the second case.
if there is some geometric insight hidden there, please help me to understand, so that I myself can relate two, if possible.
Thank you.
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces linear-transformations
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have a pair of square matrices $(E,A)$ of the same dimension say $n$, consider the following subspaces
First:
$V_0=mathbbR^n, V_i+1=A^-1(EV_i), W_0=0, W_i+1=E^-1(AW_i)$
A matrix $Q$ is called projector onto a subspace $S$ iff $text Im Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$, It is called a projector along a subspace $S$ iff $ker Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$.
Second:
we define a matrix chain by setting
$E_0=E$
$ A_0=A,$
$ E_i+1=E_i-A_iQ_i, $
$A_i+1=A_iP_i$
$Q_i$ are are projectors onto $ker E_i, P_i=I-Q_i$
my question or intention is to ask here or maybe someone helps me to convince or point out whether there is or there is no relation between first and second subspaces/ matrices or there is any way to relate them mathematically geometrically slightly changing somewhere in the first or second theme.
In a first way: $V_i$ are decreasing nested chain of subspaces and due to finite dimension, it will be stationary, similar for $W_i$ but they are increasing in nature.
Also, I have proved myself if $det (A-lambda E)ne 0$ then there is some $k$ such that $V_koplus W_k=mathbbR^n, V_kcap W_k=0$.
I have no idea how geometrically looks like the subspaces/matrices in the second case.
if there is some geometric insight hidden there, please help me to understand, so that I myself can relate two, if possible.
Thank you.
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces linear-transformations
I think you need to learn english
– miosaki
Jul 23 at 12:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have a pair of square matrices $(E,A)$ of the same dimension say $n$, consider the following subspaces
First:
$V_0=mathbbR^n, V_i+1=A^-1(EV_i), W_0=0, W_i+1=E^-1(AW_i)$
A matrix $Q$ is called projector onto a subspace $S$ iff $text Im Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$, It is called a projector along a subspace $S$ iff $ker Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$.
Second:
we define a matrix chain by setting
$E_0=E$
$ A_0=A,$
$ E_i+1=E_i-A_iQ_i, $
$A_i+1=A_iP_i$
$Q_i$ are are projectors onto $ker E_i, P_i=I-Q_i$
my question or intention is to ask here or maybe someone helps me to convince or point out whether there is or there is no relation between first and second subspaces/ matrices or there is any way to relate them mathematically geometrically slightly changing somewhere in the first or second theme.
In a first way: $V_i$ are decreasing nested chain of subspaces and due to finite dimension, it will be stationary, similar for $W_i$ but they are increasing in nature.
Also, I have proved myself if $det (A-lambda E)ne 0$ then there is some $k$ such that $V_koplus W_k=mathbbR^n, V_kcap W_k=0$.
I have no idea how geometrically looks like the subspaces/matrices in the second case.
if there is some geometric insight hidden there, please help me to understand, so that I myself can relate two, if possible.
Thank you.
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces linear-transformations
I have a pair of square matrices $(E,A)$ of the same dimension say $n$, consider the following subspaces
First:
$V_0=mathbbR^n, V_i+1=A^-1(EV_i), W_0=0, W_i+1=E^-1(AW_i)$
A matrix $Q$ is called projector onto a subspace $S$ iff $text Im Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$, It is called a projector along a subspace $S$ iff $ker Q=S$ and $Q^2=Q$.
Second:
we define a matrix chain by setting
$E_0=E$
$ A_0=A,$
$ E_i+1=E_i-A_iQ_i, $
$A_i+1=A_iP_i$
$Q_i$ are are projectors onto $ker E_i, P_i=I-Q_i$
my question or intention is to ask here or maybe someone helps me to convince or point out whether there is or there is no relation between first and second subspaces/ matrices or there is any way to relate them mathematically geometrically slightly changing somewhere in the first or second theme.
In a first way: $V_i$ are decreasing nested chain of subspaces and due to finite dimension, it will be stationary, similar for $W_i$ but they are increasing in nature.
Also, I have proved myself if $det (A-lambda E)ne 0$ then there is some $k$ such that $V_koplus W_k=mathbbR^n, V_kcap W_k=0$.
I have no idea how geometrically looks like the subspaces/matrices in the second case.
if there is some geometric insight hidden there, please help me to understand, so that I myself can relate two, if possible.
Thank you.
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces linear-transformations
edited Jul 23 at 10:33
asked Jul 22 at 10:57
miosaki
2,37511431
2,37511431
I think you need to learn english
– miosaki
Jul 23 at 12:46
add a comment |Â
I think you need to learn english
– miosaki
Jul 23 at 12:46
I think you need to learn english
– miosaki
Jul 23 at 12:46
I think you need to learn english
– miosaki
Jul 23 at 12:46
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859286%2fare-there-any-relations-between-these-subspaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I think you need to learn english
– miosaki
Jul 23 at 12:46