The Hahn-Hellinger Theorem

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












People can tell the question is not up to the mark, but I felt without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras for myself. So can any body help me out clearing the concept of Hahn-Hellinger Theorem, what is the game playing inside the theorem, I tried many books and I am not able to get with clarity. More specifically how cyclic vectors are connected with multiplicity of self-adjoint operator, this theorem say any self-adjoint operator in $mathcalH$ is equivalent to a multiplication operator $M_z$ on $oplus L^2(X,mu_i)$, how it looks the case at least for finite dimensional case, how direct sum take cares multiplicity of the eigenvalue that I did not get, Also it is not clear all the measure joined to single measure. Further why cyclic decomposition remembers the spectral multiplicity. Please help. Thanks in advance







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    "without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras": a dubious claim, at best. Arguably, it is much easier to approach the spectral theorem via von Neumann algebras, not vice versa. A normal operator N on a Hilbert space H generates a commutative von Neumann algebra A, whose Gelfand spectrum S is a measurable space. Furthermore, H is an A-module, and the category of A-modules is equivalent to the category of Hilbert bundles over S, yielding a Hilbert bundle B over S. The dimensions of fibers of B are precisely spectral multiplicities.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 16:19










  • @Dmitri Pavlov can you please ellaborate how you connecting modules and hilbert bundles. dimension of fibers to spectral theorem, I will be helpful if you give the litle more clarification
    – mathlover
    Jul 21 at 18:38










  • A few more details can be found in my notes dmitripavlov.org/notes/2018s-6325.pdf, see, in particular, 9.11, 9.14, 9.20. Many things in the text are hyperlinked and will lead you to the relevant definitions.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 22:50











  • Thanks for the link.
    – mathlover
    Jul 22 at 4:15














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












People can tell the question is not up to the mark, but I felt without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras for myself. So can any body help me out clearing the concept of Hahn-Hellinger Theorem, what is the game playing inside the theorem, I tried many books and I am not able to get with clarity. More specifically how cyclic vectors are connected with multiplicity of self-adjoint operator, this theorem say any self-adjoint operator in $mathcalH$ is equivalent to a multiplication operator $M_z$ on $oplus L^2(X,mu_i)$, how it looks the case at least for finite dimensional case, how direct sum take cares multiplicity of the eigenvalue that I did not get, Also it is not clear all the measure joined to single measure. Further why cyclic decomposition remembers the spectral multiplicity. Please help. Thanks in advance







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    "without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras": a dubious claim, at best. Arguably, it is much easier to approach the spectral theorem via von Neumann algebras, not vice versa. A normal operator N on a Hilbert space H generates a commutative von Neumann algebra A, whose Gelfand spectrum S is a measurable space. Furthermore, H is an A-module, and the category of A-modules is equivalent to the category of Hilbert bundles over S, yielding a Hilbert bundle B over S. The dimensions of fibers of B are precisely spectral multiplicities.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 16:19










  • @Dmitri Pavlov can you please ellaborate how you connecting modules and hilbert bundles. dimension of fibers to spectral theorem, I will be helpful if you give the litle more clarification
    – mathlover
    Jul 21 at 18:38










  • A few more details can be found in my notes dmitripavlov.org/notes/2018s-6325.pdf, see, in particular, 9.11, 9.14, 9.20. Many things in the text are hyperlinked and will lead you to the relevant definitions.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 22:50











  • Thanks for the link.
    – mathlover
    Jul 22 at 4:15












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











People can tell the question is not up to the mark, but I felt without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras for myself. So can any body help me out clearing the concept of Hahn-Hellinger Theorem, what is the game playing inside the theorem, I tried many books and I am not able to get with clarity. More specifically how cyclic vectors are connected with multiplicity of self-adjoint operator, this theorem say any self-adjoint operator in $mathcalH$ is equivalent to a multiplication operator $M_z$ on $oplus L^2(X,mu_i)$, how it looks the case at least for finite dimensional case, how direct sum take cares multiplicity of the eigenvalue that I did not get, Also it is not clear all the measure joined to single measure. Further why cyclic decomposition remembers the spectral multiplicity. Please help. Thanks in advance







share|cite|improve this question













People can tell the question is not up to the mark, but I felt without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras for myself. So can any body help me out clearing the concept of Hahn-Hellinger Theorem, what is the game playing inside the theorem, I tried many books and I am not able to get with clarity. More specifically how cyclic vectors are connected with multiplicity of self-adjoint operator, this theorem say any self-adjoint operator in $mathcalH$ is equivalent to a multiplication operator $M_z$ on $oplus L^2(X,mu_i)$, how it looks the case at least for finite dimensional case, how direct sum take cares multiplicity of the eigenvalue that I did not get, Also it is not clear all the measure joined to single measure. Further why cyclic decomposition remembers the spectral multiplicity. Please help. Thanks in advance









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 20 at 16:41
























asked Jul 20 at 16:10









mathlover

10518




10518







  • 2




    "without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras": a dubious claim, at best. Arguably, it is much easier to approach the spectral theorem via von Neumann algebras, not vice versa. A normal operator N on a Hilbert space H generates a commutative von Neumann algebra A, whose Gelfand spectrum S is a measurable space. Furthermore, H is an A-module, and the category of A-modules is equivalent to the category of Hilbert bundles over S, yielding a Hilbert bundle B over S. The dimensions of fibers of B are precisely spectral multiplicities.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 16:19










  • @Dmitri Pavlov can you please ellaborate how you connecting modules and hilbert bundles. dimension of fibers to spectral theorem, I will be helpful if you give the litle more clarification
    – mathlover
    Jul 21 at 18:38










  • A few more details can be found in my notes dmitripavlov.org/notes/2018s-6325.pdf, see, in particular, 9.11, 9.14, 9.20. Many things in the text are hyperlinked and will lead you to the relevant definitions.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 22:50











  • Thanks for the link.
    – mathlover
    Jul 22 at 4:15












  • 2




    "without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras": a dubious claim, at best. Arguably, it is much easier to approach the spectral theorem via von Neumann algebras, not vice versa. A normal operator N on a Hilbert space H generates a commutative von Neumann algebra A, whose Gelfand spectrum S is a measurable space. Furthermore, H is an A-module, and the category of A-modules is equivalent to the category of Hilbert bundles over S, yielding a Hilbert bundle B over S. The dimensions of fibers of B are precisely spectral multiplicities.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 16:19










  • @Dmitri Pavlov can you please ellaborate how you connecting modules and hilbert bundles. dimension of fibers to spectral theorem, I will be helpful if you give the litle more clarification
    – mathlover
    Jul 21 at 18:38










  • A few more details can be found in my notes dmitripavlov.org/notes/2018s-6325.pdf, see, in particular, 9.11, 9.14, 9.20. Many things in the text are hyperlinked and will lead you to the relevant definitions.
    – Dmitri Pavlov
    Jul 21 at 22:50











  • Thanks for the link.
    – mathlover
    Jul 22 at 4:15







2




2




"without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras": a dubious claim, at best. Arguably, it is much easier to approach the spectral theorem via von Neumann algebras, not vice versa. A normal operator N on a Hilbert space H generates a commutative von Neumann algebra A, whose Gelfand spectrum S is a measurable space. Furthermore, H is an A-module, and the category of A-modules is equivalent to the category of Hilbert bundles over S, yielding a Hilbert bundle B over S. The dimensions of fibers of B are precisely spectral multiplicities.
– Dmitri Pavlov
Jul 21 at 16:19




"without understanding the Hahn-Hellinger Theorem properly there is no point talking von Neumann algebras": a dubious claim, at best. Arguably, it is much easier to approach the spectral theorem via von Neumann algebras, not vice versa. A normal operator N on a Hilbert space H generates a commutative von Neumann algebra A, whose Gelfand spectrum S is a measurable space. Furthermore, H is an A-module, and the category of A-modules is equivalent to the category of Hilbert bundles over S, yielding a Hilbert bundle B over S. The dimensions of fibers of B are precisely spectral multiplicities.
– Dmitri Pavlov
Jul 21 at 16:19












@Dmitri Pavlov can you please ellaborate how you connecting modules and hilbert bundles. dimension of fibers to spectral theorem, I will be helpful if you give the litle more clarification
– mathlover
Jul 21 at 18:38




@Dmitri Pavlov can you please ellaborate how you connecting modules and hilbert bundles. dimension of fibers to spectral theorem, I will be helpful if you give the litle more clarification
– mathlover
Jul 21 at 18:38












A few more details can be found in my notes dmitripavlov.org/notes/2018s-6325.pdf, see, in particular, 9.11, 9.14, 9.20. Many things in the text are hyperlinked and will lead you to the relevant definitions.
– Dmitri Pavlov
Jul 21 at 22:50





A few more details can be found in my notes dmitripavlov.org/notes/2018s-6325.pdf, see, in particular, 9.11, 9.14, 9.20. Many things in the text are hyperlinked and will lead you to the relevant definitions.
– Dmitri Pavlov
Jul 21 at 22:50













Thanks for the link.
– mathlover
Jul 22 at 4:15




Thanks for the link.
– mathlover
Jul 22 at 4:15















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857803%2fthe-hahn-hellinger-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857803%2fthe-hahn-hellinger-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?