Asymptotic behavior of this estimator?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $X$,$Y$ two real valued random variables with distributions absolutely continuous with regard to the Lebesgue measure. Denote their distribution functions $F$ and $G$, and $g=G'$ the probability density function of $Y$.
Using the inverse transform theorem, we have:



beginalign*
Y &= G^-1circ F (X)\
& =: f(X).
endalign*
in distribution. Now, one observes $(X_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. $X$ and $(Y_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. Y. Suppose moreover that $(X_n)_ngeq1$ is independant of $(Y_n)_ngeq1$. Define $hatf_n(x)$ an estimator of $f(x) = G^-1circ F(x)$ for some $xin mathbbR$ as:
beginalign*
hatf_n(x) = G_n^-1circ F_n(x)
endalign*
where $F_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_X_ileq x$ is the empirical c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(X_1, dots, X_n)$ and $G_n^-1$ is the generalized inverse of the c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(Y_1,dots,Y_n)$, i.e. $G_n^-1(alpha) = infx in mathbbR, G_n(x) geq alpha $ where $G_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_Y_ileq x$.



I am interested in the asymptotic behavior of $hatf_n(x)$. One can write:
beginalign*
sqrtn(hatf_n(x) - f(x)) &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
&= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F_n(x))+sqrtn(G^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
&= A_n + B_n quad textsay.
endalign*
Proving stochastic equicontinuity of the process $Z_n(p), p in [0,1]_n geq 1$ where $Z_n(p) = sqrtn(G_n^-1(p) - G^-1(p))$ allows one to prove that $A_n$ converges in distribution to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$ where $sigma^2 = fracF(x)(1-F(x))gcirc f(x)^2$. Moreover the Delta method can be used to prove that $B_n$ converges in distribution also to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$.



Now, note that that $A_n$ and $B_n$ are not independent so we can not conclude that $A_n + B_n$ converges to $mathcalN(0,2sigma^2)$. Nevertheless, numerical simulations are consistent with this.



Any idea on how to prove it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $X$,$Y$ two real valued random variables with distributions absolutely continuous with regard to the Lebesgue measure. Denote their distribution functions $F$ and $G$, and $g=G'$ the probability density function of $Y$.
    Using the inverse transform theorem, we have:



    beginalign*
    Y &= G^-1circ F (X)\
    & =: f(X).
    endalign*
    in distribution. Now, one observes $(X_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. $X$ and $(Y_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. Y. Suppose moreover that $(X_n)_ngeq1$ is independant of $(Y_n)_ngeq1$. Define $hatf_n(x)$ an estimator of $f(x) = G^-1circ F(x)$ for some $xin mathbbR$ as:
    beginalign*
    hatf_n(x) = G_n^-1circ F_n(x)
    endalign*
    where $F_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_X_ileq x$ is the empirical c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(X_1, dots, X_n)$ and $G_n^-1$ is the generalized inverse of the c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(Y_1,dots,Y_n)$, i.e. $G_n^-1(alpha) = infx in mathbbR, G_n(x) geq alpha $ where $G_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_Y_ileq x$.



    I am interested in the asymptotic behavior of $hatf_n(x)$. One can write:
    beginalign*
    sqrtn(hatf_n(x) - f(x)) &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
    &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F_n(x))+sqrtn(G^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
    &= A_n + B_n quad textsay.
    endalign*
    Proving stochastic equicontinuity of the process $Z_n(p), p in [0,1]_n geq 1$ where $Z_n(p) = sqrtn(G_n^-1(p) - G^-1(p))$ allows one to prove that $A_n$ converges in distribution to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$ where $sigma^2 = fracF(x)(1-F(x))gcirc f(x)^2$. Moreover the Delta method can be used to prove that $B_n$ converges in distribution also to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$.



    Now, note that that $A_n$ and $B_n$ are not independent so we can not conclude that $A_n + B_n$ converges to $mathcalN(0,2sigma^2)$. Nevertheless, numerical simulations are consistent with this.



    Any idea on how to prove it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $X$,$Y$ two real valued random variables with distributions absolutely continuous with regard to the Lebesgue measure. Denote their distribution functions $F$ and $G$, and $g=G'$ the probability density function of $Y$.
      Using the inverse transform theorem, we have:



      beginalign*
      Y &= G^-1circ F (X)\
      & =: f(X).
      endalign*
      in distribution. Now, one observes $(X_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. $X$ and $(Y_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. Y. Suppose moreover that $(X_n)_ngeq1$ is independant of $(Y_n)_ngeq1$. Define $hatf_n(x)$ an estimator of $f(x) = G^-1circ F(x)$ for some $xin mathbbR$ as:
      beginalign*
      hatf_n(x) = G_n^-1circ F_n(x)
      endalign*
      where $F_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_X_ileq x$ is the empirical c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(X_1, dots, X_n)$ and $G_n^-1$ is the generalized inverse of the c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(Y_1,dots,Y_n)$, i.e. $G_n^-1(alpha) = infx in mathbbR, G_n(x) geq alpha $ where $G_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_Y_ileq x$.



      I am interested in the asymptotic behavior of $hatf_n(x)$. One can write:
      beginalign*
      sqrtn(hatf_n(x) - f(x)) &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
      &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F_n(x))+sqrtn(G^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
      &= A_n + B_n quad textsay.
      endalign*
      Proving stochastic equicontinuity of the process $Z_n(p), p in [0,1]_n geq 1$ where $Z_n(p) = sqrtn(G_n^-1(p) - G^-1(p))$ allows one to prove that $A_n$ converges in distribution to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$ where $sigma^2 = fracF(x)(1-F(x))gcirc f(x)^2$. Moreover the Delta method can be used to prove that $B_n$ converges in distribution also to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$.



      Now, note that that $A_n$ and $B_n$ are not independent so we can not conclude that $A_n + B_n$ converges to $mathcalN(0,2sigma^2)$. Nevertheless, numerical simulations are consistent with this.



      Any idea on how to prove it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!







      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $X$,$Y$ two real valued random variables with distributions absolutely continuous with regard to the Lebesgue measure. Denote their distribution functions $F$ and $G$, and $g=G'$ the probability density function of $Y$.
      Using the inverse transform theorem, we have:



      beginalign*
      Y &= G^-1circ F (X)\
      & =: f(X).
      endalign*
      in distribution. Now, one observes $(X_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. $X$ and $(Y_n)_ngeq1$ i.i.d. Y. Suppose moreover that $(X_n)_ngeq1$ is independant of $(Y_n)_ngeq1$. Define $hatf_n(x)$ an estimator of $f(x) = G^-1circ F(x)$ for some $xin mathbbR$ as:
      beginalign*
      hatf_n(x) = G_n^-1circ F_n(x)
      endalign*
      where $F_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_X_ileq x$ is the empirical c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(X_1, dots, X_n)$ and $G_n^-1$ is the generalized inverse of the c.d.f. of the $n$-sample $(Y_1,dots,Y_n)$, i.e. $G_n^-1(alpha) = infx in mathbbR, G_n(x) geq alpha $ where $G_n(x)=n^-1sum_i=1^n boldsymbol1_Y_ileq x$.



      I am interested in the asymptotic behavior of $hatf_n(x)$. One can write:
      beginalign*
      sqrtn(hatf_n(x) - f(x)) &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
      &= sqrtn(G_n^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F_n(x))+sqrtn(G^-1circ F_n(x) - G^-1circ F(x))\
      &= A_n + B_n quad textsay.
      endalign*
      Proving stochastic equicontinuity of the process $Z_n(p), p in [0,1]_n geq 1$ where $Z_n(p) = sqrtn(G_n^-1(p) - G^-1(p))$ allows one to prove that $A_n$ converges in distribution to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$ where $sigma^2 = fracF(x)(1-F(x))gcirc f(x)^2$. Moreover the Delta method can be used to prove that $B_n$ converges in distribution also to $mathcalN(0,sigma^2)$.



      Now, note that that $A_n$ and $B_n$ are not independent so we can not conclude that $A_n + B_n$ converges to $mathcalN(0,2sigma^2)$. Nevertheless, numerical simulations are consistent with this.



      Any idea on how to prove it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 3 at 13:50
























      asked Aug 3 at 13:45









      Alfred F.

      385




      385

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871081%2fasymptotic-behavior-of-this-estimator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871081%2fasymptotic-behavior-of-this-estimator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?