Bounding $chi(g)$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For a character $chi$ of a finite group $G$,
$$|chi(g)|leq dim(chi)$$
Obviously the inequality is strict for $g=1$, and if $dim(chi)=1$ also for $gneq 1$.
Is there a better bound for $chi(g)$ if we assume 1) $gneq 1$, and 2) $dim(chi)>1$?
group-theory finite-groups representation-theory characters
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For a character $chi$ of a finite group $G$,
$$|chi(g)|leq dim(chi)$$
Obviously the inequality is strict for $g=1$, and if $dim(chi)=1$ also for $gneq 1$.
Is there a better bound for $chi(g)$ if we assume 1) $gneq 1$, and 2) $dim(chi)>1$?
group-theory finite-groups representation-theory characters
Presumably you mean for $chi$ to be the character of a representation, not the representation itself.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:29
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For a character $chi$ of a finite group $G$,
$$|chi(g)|leq dim(chi)$$
Obviously the inequality is strict for $g=1$, and if $dim(chi)=1$ also for $gneq 1$.
Is there a better bound for $chi(g)$ if we assume 1) $gneq 1$, and 2) $dim(chi)>1$?
group-theory finite-groups representation-theory characters
For a character $chi$ of a finite group $G$,
$$|chi(g)|leq dim(chi)$$
Obviously the inequality is strict for $g=1$, and if $dim(chi)=1$ also for $gneq 1$.
Is there a better bound for $chi(g)$ if we assume 1) $gneq 1$, and 2) $dim(chi)>1$?
group-theory finite-groups representation-theory characters
edited Jul 26 at 2:25
asked Jul 26 at 0:12
Samuel Plath
673213
673213
Presumably you mean for $chi$ to be the character of a representation, not the representation itself.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:29
add a comment |Â
Presumably you mean for $chi$ to be the character of a representation, not the representation itself.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:29
Presumably you mean for $chi$ to be the character of a representation, not the representation itself.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:29
Presumably you mean for $chi$ to be the character of a representation, not the representation itself.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:29
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No. For instance, taking $chi$ to be a sum of $n$ copies of the trivial character for some $n>1$, then $chi(g)=n$ for all $g$.
It also does not help if you assume additionally that $chi$ is irreducible. For instance, let $G=D_8$ and let $chi$ be the character of its usual two-dimensional representation as symmetries of a square. Then $chi$ is an irreducible character of positive dimension. However, if $gin G$ is the element corresponding to a rotation by $180^circ$, then $gneq 1$ and $chi(g)=-2$.
(In fact, more generally, if $gin Z(G)$ and $chi$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, then $|chi(g)|$ is always equal to $dim chi$. This is because the representation must send $g$ to a scalar multiple of the identity, by Schur's lemma.)
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
1
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No. For instance, taking $chi$ to be a sum of $n$ copies of the trivial character for some $n>1$, then $chi(g)=n$ for all $g$.
It also does not help if you assume additionally that $chi$ is irreducible. For instance, let $G=D_8$ and let $chi$ be the character of its usual two-dimensional representation as symmetries of a square. Then $chi$ is an irreducible character of positive dimension. However, if $gin G$ is the element corresponding to a rotation by $180^circ$, then $gneq 1$ and $chi(g)=-2$.
(In fact, more generally, if $gin Z(G)$ and $chi$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, then $|chi(g)|$ is always equal to $dim chi$. This is because the representation must send $g$ to a scalar multiple of the identity, by Schur's lemma.)
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
1
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No. For instance, taking $chi$ to be a sum of $n$ copies of the trivial character for some $n>1$, then $chi(g)=n$ for all $g$.
It also does not help if you assume additionally that $chi$ is irreducible. For instance, let $G=D_8$ and let $chi$ be the character of its usual two-dimensional representation as symmetries of a square. Then $chi$ is an irreducible character of positive dimension. However, if $gin G$ is the element corresponding to a rotation by $180^circ$, then $gneq 1$ and $chi(g)=-2$.
(In fact, more generally, if $gin Z(G)$ and $chi$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, then $|chi(g)|$ is always equal to $dim chi$. This is because the representation must send $g$ to a scalar multiple of the identity, by Schur's lemma.)
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
1
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No. For instance, taking $chi$ to be a sum of $n$ copies of the trivial character for some $n>1$, then $chi(g)=n$ for all $g$.
It also does not help if you assume additionally that $chi$ is irreducible. For instance, let $G=D_8$ and let $chi$ be the character of its usual two-dimensional representation as symmetries of a square. Then $chi$ is an irreducible character of positive dimension. However, if $gin G$ is the element corresponding to a rotation by $180^circ$, then $gneq 1$ and $chi(g)=-2$.
(In fact, more generally, if $gin Z(G)$ and $chi$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, then $|chi(g)|$ is always equal to $dim chi$. This is because the representation must send $g$ to a scalar multiple of the identity, by Schur's lemma.)
No. For instance, taking $chi$ to be a sum of $n$ copies of the trivial character for some $n>1$, then $chi(g)=n$ for all $g$.
It also does not help if you assume additionally that $chi$ is irreducible. For instance, let $G=D_8$ and let $chi$ be the character of its usual two-dimensional representation as symmetries of a square. Then $chi$ is an irreducible character of positive dimension. However, if $gin G$ is the element corresponding to a rotation by $180^circ$, then $gneq 1$ and $chi(g)=-2$.
(In fact, more generally, if $gin Z(G)$ and $chi$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, then $|chi(g)|$ is always equal to $dim chi$. This is because the representation must send $g$ to a scalar multiple of the identity, by Schur's lemma.)
edited Jul 26 at 1:01
answered Jul 26 at 0:28
Eric Wofsey
162k12189300
162k12189300
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
1
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
add a comment |Â
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
1
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
Your example is for real irreducible character. I am curious to know about complex irred characters.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:30
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
My example is irreducible over $mathbbC$. If it were reducible, it would be a sum of 1-dimensional representations and thus the image of the representation would be abelian.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:33
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
Yes. I got confused with cyclic groups 2-dim real irred representation. Thanks for being kind to my impatient remark.
– P Vanchinathan
Jul 26 at 0:45
1
1
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
Perhaps also worth noting that the set $chi(g)$ is called the center of the character, and the center of the group is the intersections of the centers of the characters.
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jul 26 at 5:30
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862955%2fbounding-chig%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Presumably you mean for $chi$ to be the character of a representation, not the representation itself.
– Eric Wofsey
Jul 26 at 0:29