Showing that $−i(U − E)(U + E)^-1$ is a Hermitian matrix.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Given $U in mathbbC^n times n$ a unitary Matrix that doesn't have $-1$ as an Eigenvalue.



I am trying show that $U + I$ is invertiable and that $−i(U − E)(U + E)^-1$ is a Hermitian matrix.



Let $lambda$ be an Eigenvalue of $U$
It follows that the Eigenvalues of $U + I$ have the form $lambda+1$. Since $lambda neq -1$ then $U + I$ doesn't have zero as an Eigenvalue and therefore invertiable. (Is this correct?)



Let $B = −i(U − I)(U + I)^-1 = (-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1$



We can show that $B^H = B$ or $B^T = overlineB$



$$overlineB = overline(-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1 = (-i overlineU - i I)(overlineU + I)^-1$$
$$B^T = (U^T + I)^-1(-i U^T + i I)$$



There is where I get stuck. Not sure how to relate $U^T$ and $overlineU$







share|cite|improve this question



















  • $U$ is unitary. What does that tell you about $U^T$ and $overlineU$?
    – Kolja
    Jul 16 at 23:38











  • I am not really sure. Is $U^T = U$ ?
    – yarafoudah
    Jul 16 at 23:47











  • It's $U^H=U^-1$.
    – Kolja
    Jul 17 at 10:12










  • What are the constraints on $E$ as a matrix?
    – Xoque55
    Jul 17 at 15:03














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Given $U in mathbbC^n times n$ a unitary Matrix that doesn't have $-1$ as an Eigenvalue.



I am trying show that $U + I$ is invertiable and that $−i(U − E)(U + E)^-1$ is a Hermitian matrix.



Let $lambda$ be an Eigenvalue of $U$
It follows that the Eigenvalues of $U + I$ have the form $lambda+1$. Since $lambda neq -1$ then $U + I$ doesn't have zero as an Eigenvalue and therefore invertiable. (Is this correct?)



Let $B = −i(U − I)(U + I)^-1 = (-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1$



We can show that $B^H = B$ or $B^T = overlineB$



$$overlineB = overline(-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1 = (-i overlineU - i I)(overlineU + I)^-1$$
$$B^T = (U^T + I)^-1(-i U^T + i I)$$



There is where I get stuck. Not sure how to relate $U^T$ and $overlineU$







share|cite|improve this question



















  • $U$ is unitary. What does that tell you about $U^T$ and $overlineU$?
    – Kolja
    Jul 16 at 23:38











  • I am not really sure. Is $U^T = U$ ?
    – yarafoudah
    Jul 16 at 23:47











  • It's $U^H=U^-1$.
    – Kolja
    Jul 17 at 10:12










  • What are the constraints on $E$ as a matrix?
    – Xoque55
    Jul 17 at 15:03












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Given $U in mathbbC^n times n$ a unitary Matrix that doesn't have $-1$ as an Eigenvalue.



I am trying show that $U + I$ is invertiable and that $−i(U − E)(U + E)^-1$ is a Hermitian matrix.



Let $lambda$ be an Eigenvalue of $U$
It follows that the Eigenvalues of $U + I$ have the form $lambda+1$. Since $lambda neq -1$ then $U + I$ doesn't have zero as an Eigenvalue and therefore invertiable. (Is this correct?)



Let $B = −i(U − I)(U + I)^-1 = (-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1$



We can show that $B^H = B$ or $B^T = overlineB$



$$overlineB = overline(-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1 = (-i overlineU - i I)(overlineU + I)^-1$$
$$B^T = (U^T + I)^-1(-i U^T + i I)$$



There is where I get stuck. Not sure how to relate $U^T$ and $overlineU$







share|cite|improve this question











Given $U in mathbbC^n times n$ a unitary Matrix that doesn't have $-1$ as an Eigenvalue.



I am trying show that $U + I$ is invertiable and that $−i(U − E)(U + E)^-1$ is a Hermitian matrix.



Let $lambda$ be an Eigenvalue of $U$
It follows that the Eigenvalues of $U + I$ have the form $lambda+1$. Since $lambda neq -1$ then $U + I$ doesn't have zero as an Eigenvalue and therefore invertiable. (Is this correct?)



Let $B = −i(U − I)(U + I)^-1 = (-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1$



We can show that $B^H = B$ or $B^T = overlineB$



$$overlineB = overline(-iU + iI)(U + I)^-1 = (-i overlineU - i I)(overlineU + I)^-1$$
$$B^T = (U^T + I)^-1(-i U^T + i I)$$



There is where I get stuck. Not sure how to relate $U^T$ and $overlineU$









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 16 at 23:24









yarafoudah

846




846











  • $U$ is unitary. What does that tell you about $U^T$ and $overlineU$?
    – Kolja
    Jul 16 at 23:38











  • I am not really sure. Is $U^T = U$ ?
    – yarafoudah
    Jul 16 at 23:47











  • It's $U^H=U^-1$.
    – Kolja
    Jul 17 at 10:12










  • What are the constraints on $E$ as a matrix?
    – Xoque55
    Jul 17 at 15:03
















  • $U$ is unitary. What does that tell you about $U^T$ and $overlineU$?
    – Kolja
    Jul 16 at 23:38











  • I am not really sure. Is $U^T = U$ ?
    – yarafoudah
    Jul 16 at 23:47











  • It's $U^H=U^-1$.
    – Kolja
    Jul 17 at 10:12










  • What are the constraints on $E$ as a matrix?
    – Xoque55
    Jul 17 at 15:03















$U$ is unitary. What does that tell you about $U^T$ and $overlineU$?
– Kolja
Jul 16 at 23:38





$U$ is unitary. What does that tell you about $U^T$ and $overlineU$?
– Kolja
Jul 16 at 23:38













I am not really sure. Is $U^T = U$ ?
– yarafoudah
Jul 16 at 23:47





I am not really sure. Is $U^T = U$ ?
– yarafoudah
Jul 16 at 23:47













It's $U^H=U^-1$.
– Kolja
Jul 17 at 10:12




It's $U^H=U^-1$.
– Kolja
Jul 17 at 10:12












What are the constraints on $E$ as a matrix?
– Xoque55
Jul 17 at 15:03




What are the constraints on $E$ as a matrix?
– Xoque55
Jul 17 at 15:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Since a unitary matrix is normal, it is unitarily diagonalizable. So all that needs to be shown is that if $|lambda|=1$, $lambdane-1$, then
$$
-i,fraclambda-1lambda+1in mathbb R.
$$
For this,
$$
-i,fraclambda-1lambda+1
=-i,frac(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)lambda+1,
$$
so we only care about the numerator now. And
$$
-i(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)=-i(|lambda|^2-1+lambda-barlambda)=-i(lambda-barlambda)=2operatornameImlambdainmathbb R.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853957%2fshowing-that-%25e2%2588%2592iu-%25e2%2588%2592-eu-e-1-is-a-hermitian-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Since a unitary matrix is normal, it is unitarily diagonalizable. So all that needs to be shown is that if $|lambda|=1$, $lambdane-1$, then
    $$
    -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1in mathbb R.
    $$
    For this,
    $$
    -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1
    =-i,frac(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)lambda+1,
    $$
    so we only care about the numerator now. And
    $$
    -i(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)=-i(|lambda|^2-1+lambda-barlambda)=-i(lambda-barlambda)=2operatornameImlambdainmathbb R.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Since a unitary matrix is normal, it is unitarily diagonalizable. So all that needs to be shown is that if $|lambda|=1$, $lambdane-1$, then
      $$
      -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1in mathbb R.
      $$
      For this,
      $$
      -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1
      =-i,frac(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)lambda+1,
      $$
      so we only care about the numerator now. And
      $$
      -i(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)=-i(|lambda|^2-1+lambda-barlambda)=-i(lambda-barlambda)=2operatornameImlambdainmathbb R.
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Since a unitary matrix is normal, it is unitarily diagonalizable. So all that needs to be shown is that if $|lambda|=1$, $lambdane-1$, then
        $$
        -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1in mathbb R.
        $$
        For this,
        $$
        -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1
        =-i,frac(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)lambda+1,
        $$
        so we only care about the numerator now. And
        $$
        -i(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)=-i(|lambda|^2-1+lambda-barlambda)=-i(lambda-barlambda)=2operatornameImlambdainmathbb R.
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Since a unitary matrix is normal, it is unitarily diagonalizable. So all that needs to be shown is that if $|lambda|=1$, $lambdane-1$, then
        $$
        -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1in mathbb R.
        $$
        For this,
        $$
        -i,fraclambda-1lambda+1
        =-i,frac(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)lambda+1,
        $$
        so we only care about the numerator now. And
        $$
        -i(lambda-1)(barlambda+1)=-i(|lambda|^2-1+lambda-barlambda)=-i(lambda-barlambda)=2operatornameImlambdainmathbb R.
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 17 at 15:00









        Martin Argerami

        116k1071164




        116k1071164






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853957%2fshowing-that-%25e2%2588%2592iu-%25e2%2588%2592-eu-e-1-is-a-hermitian-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?