Confusion about the dual norm

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Consider $mathbbR^2$ with inner product $langle x,yrangle_A = x^T A y$, where $A$ is diagonal positive definite, i.e. $A = beginpmatrix a & 0\ 0 & bendpmatrixquad a,b >0$. To compute the dual norm of this norm, according to The Riesz representation theorem, we can compute $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T A x$, this gives $|z|^* = |z|_A = sqrtaz_1^2 + bz_2^2$.



My question is why cannot we compute the dual norm using $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T x$. In this case, the "dual norm" would be $|z|^* = sqrtfracz_1^2a+fracz_2^2b$. Specifically, given an element $z$ in the dual space, what is wrong with defining $z(x) = z^Tx$ instead of $z(x) = z^T A x$ ?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Presumably $z$ is an element of the dual space here. Riesz says that there is some $z^* in mathbbR^2$ such that $ z(x) = langle z^*, x rangle_A = (z^*)^T Ax$. Hence $|z| = sup__A le 1 z(x) = sup__A le 1 (z^*)^T Ax$. The functional $z$ and its representation $z^*$ depend on the inner product used
    – copper.hat
    Jul 16 at 16:49















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Consider $mathbbR^2$ with inner product $langle x,yrangle_A = x^T A y$, where $A$ is diagonal positive definite, i.e. $A = beginpmatrix a & 0\ 0 & bendpmatrixquad a,b >0$. To compute the dual norm of this norm, according to The Riesz representation theorem, we can compute $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T A x$, this gives $|z|^* = |z|_A = sqrtaz_1^2 + bz_2^2$.



My question is why cannot we compute the dual norm using $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T x$. In this case, the "dual norm" would be $|z|^* = sqrtfracz_1^2a+fracz_2^2b$. Specifically, given an element $z$ in the dual space, what is wrong with defining $z(x) = z^Tx$ instead of $z(x) = z^T A x$ ?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Presumably $z$ is an element of the dual space here. Riesz says that there is some $z^* in mathbbR^2$ such that $ z(x) = langle z^*, x rangle_A = (z^*)^T Ax$. Hence $|z| = sup__A le 1 z(x) = sup__A le 1 (z^*)^T Ax$. The functional $z$ and its representation $z^*$ depend on the inner product used
    – copper.hat
    Jul 16 at 16:49













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Consider $mathbbR^2$ with inner product $langle x,yrangle_A = x^T A y$, where $A$ is diagonal positive definite, i.e. $A = beginpmatrix a & 0\ 0 & bendpmatrixquad a,b >0$. To compute the dual norm of this norm, according to The Riesz representation theorem, we can compute $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T A x$, this gives $|z|^* = |z|_A = sqrtaz_1^2 + bz_2^2$.



My question is why cannot we compute the dual norm using $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T x$. In this case, the "dual norm" would be $|z|^* = sqrtfracz_1^2a+fracz_2^2b$. Specifically, given an element $z$ in the dual space, what is wrong with defining $z(x) = z^Tx$ instead of $z(x) = z^T A x$ ?







share|cite|improve this question











Consider $mathbbR^2$ with inner product $langle x,yrangle_A = x^T A y$, where $A$ is diagonal positive definite, i.e. $A = beginpmatrix a & 0\ 0 & bendpmatrixquad a,b >0$. To compute the dual norm of this norm, according to The Riesz representation theorem, we can compute $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T A x$, this gives $|z|^* = |z|_A = sqrtaz_1^2 + bz_2^2$.



My question is why cannot we compute the dual norm using $|z|^* = underset_A = 1mathrmmax z^T x$. In this case, the "dual norm" would be $|z|^* = sqrtfracz_1^2a+fracz_2^2b$. Specifically, given an element $z$ in the dual space, what is wrong with defining $z(x) = z^Tx$ instead of $z(x) = z^T A x$ ?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 16 at 15:54









Sean Ian

545




545











  • Presumably $z$ is an element of the dual space here. Riesz says that there is some $z^* in mathbbR^2$ such that $ z(x) = langle z^*, x rangle_A = (z^*)^T Ax$. Hence $|z| = sup__A le 1 z(x) = sup__A le 1 (z^*)^T Ax$. The functional $z$ and its representation $z^*$ depend on the inner product used
    – copper.hat
    Jul 16 at 16:49

















  • Presumably $z$ is an element of the dual space here. Riesz says that there is some $z^* in mathbbR^2$ such that $ z(x) = langle z^*, x rangle_A = (z^*)^T Ax$. Hence $|z| = sup__A le 1 z(x) = sup__A le 1 (z^*)^T Ax$. The functional $z$ and its representation $z^*$ depend on the inner product used
    – copper.hat
    Jul 16 at 16:49
















Presumably $z$ is an element of the dual space here. Riesz says that there is some $z^* in mathbbR^2$ such that $ z(x) = langle z^*, x rangle_A = (z^*)^T Ax$. Hence $|z| = sup__A le 1 z(x) = sup__A le 1 (z^*)^T Ax$. The functional $z$ and its representation $z^*$ depend on the inner product used
– copper.hat
Jul 16 at 16:49





Presumably $z$ is an element of the dual space here. Riesz says that there is some $z^* in mathbbR^2$ such that $ z(x) = langle z^*, x rangle_A = (z^*)^T Ax$. Hence $|z| = sup__A le 1 z(x) = sup__A le 1 (z^*)^T Ax$. The functional $z$ and its representation $z^*$ depend on the inner product used
– copper.hat
Jul 16 at 16:49











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Suppose you have some functional $zeta(x) = f^T x$. Suppose $A>0$ is symmetric
and define the $A$ inner product as above. Then $zeta(x) = (A^-1f)^T Ax$, and so the Riesz representation of $zeta$ with respect to the $A$ inner product is
$A^-1f$.



Then $|zeta| = sup__A le 1 zeta(x) = sup__A le 1 langle A^-1 f, xrangle_A = |A^-1 f|_A = sqrtf^T A^-1 f$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853533%2fconfusion-about-the-dual-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Suppose you have some functional $zeta(x) = f^T x$. Suppose $A>0$ is symmetric
    and define the $A$ inner product as above. Then $zeta(x) = (A^-1f)^T Ax$, and so the Riesz representation of $zeta$ with respect to the $A$ inner product is
    $A^-1f$.



    Then $|zeta| = sup__A le 1 zeta(x) = sup__A le 1 langle A^-1 f, xrangle_A = |A^-1 f|_A = sqrtf^T A^-1 f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Suppose you have some functional $zeta(x) = f^T x$. Suppose $A>0$ is symmetric
      and define the $A$ inner product as above. Then $zeta(x) = (A^-1f)^T Ax$, and so the Riesz representation of $zeta$ with respect to the $A$ inner product is
      $A^-1f$.



      Then $|zeta| = sup__A le 1 zeta(x) = sup__A le 1 langle A^-1 f, xrangle_A = |A^-1 f|_A = sqrtf^T A^-1 f$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Suppose you have some functional $zeta(x) = f^T x$. Suppose $A>0$ is symmetric
        and define the $A$ inner product as above. Then $zeta(x) = (A^-1f)^T Ax$, and so the Riesz representation of $zeta$ with respect to the $A$ inner product is
        $A^-1f$.



        Then $|zeta| = sup__A le 1 zeta(x) = sup__A le 1 langle A^-1 f, xrangle_A = |A^-1 f|_A = sqrtf^T A^-1 f$.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Suppose you have some functional $zeta(x) = f^T x$. Suppose $A>0$ is symmetric
        and define the $A$ inner product as above. Then $zeta(x) = (A^-1f)^T Ax$, and so the Riesz representation of $zeta$ with respect to the $A$ inner product is
        $A^-1f$.



        Then $|zeta| = sup__A le 1 zeta(x) = sup__A le 1 langle A^-1 f, xrangle_A = |A^-1 f|_A = sqrtf^T A^-1 f$.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 16 at 20:09









        copper.hat

        122k557156




        122k557156






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853533%2fconfusion-about-the-dual-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?