Random Variable vs data vs random sample
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have a problem understanding the difference between random variable and random sample. I have read this thread, but still it is unclear.
According to wiki random variable is a function that from a set of outcomes (events) to measurable values $Omega$ ->$E$ where $E$ could be $mathbbR$. And random sample is a possible outcome.
So I have in a script this sentence which confuses me: let $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$ be a set of random variables. Now I want to make a sample for myself what $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ could be.
Let's take the sample of two dices where we want to compute the probability of the sum of the figures of dices we have thrown. So we construct a random variable $X$ which just adds the thrown number of the dices:
$$X:OmegatomathbbN$$
$$X(textdice_1,textdice_2) = textdice_1 + textdice_2 $$
Where dice are uniformly distributed in $ 1,cdots,6 $.
And as far I know, if I throw two dices, I have concrete values which are my random samples.
Now my concrete question is: what could be in this specific example a set of random variables $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$? And what are then the concrete random samples?
UPDATE:
After reading the comments and replies, I want to underline, that I have a specific question and I would appreciate if someone could answer it explicitly:
In the above example please give me a concrete $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ as a set of random variables. I want to see how a set of random variables $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ (more than 2 random variables) would look like in this example.
probability random-variables
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have a problem understanding the difference between random variable and random sample. I have read this thread, but still it is unclear.
According to wiki random variable is a function that from a set of outcomes (events) to measurable values $Omega$ ->$E$ where $E$ could be $mathbbR$. And random sample is a possible outcome.
So I have in a script this sentence which confuses me: let $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$ be a set of random variables. Now I want to make a sample for myself what $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ could be.
Let's take the sample of two dices where we want to compute the probability of the sum of the figures of dices we have thrown. So we construct a random variable $X$ which just adds the thrown number of the dices:
$$X:OmegatomathbbN$$
$$X(textdice_1,textdice_2) = textdice_1 + textdice_2 $$
Where dice are uniformly distributed in $ 1,cdots,6 $.
And as far I know, if I throw two dices, I have concrete values which are my random samples.
Now my concrete question is: what could be in this specific example a set of random variables $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$? And what are then the concrete random samples?
UPDATE:
After reading the comments and replies, I want to underline, that I have a specific question and I would appreciate if someone could answer it explicitly:
In the above example please give me a concrete $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ as a set of random variables. I want to see how a set of random variables $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ (more than 2 random variables) would look like in this example.
probability random-variables
It is important to be aware of the fact that there is a reality and a probabilistic model of the reality. The probabilistic model is usually a probability space $(Omega,mathcal A, P)$. On this space we can define random variables $X_1,dots,X_n$ and "taking a random sample" can be interpreted as picking out some outcome $omegainOmega$ (according to rules that are determined by the probability measure $P$) and then having a look at the values $X_1(omega),dots,X_n(omega)$. The reality that corresponds with this picking out can be for instance throwing $n$ times a die.
â drhab
Jul 16 at 19:04
@drhab So in this example a set $D=x_1,x_2...x_n$ would be the outcome of throwing n times a die?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:39
In your example I would go for $Omega=(i,j)mid i,jin1,2,3,4,5,6$ and $X_1,X_2$ prescribed respecively by $(i,j)mapsto i$ and $(i,j)mapsto j$. Then you have the random variables $X_1,X_2$ and every outcome $(i,j)$ induces the result of taking a sample: $(X_1(i,j),X_2(i,j))=(i,j)$. It might look redundant because in this simplistic example we get $(X_1,X_2)(omega)=omega$ so the outcome turns up again, but in more complicated situation with lots of data that will be different. Our interest is not in single outcomes but in events like $omegainOmegamid X(omega)in B$.
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:43
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have a problem understanding the difference between random variable and random sample. I have read this thread, but still it is unclear.
According to wiki random variable is a function that from a set of outcomes (events) to measurable values $Omega$ ->$E$ where $E$ could be $mathbbR$. And random sample is a possible outcome.
So I have in a script this sentence which confuses me: let $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$ be a set of random variables. Now I want to make a sample for myself what $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ could be.
Let's take the sample of two dices where we want to compute the probability of the sum of the figures of dices we have thrown. So we construct a random variable $X$ which just adds the thrown number of the dices:
$$X:OmegatomathbbN$$
$$X(textdice_1,textdice_2) = textdice_1 + textdice_2 $$
Where dice are uniformly distributed in $ 1,cdots,6 $.
And as far I know, if I throw two dices, I have concrete values which are my random samples.
Now my concrete question is: what could be in this specific example a set of random variables $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$? And what are then the concrete random samples?
UPDATE:
After reading the comments and replies, I want to underline, that I have a specific question and I would appreciate if someone could answer it explicitly:
In the above example please give me a concrete $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ as a set of random variables. I want to see how a set of random variables $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ (more than 2 random variables) would look like in this example.
probability random-variables
I have a problem understanding the difference between random variable and random sample. I have read this thread, but still it is unclear.
According to wiki random variable is a function that from a set of outcomes (events) to measurable values $Omega$ ->$E$ where $E$ could be $mathbbR$. And random sample is a possible outcome.
So I have in a script this sentence which confuses me: let $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$ be a set of random variables. Now I want to make a sample for myself what $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ could be.
Let's take the sample of two dices where we want to compute the probability of the sum of the figures of dices we have thrown. So we construct a random variable $X$ which just adds the thrown number of the dices:
$$X:OmegatomathbbN$$
$$X(textdice_1,textdice_2) = textdice_1 + textdice_2 $$
Where dice are uniformly distributed in $ 1,cdots,6 $.
And as far I know, if I throw two dices, I have concrete values which are my random samples.
Now my concrete question is: what could be in this specific example a set of random variables $D=x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n$? And what are then the concrete random samples?
UPDATE:
After reading the comments and replies, I want to underline, that I have a specific question and I would appreciate if someone could answer it explicitly:
In the above example please give me a concrete $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ as a set of random variables. I want to see how a set of random variables $D = x_1,x_2,...,x_n$ (more than 2 random variables) would look like in this example.
probability random-variables
edited Jul 17 at 9:52
asked Jul 16 at 17:35
Mo Prog
1307
1307
It is important to be aware of the fact that there is a reality and a probabilistic model of the reality. The probabilistic model is usually a probability space $(Omega,mathcal A, P)$. On this space we can define random variables $X_1,dots,X_n$ and "taking a random sample" can be interpreted as picking out some outcome $omegainOmega$ (according to rules that are determined by the probability measure $P$) and then having a look at the values $X_1(omega),dots,X_n(omega)$. The reality that corresponds with this picking out can be for instance throwing $n$ times a die.
â drhab
Jul 16 at 19:04
@drhab So in this example a set $D=x_1,x_2...x_n$ would be the outcome of throwing n times a die?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:39
In your example I would go for $Omega=(i,j)mid i,jin1,2,3,4,5,6$ and $X_1,X_2$ prescribed respecively by $(i,j)mapsto i$ and $(i,j)mapsto j$. Then you have the random variables $X_1,X_2$ and every outcome $(i,j)$ induces the result of taking a sample: $(X_1(i,j),X_2(i,j))=(i,j)$. It might look redundant because in this simplistic example we get $(X_1,X_2)(omega)=omega$ so the outcome turns up again, but in more complicated situation with lots of data that will be different. Our interest is not in single outcomes but in events like $omegainOmegamid X(omega)in B$.
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:43
add a comment |Â
It is important to be aware of the fact that there is a reality and a probabilistic model of the reality. The probabilistic model is usually a probability space $(Omega,mathcal A, P)$. On this space we can define random variables $X_1,dots,X_n$ and "taking a random sample" can be interpreted as picking out some outcome $omegainOmega$ (according to rules that are determined by the probability measure $P$) and then having a look at the values $X_1(omega),dots,X_n(omega)$. The reality that corresponds with this picking out can be for instance throwing $n$ times a die.
â drhab
Jul 16 at 19:04
@drhab So in this example a set $D=x_1,x_2...x_n$ would be the outcome of throwing n times a die?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:39
In your example I would go for $Omega=(i,j)mid i,jin1,2,3,4,5,6$ and $X_1,X_2$ prescribed respecively by $(i,j)mapsto i$ and $(i,j)mapsto j$. Then you have the random variables $X_1,X_2$ and every outcome $(i,j)$ induces the result of taking a sample: $(X_1(i,j),X_2(i,j))=(i,j)$. It might look redundant because in this simplistic example we get $(X_1,X_2)(omega)=omega$ so the outcome turns up again, but in more complicated situation with lots of data that will be different. Our interest is not in single outcomes but in events like $omegainOmegamid X(omega)in B$.
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:43
It is important to be aware of the fact that there is a reality and a probabilistic model of the reality. The probabilistic model is usually a probability space $(Omega,mathcal A, P)$. On this space we can define random variables $X_1,dots,X_n$ and "taking a random sample" can be interpreted as picking out some outcome $omegainOmega$ (according to rules that are determined by the probability measure $P$) and then having a look at the values $X_1(omega),dots,X_n(omega)$. The reality that corresponds with this picking out can be for instance throwing $n$ times a die.
â drhab
Jul 16 at 19:04
It is important to be aware of the fact that there is a reality and a probabilistic model of the reality. The probabilistic model is usually a probability space $(Omega,mathcal A, P)$. On this space we can define random variables $X_1,dots,X_n$ and "taking a random sample" can be interpreted as picking out some outcome $omegainOmega$ (according to rules that are determined by the probability measure $P$) and then having a look at the values $X_1(omega),dots,X_n(omega)$. The reality that corresponds with this picking out can be for instance throwing $n$ times a die.
â drhab
Jul 16 at 19:04
@drhab So in this example a set $D=x_1,x_2...x_n$ would be the outcome of throwing n times a die?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:39
@drhab So in this example a set $D=x_1,x_2...x_n$ would be the outcome of throwing n times a die?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:39
In your example I would go for $Omega=(i,j)mid i,jin1,2,3,4,5,6$ and $X_1,X_2$ prescribed respecively by $(i,j)mapsto i$ and $(i,j)mapsto j$. Then you have the random variables $X_1,X_2$ and every outcome $(i,j)$ induces the result of taking a sample: $(X_1(i,j),X_2(i,j))=(i,j)$. It might look redundant because in this simplistic example we get $(X_1,X_2)(omega)=omega$ so the outcome turns up again, but in more complicated situation with lots of data that will be different. Our interest is not in single outcomes but in events like $omegainOmegamid X(omega)in B$.
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:43
In your example I would go for $Omega=(i,j)mid i,jin1,2,3,4,5,6$ and $X_1,X_2$ prescribed respecively by $(i,j)mapsto i$ and $(i,j)mapsto j$. Then you have the random variables $X_1,X_2$ and every outcome $(i,j)$ induces the result of taking a sample: $(X_1(i,j),X_2(i,j))=(i,j)$. It might look redundant because in this simplistic example we get $(X_1,X_2)(omega)=omega$ so the outcome turns up again, but in more complicated situation with lots of data that will be different. Our interest is not in single outcomes but in events like $omegainOmegamid X(omega)in B$.
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:43
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
This Three Things are totally different let's talk about them one by one
1.Random Variable: Suppose 'x' is a random variable so it can take any value from a positive number system like 1,2,3,4,5....... and so on
There are two types of random variables:
1.discret: which takes discrete value or we can say exact no like 1,2,3,4...
2.continuous: Which Takes Values like from 1 to 10 so we can say it may be 1.1111 or 3.444 or maybe 9.867545 anything
2.Data: Data Means Collection of lots of variables which has some labels
like data of maturity in different ages
age-group: [1-10] [10-20]
maturity:-- [0.1] [0.2]
So this is Data By which We can Get to the some specific result
3.Random Sample: Part Randomly Taken From Data We can say if we have a large amount of data we can not study on whole data then we take random part of data and them to study on that
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
This Three Things are totally different let's talk about them one by one
1.Random Variable: Suppose 'x' is a random variable so it can take any value from a positive number system like 1,2,3,4,5....... and so on
There are two types of random variables:
1.discret: which takes discrete value or we can say exact no like 1,2,3,4...
2.continuous: Which Takes Values like from 1 to 10 so we can say it may be 1.1111 or 3.444 or maybe 9.867545 anything
2.Data: Data Means Collection of lots of variables which has some labels
like data of maturity in different ages
age-group: [1-10] [10-20]
maturity:-- [0.1] [0.2]
So this is Data By which We can Get to the some specific result
3.Random Sample: Part Randomly Taken From Data We can say if we have a large amount of data we can not study on whole data then we take random part of data and them to study on that
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
This Three Things are totally different let's talk about them one by one
1.Random Variable: Suppose 'x' is a random variable so it can take any value from a positive number system like 1,2,3,4,5....... and so on
There are two types of random variables:
1.discret: which takes discrete value or we can say exact no like 1,2,3,4...
2.continuous: Which Takes Values like from 1 to 10 so we can say it may be 1.1111 or 3.444 or maybe 9.867545 anything
2.Data: Data Means Collection of lots of variables which has some labels
like data of maturity in different ages
age-group: [1-10] [10-20]
maturity:-- [0.1] [0.2]
So this is Data By which We can Get to the some specific result
3.Random Sample: Part Randomly Taken From Data We can say if we have a large amount of data we can not study on whole data then we take random part of data and them to study on that
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This Three Things are totally different let's talk about them one by one
1.Random Variable: Suppose 'x' is a random variable so it can take any value from a positive number system like 1,2,3,4,5....... and so on
There are two types of random variables:
1.discret: which takes discrete value or we can say exact no like 1,2,3,4...
2.continuous: Which Takes Values like from 1 to 10 so we can say it may be 1.1111 or 3.444 or maybe 9.867545 anything
2.Data: Data Means Collection of lots of variables which has some labels
like data of maturity in different ages
age-group: [1-10] [10-20]
maturity:-- [0.1] [0.2]
So this is Data By which We can Get to the some specific result
3.Random Sample: Part Randomly Taken From Data We can say if we have a large amount of data we can not study on whole data then we take random part of data and them to study on that
This Three Things are totally different let's talk about them one by one
1.Random Variable: Suppose 'x' is a random variable so it can take any value from a positive number system like 1,2,3,4,5....... and so on
There are two types of random variables:
1.discret: which takes discrete value or we can say exact no like 1,2,3,4...
2.continuous: Which Takes Values like from 1 to 10 so we can say it may be 1.1111 or 3.444 or maybe 9.867545 anything
2.Data: Data Means Collection of lots of variables which has some labels
like data of maturity in different ages
age-group: [1-10] [10-20]
maturity:-- [0.1] [0.2]
So this is Data By which We can Get to the some specific result
3.Random Sample: Part Randomly Taken From Data We can say if we have a large amount of data we can not study on whole data then we take random part of data and them to study on that
answered Jul 16 at 19:42
Parag Jain
86
86
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
add a comment |Â
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
Can you please now give an example what a set of random variables $x_1,x_2,...x_n$ in my example is?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:37
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
I would call this "the answer of a statistician" (so with strong focus on reality, and less on the probabilistic model that makes it possible to apply mathematics).
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:51
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853645%2frandom-variable-vs-data-vs-random-sample%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
It is important to be aware of the fact that there is a reality and a probabilistic model of the reality. The probabilistic model is usually a probability space $(Omega,mathcal A, P)$. On this space we can define random variables $X_1,dots,X_n$ and "taking a random sample" can be interpreted as picking out some outcome $omegainOmega$ (according to rules that are determined by the probability measure $P$) and then having a look at the values $X_1(omega),dots,X_n(omega)$. The reality that corresponds with this picking out can be for instance throwing $n$ times a die.
â drhab
Jul 16 at 19:04
@drhab So in this example a set $D=x_1,x_2...x_n$ would be the outcome of throwing n times a die?
â Mo Prog
Jul 16 at 22:39
In your example I would go for $Omega=(i,j)mid i,jin1,2,3,4,5,6$ and $X_1,X_2$ prescribed respecively by $(i,j)mapsto i$ and $(i,j)mapsto j$. Then you have the random variables $X_1,X_2$ and every outcome $(i,j)$ induces the result of taking a sample: $(X_1(i,j),X_2(i,j))=(i,j)$. It might look redundant because in this simplistic example we get $(X_1,X_2)(omega)=omega$ so the outcome turns up again, but in more complicated situation with lots of data that will be different. Our interest is not in single outcomes but in events like $omegainOmegamid X(omega)in B$.
â drhab
Jul 17 at 8:43