Factorize $ (kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz) $ [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I tried opening the brackets but it keeps getting complex and complex. Does anyone have any easier way of doing it. Please tell how did you observe.
algebra-precalculus contest-math
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Jul 17 at 3:53
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I tried opening the brackets but it keeps getting complex and complex. Does anyone have any easier way of doing it. Please tell how did you observe.
algebra-precalculus contest-math
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Jul 17 at 3:53
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I tried opening the brackets but it keeps getting complex and complex. Does anyone have any easier way of doing it. Please tell how did you observe.
algebra-precalculus contest-math
I tried opening the brackets but it keeps getting complex and complex. Does anyone have any easier way of doing it. Please tell how did you observe.
algebra-precalculus contest-math
asked Jul 16 at 17:10
Harsh Katara
458
458
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Jul 17 at 3:53
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel
closed as off-topic by Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Jul 17 at 3:53
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." â Alex Francisco, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$ f(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz) tag 1$$
Name the six terms respectively as :
$$f(x,y,z,k)=A*B*C-a*b*c$$
If $k=1$ we have $A=c$ , $B=b$ and $C=b$ thus $ABC=abc$ and $f(x,y,z,1)=0$. As a consequence $(k-1)$ is a factor of $f(x,y,z,k)$.
Do the same with $k=-1$ which leads to $f(x,y,z,-1)=0$ then a second factor $(k+1)$.
Proceeding on the same manner successively with $x=y$ , $y=z$ , and $z=x$ gives three other factors : $(x-y)$ , $(y-z)$ and $(z-x)$.
Finally
$$f(x,y,z,k)=-2(k-1)(k+1)(x-y)(y-z)(z-x)tag 2$$
The coefficient $-2$ is obtained in giving an arbitrary value to each $x,y,z,k$ , of course so that $fneq 0$ , and comparing the values of Eq.$(1)$ and Eq.$(2)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Let $$P(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz).$$
Prove that $$P(x,x,z,k)=P(x,y,x,k)=P(x,y,y,k)=P(x,y,z,pm 1)=0.$$
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$ f(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz) tag 1$$
Name the six terms respectively as :
$$f(x,y,z,k)=A*B*C-a*b*c$$
If $k=1$ we have $A=c$ , $B=b$ and $C=b$ thus $ABC=abc$ and $f(x,y,z,1)=0$. As a consequence $(k-1)$ is a factor of $f(x,y,z,k)$.
Do the same with $k=-1$ which leads to $f(x,y,z,-1)=0$ then a second factor $(k+1)$.
Proceeding on the same manner successively with $x=y$ , $y=z$ , and $z=x$ gives three other factors : $(x-y)$ , $(y-z)$ and $(z-x)$.
Finally
$$f(x,y,z,k)=-2(k-1)(k+1)(x-y)(y-z)(z-x)tag 2$$
The coefficient $-2$ is obtained in giving an arbitrary value to each $x,y,z,k$ , of course so that $fneq 0$ , and comparing the values of Eq.$(1)$ and Eq.$(2)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$ f(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz) tag 1$$
Name the six terms respectively as :
$$f(x,y,z,k)=A*B*C-a*b*c$$
If $k=1$ we have $A=c$ , $B=b$ and $C=b$ thus $ABC=abc$ and $f(x,y,z,1)=0$. As a consequence $(k-1)$ is a factor of $f(x,y,z,k)$.
Do the same with $k=-1$ which leads to $f(x,y,z,-1)=0$ then a second factor $(k+1)$.
Proceeding on the same manner successively with $x=y$ , $y=z$ , and $z=x$ gives three other factors : $(x-y)$ , $(y-z)$ and $(z-x)$.
Finally
$$f(x,y,z,k)=-2(k-1)(k+1)(x-y)(y-z)(z-x)tag 2$$
The coefficient $-2$ is obtained in giving an arbitrary value to each $x,y,z,k$ , of course so that $fneq 0$ , and comparing the values of Eq.$(1)$ and Eq.$(2)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$$ f(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz) tag 1$$
Name the six terms respectively as :
$$f(x,y,z,k)=A*B*C-a*b*c$$
If $k=1$ we have $A=c$ , $B=b$ and $C=b$ thus $ABC=abc$ and $f(x,y,z,1)=0$. As a consequence $(k-1)$ is a factor of $f(x,y,z,k)$.
Do the same with $k=-1$ which leads to $f(x,y,z,-1)=0$ then a second factor $(k+1)$.
Proceeding on the same manner successively with $x=y$ , $y=z$ , and $z=x$ gives three other factors : $(x-y)$ , $(y-z)$ and $(z-x)$.
Finally
$$f(x,y,z,k)=-2(k-1)(k+1)(x-y)(y-z)(z-x)tag 2$$
The coefficient $-2$ is obtained in giving an arbitrary value to each $x,y,z,k$ , of course so that $fneq 0$ , and comparing the values of Eq.$(1)$ and Eq.$(2)$.
$$ f(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz) tag 1$$
Name the six terms respectively as :
$$f(x,y,z,k)=A*B*C-a*b*c$$
If $k=1$ we have $A=c$ , $B=b$ and $C=b$ thus $ABC=abc$ and $f(x,y,z,1)=0$. As a consequence $(k-1)$ is a factor of $f(x,y,z,k)$.
Do the same with $k=-1$ which leads to $f(x,y,z,-1)=0$ then a second factor $(k+1)$.
Proceeding on the same manner successively with $x=y$ , $y=z$ , and $z=x$ gives three other factors : $(x-y)$ , $(y-z)$ and $(z-x)$.
Finally
$$f(x,y,z,k)=-2(k-1)(k+1)(x-y)(y-z)(z-x)tag 2$$
The coefficient $-2$ is obtained in giving an arbitrary value to each $x,y,z,k$ , of course so that $fneq 0$ , and comparing the values of Eq.$(1)$ and Eq.$(2)$.
answered Jul 16 at 18:47
JJacquelin
40.1k21649
40.1k21649
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Let $$P(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz).$$
Prove that $$P(x,x,z,k)=P(x,y,x,k)=P(x,y,y,k)=P(x,y,z,pm 1)=0.$$
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Let $$P(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz).$$
Prove that $$P(x,x,z,k)=P(x,y,x,k)=P(x,y,y,k)=P(x,y,z,pm 1)=0.$$
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Let $$P(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz).$$
Prove that $$P(x,x,z,k)=P(x,y,x,k)=P(x,y,y,k)=P(x,y,z,pm 1)=0.$$
Hint
Let $$P(x,y,z,k)=(kx-y+z)(x+ky-z)(x-y-kz)-(kx+y-z)(x-ky-z)(x-y+kz).$$
Prove that $$P(x,x,z,k)=P(x,y,x,k)=P(x,y,y,k)=P(x,y,z,pm 1)=0.$$
edited Jul 16 at 17:51
answered Jul 16 at 17:27
Leox
5,0921323
5,0921323
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
add a comment |Â
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
This is a nice hint. Do you have any advice on how one would recognize that this is the right way to approach the problem? Are there more computational ways to do it?
â user219923
Jul 16 at 17:58
add a comment |Â