Lemma for Stone-Weierstrass

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












During the proof of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem there is a lemma given:



Lemma: Let $g_1$ and $g_2$ be in $mathcalA$ (an algebra of real-valued continuous functions which strongly separates points in an arbitrary compact metric space $M$). Then for every error $1/m$ there exist functions $g_3$ and $g_4$ in $mathcalA$ such that $|g_3-max(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ and $|g_4-min(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ for all points of $M$.



The proof of the lemma starts of by saying that it suffices to prove the following: if $g$ is in $mathcalA$ then there exists $g_1$ in $mathcalA$ with $|g_1-|g|| le 1/m$. I'm sure this is quite trivial but I can't justify why it's sufficient to prove this statement. Could someone explain why?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    During the proof of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem there is a lemma given:



    Lemma: Let $g_1$ and $g_2$ be in $mathcalA$ (an algebra of real-valued continuous functions which strongly separates points in an arbitrary compact metric space $M$). Then for every error $1/m$ there exist functions $g_3$ and $g_4$ in $mathcalA$ such that $|g_3-max(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ and $|g_4-min(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ for all points of $M$.



    The proof of the lemma starts of by saying that it suffices to prove the following: if $g$ is in $mathcalA$ then there exists $g_1$ in $mathcalA$ with $|g_1-|g|| le 1/m$. I'm sure this is quite trivial but I can't justify why it's sufficient to prove this statement. Could someone explain why?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      During the proof of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem there is a lemma given:



      Lemma: Let $g_1$ and $g_2$ be in $mathcalA$ (an algebra of real-valued continuous functions which strongly separates points in an arbitrary compact metric space $M$). Then for every error $1/m$ there exist functions $g_3$ and $g_4$ in $mathcalA$ such that $|g_3-max(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ and $|g_4-min(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ for all points of $M$.



      The proof of the lemma starts of by saying that it suffices to prove the following: if $g$ is in $mathcalA$ then there exists $g_1$ in $mathcalA$ with $|g_1-|g|| le 1/m$. I'm sure this is quite trivial but I can't justify why it's sufficient to prove this statement. Could someone explain why?







      share|cite|improve this question











      During the proof of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem there is a lemma given:



      Lemma: Let $g_1$ and $g_2$ be in $mathcalA$ (an algebra of real-valued continuous functions which strongly separates points in an arbitrary compact metric space $M$). Then for every error $1/m$ there exist functions $g_3$ and $g_4$ in $mathcalA$ such that $|g_3-max(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ and $|g_4-min(g_1,g_2)| le 1/m$ for all points of $M$.



      The proof of the lemma starts of by saying that it suffices to prove the following: if $g$ is in $mathcalA$ then there exists $g_1$ in $mathcalA$ with $|g_1-|g|| le 1/m$. I'm sure this is quite trivial but I can't justify why it's sufficient to prove this statement. Could someone explain why?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 16 at 15:46









      Twiss013

      11912




      11912




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You have $max(f,g)=frac12(f+g+|f-g|)$ and $min(f,g)=frac12(f+g-|f-g|)$. So if you can approximate $|f-g|$ well, you can approximate $min$ and $max$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
            – Twiss013
            Jul 16 at 16:24










          • It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
            – Kusma
            Jul 16 at 16:36











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853525%2flemma-for-stone-weierstrass%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You have $max(f,g)=frac12(f+g+|f-g|)$ and $min(f,g)=frac12(f+g-|f-g|)$. So if you can approximate $|f-g|$ well, you can approximate $min$ and $max$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
            – Twiss013
            Jul 16 at 16:24










          • It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
            – Kusma
            Jul 16 at 16:36















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You have $max(f,g)=frac12(f+g+|f-g|)$ and $min(f,g)=frac12(f+g-|f-g|)$. So if you can approximate $|f-g|$ well, you can approximate $min$ and $max$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
            – Twiss013
            Jul 16 at 16:24










          • It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
            – Kusma
            Jul 16 at 16:36













          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          You have $max(f,g)=frac12(f+g+|f-g|)$ and $min(f,g)=frac12(f+g-|f-g|)$. So if you can approximate $|f-g|$ well, you can approximate $min$ and $max$.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          You have $max(f,g)=frac12(f+g+|f-g|)$ and $min(f,g)=frac12(f+g-|f-g|)$. So if you can approximate $|f-g|$ well, you can approximate $min$ and $max$.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 16 at 16:07









          Kusma

          1,127112




          1,127112











          • Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
            – Twiss013
            Jul 16 at 16:24










          • It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
            – Kusma
            Jul 16 at 16:36

















          • Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
            – Twiss013
            Jul 16 at 16:24










          • It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
            – Kusma
            Jul 16 at 16:36
















          Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
          – Twiss013
          Jul 16 at 16:24




          Is the absolute value of g unnecessary in the inequality then?
          – Twiss013
          Jul 16 at 16:24












          It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
          – Kusma
          Jul 16 at 16:36





          It is necessary. You start with $h_1,h_2incal A$, then you find $Hin cal A$ such that $|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac1m$, then you have for $min(h_1,h_2)$ that $|frac12(h_1+h_2+H)-min(h_1,h_2)|=frac12|H-|h_1-h_2||<frac12m$ and (as $cal A$ is a vector space) $frac12(h+1+h_2+H)in cal A$.
          – Kusma
          Jul 16 at 16:36













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853525%2flemma-for-stone-weierstrass%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?