Can $Rx$ be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$, if $I:=langle Rsetminus Srangle$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $R$ be any ring and let any set of elements $Ssubset R$ (proper) be such that $0_R,1_Rin S$ with some other elements of $R$. Now, define $$I:=langle Rsetminus Srangle=langleain R: anotin Srangle.$$ That is, $I$ is generated by the set of elements not in $S$.



Question: Is there a possibility some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $R$ be any ring and let any set of elements $Ssubset R$ (proper) be such that $0_R,1_Rin S$ with some other elements of $R$. Now, define $$I:=langle Rsetminus Srangle=langleain R: anotin Srangle.$$ That is, $I$ is generated by the set of elements not in $S$.



    Question: Is there a possibility some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $R$ be any ring and let any set of elements $Ssubset R$ (proper) be such that $0_R,1_Rin S$ with some other elements of $R$. Now, define $$I:=langle Rsetminus Srangle=langleain R: anotin Srangle.$$ That is, $I$ is generated by the set of elements not in $S$.



      Question: Is there a possibility some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?







      share|cite|improve this question











      Let $R$ be any ring and let any set of elements $Ssubset R$ (proper) be such that $0_R,1_Rin S$ with some other elements of $R$. Now, define $$I:=langle Rsetminus Srangle=langleain R: anotin Srangle.$$ That is, $I$ is generated by the set of elements not in $S$.



      Question: Is there a possibility some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 27 at 9:33









      Sulayman

      18717




      18717




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $R=mathbbZ$ and $S=mathbbZsetminus2$. Then $I=2mathbbZ$ and $4in Icap S$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:12










          • @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 12:16










          • Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:34











          • @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 14:40










          • Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:49

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Let $R=mathbbR^3times 3$ and let $S=leftE_i,jmid 1leq i,jleq 3rightcup left0_R,1_Rright$ where $E_i,j$ is the matrix with zeroes everywhere and a $1$ at position $(i,j)$. Then $I=leftlangle Rsetminus Srightrangle=R$. Clearly $RE_1,1$ is contained in $I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:10











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864230%2fcan-rx-be-contained-in-i-for-some-nonzero-x-in-s-if-i-langle-r-setminu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $R=mathbbZ$ and $S=mathbbZsetminus2$. Then $I=2mathbbZ$ and $4in Icap S$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:12










          • @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 12:16










          • Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:34











          • @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 14:40










          • Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:49














          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $R=mathbbZ$ and $S=mathbbZsetminus2$. Then $I=2mathbbZ$ and $4in Icap S$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:12










          • @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 12:16










          • Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:34











          • @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 14:40










          • Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:49












          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Let $R=mathbbZ$ and $S=mathbbZsetminus2$. Then $I=2mathbbZ$ and $4in Icap S$.






          share|cite|improve this answer















          Let $R=mathbbZ$ and $S=mathbbZsetminus2$. Then $I=2mathbbZ$ and $4in Icap S$.







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 27 at 14:40


























          answered Jul 27 at 10:21









          egreg

          164k1180187




          164k1180187











          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:12










          • @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 12:16










          • Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:34











          • @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 14:40










          • Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:49
















          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:12










          • @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 12:16










          • Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:34











          • @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 14:40










          • Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 14:49















          Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 12:12




          Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 12:12












          @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
          – egreg
          Jul 27 at 12:16




          @Sulayman You mean that $I$ is assumed to be proper?
          – egreg
          Jul 27 at 12:16












          Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 14:34





          Yes, at all times, it is assumed that $Isubset R$ as a left ideal
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 14:34













          @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
          – egreg
          Jul 27 at 14:40




          @Sulayman Then it's even easier.
          – egreg
          Jul 27 at 14:40












          Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 14:49




          Thanks, I am waiting for a concrete conclusion on whether there can be any possibility of some left ideal $Rx$ to be contained in $I$ for some nonzero $xin S$?
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 14:49










          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Let $R=mathbbR^3times 3$ and let $S=leftE_i,jmid 1leq i,jleq 3rightcup left0_R,1_Rright$ where $E_i,j$ is the matrix with zeroes everywhere and a $1$ at position $(i,j)$. Then $I=leftlangle Rsetminus Srightrangle=R$. Clearly $RE_1,1$ is contained in $I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:10















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Let $R=mathbbR^3times 3$ and let $S=leftE_i,jmid 1leq i,jleq 3rightcup left0_R,1_Rright$ where $E_i,j$ is the matrix with zeroes everywhere and a $1$ at position $(i,j)$. Then $I=leftlangle Rsetminus Srightrangle=R$. Clearly $RE_1,1$ is contained in $I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:10













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Let $R=mathbbR^3times 3$ and let $S=leftE_i,jmid 1leq i,jleq 3rightcup left0_R,1_Rright$ where $E_i,j$ is the matrix with zeroes everywhere and a $1$ at position $(i,j)$. Then $I=leftlangle Rsetminus Srightrangle=R$. Clearly $RE_1,1$ is contained in $I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Let $R=mathbbR^3times 3$ and let $S=leftE_i,jmid 1leq i,jleq 3rightcup left0_R,1_Rright$ where $E_i,j$ is the matrix with zeroes everywhere and a $1$ at position $(i,j)$. Then $I=leftlangle Rsetminus Srightrangle=R$. Clearly $RE_1,1$ is contained in $I$.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 27 at 10:04









          Mathematician 42

          8,17111437




          8,17111437











          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:10

















          • Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
            – Sulayman
            Jul 27 at 12:10
















          Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 12:10





          Suppose that there is an extra condition on $Rsetminus S$ that the unity can not be in $Rsetminus S$. i.e., $1notinRsetminus S$.
          – Sulayman
          Jul 27 at 12:10













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864230%2fcan-rx-be-contained-in-i-for-some-nonzero-x-in-s-if-i-langle-r-setminu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?