Is $DeclareMathOperatorintintint(Acup B)=int(A)cup int(B)$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have posted a counterexample given in a solution below, but when I attempted the problem I did something different.



My Attempt



Take complements of both sides



$$
int(Acup B)stackrel?=int(A)cup int(B) \
big(int(Acup B)big)^cstackrel?=big(int(A)cup int(B)big)^c \
overline (Acup B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c
$$
I got this step from this answer Prove that the closure of complement, is the complement of the interior
$$overline (A)^ccap (B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c$$



My question



Could I prove from where I stopped that the two sides are not equal? I tried to sketch a ven diagram but both sides seem to give the same intersected set.




Counterexample



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question





















  • From your example, you can get a counterexample to $overlineAcap B=overline Acapoverline B$ too.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 11:48










  • Let $A=(0,1)$ and $B=(1,2)$ thus $overlineAcap B=emptyset$ and $overline Acapoverline B=1$
    – john fowles
    Jul 28 at 12:01















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have posted a counterexample given in a solution below, but when I attempted the problem I did something different.



My Attempt



Take complements of both sides



$$
int(Acup B)stackrel?=int(A)cup int(B) \
big(int(Acup B)big)^cstackrel?=big(int(A)cup int(B)big)^c \
overline (Acup B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c
$$
I got this step from this answer Prove that the closure of complement, is the complement of the interior
$$overline (A)^ccap (B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c$$



My question



Could I prove from where I stopped that the two sides are not equal? I tried to sketch a ven diagram but both sides seem to give the same intersected set.




Counterexample



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question





















  • From your example, you can get a counterexample to $overlineAcap B=overline Acapoverline B$ too.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 11:48










  • Let $A=(0,1)$ and $B=(1,2)$ thus $overlineAcap B=emptyset$ and $overline Acapoverline B=1$
    – john fowles
    Jul 28 at 12:01













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have posted a counterexample given in a solution below, but when I attempted the problem I did something different.



My Attempt



Take complements of both sides



$$
int(Acup B)stackrel?=int(A)cup int(B) \
big(int(Acup B)big)^cstackrel?=big(int(A)cup int(B)big)^c \
overline (Acup B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c
$$
I got this step from this answer Prove that the closure of complement, is the complement of the interior
$$overline (A)^ccap (B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c$$



My question



Could I prove from where I stopped that the two sides are not equal? I tried to sketch a ven diagram but both sides seem to give the same intersected set.




Counterexample



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question













I have posted a counterexample given in a solution below, but when I attempted the problem I did something different.



My Attempt



Take complements of both sides



$$
int(Acup B)stackrel?=int(A)cup int(B) \
big(int(Acup B)big)^cstackrel?=big(int(A)cup int(B)big)^c \
overline (Acup B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c
$$
I got this step from this answer Prove that the closure of complement, is the complement of the interior
$$overline (A)^ccap (B)^cstackrel?=overline(A)^ccap overline(B)^c$$



My question



Could I prove from where I stopped that the two sides are not equal? I tried to sketch a ven diagram but both sides seem to give the same intersected set.




Counterexample



enter image description here









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 28 at 12:23









mvw

30.2k22250




30.2k22250









asked Jul 28 at 11:44









john fowles

1,088817




1,088817











  • From your example, you can get a counterexample to $overlineAcap B=overline Acapoverline B$ too.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 11:48










  • Let $A=(0,1)$ and $B=(1,2)$ thus $overlineAcap B=emptyset$ and $overline Acapoverline B=1$
    – john fowles
    Jul 28 at 12:01

















  • From your example, you can get a counterexample to $overlineAcap B=overline Acapoverline B$ too.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 11:48










  • Let $A=(0,1)$ and $B=(1,2)$ thus $overlineAcap B=emptyset$ and $overline Acapoverline B=1$
    – john fowles
    Jul 28 at 12:01
















From your example, you can get a counterexample to $overlineAcap B=overline Acapoverline B$ too.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 28 at 11:48




From your example, you can get a counterexample to $overlineAcap B=overline Acapoverline B$ too.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 28 at 11:48












Let $A=(0,1)$ and $B=(1,2)$ thus $overlineAcap B=emptyset$ and $overline Acapoverline B=1$
– john fowles
Jul 28 at 12:01





Let $A=(0,1)$ and $B=(1,2)$ thus $overlineAcap B=emptyset$ and $overline Acapoverline B=1$
– john fowles
Jul 28 at 12:01











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Proposition. If the boundaries of A and B are disjoint, then

int A$cup$B = int A $cup$ int B.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    The correct answer to, "does $operatornameint(Acup B)$ equal $operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$?" is:




    Perhaps yes, perhaps no. That depends on which sets $A$ and $B$ are.




    So you have no hope of starting out from nothing and then prove that $operatornameint(Acup B) ne operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$. That conclusion would be as wrong as it is to claim $operatornameint(Acup B) = operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$.



    For a claim (with parameters) that is sometimes true and sometimes false, the best you can do is to prove that it is not always true (and subsequently that it is not always false). You can't hope to do that by doing general manipulations starting from nothing, because that way -- if you do them correctly -- the only thing you will ever reach are things that always have such-and-such truth value.



    Proving something not always true generally takes a concrete counterexample.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865193%2fis-declaremathoperatorintint-inta-cup-b-inta-cup-intb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      Proposition. If the boundaries of A and B are disjoint, then

      int A$cup$B = int A $cup$ int B.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        Proposition. If the boundaries of A and B are disjoint, then

        int A$cup$B = int A $cup$ int B.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          Proposition. If the boundaries of A and B are disjoint, then

          int A$cup$B = int A $cup$ int B.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Proposition. If the boundaries of A and B are disjoint, then

          int A$cup$B = int A $cup$ int B.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 28 at 11:57









          William Elliot

          5,0722414




          5,0722414




















              up vote
              4
              down vote













              The correct answer to, "does $operatornameint(Acup B)$ equal $operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$?" is:




              Perhaps yes, perhaps no. That depends on which sets $A$ and $B$ are.




              So you have no hope of starting out from nothing and then prove that $operatornameint(Acup B) ne operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$. That conclusion would be as wrong as it is to claim $operatornameint(Acup B) = operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$.



              For a claim (with parameters) that is sometimes true and sometimes false, the best you can do is to prove that it is not always true (and subsequently that it is not always false). You can't hope to do that by doing general manipulations starting from nothing, because that way -- if you do them correctly -- the only thing you will ever reach are things that always have such-and-such truth value.



              Proving something not always true generally takes a concrete counterexample.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                The correct answer to, "does $operatornameint(Acup B)$ equal $operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$?" is:




                Perhaps yes, perhaps no. That depends on which sets $A$ and $B$ are.




                So you have no hope of starting out from nothing and then prove that $operatornameint(Acup B) ne operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$. That conclusion would be as wrong as it is to claim $operatornameint(Acup B) = operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$.



                For a claim (with parameters) that is sometimes true and sometimes false, the best you can do is to prove that it is not always true (and subsequently that it is not always false). You can't hope to do that by doing general manipulations starting from nothing, because that way -- if you do them correctly -- the only thing you will ever reach are things that always have such-and-such truth value.



                Proving something not always true generally takes a concrete counterexample.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  The correct answer to, "does $operatornameint(Acup B)$ equal $operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$?" is:




                  Perhaps yes, perhaps no. That depends on which sets $A$ and $B$ are.




                  So you have no hope of starting out from nothing and then prove that $operatornameint(Acup B) ne operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$. That conclusion would be as wrong as it is to claim $operatornameint(Acup B) = operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$.



                  For a claim (with parameters) that is sometimes true and sometimes false, the best you can do is to prove that it is not always true (and subsequently that it is not always false). You can't hope to do that by doing general manipulations starting from nothing, because that way -- if you do them correctly -- the only thing you will ever reach are things that always have such-and-such truth value.



                  Proving something not always true generally takes a concrete counterexample.






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  The correct answer to, "does $operatornameint(Acup B)$ equal $operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$?" is:




                  Perhaps yes, perhaps no. That depends on which sets $A$ and $B$ are.




                  So you have no hope of starting out from nothing and then prove that $operatornameint(Acup B) ne operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$. That conclusion would be as wrong as it is to claim $operatornameint(Acup B) = operatornameint(A)cupoperatornameint(B)$.



                  For a claim (with parameters) that is sometimes true and sometimes false, the best you can do is to prove that it is not always true (and subsequently that it is not always false). You can't hope to do that by doing general manipulations starting from nothing, because that way -- if you do them correctly -- the only thing you will ever reach are things that always have such-and-such truth value.



                  Proving something not always true generally takes a concrete counterexample.







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  answered Jul 28 at 11:59









                  Henning Makholm

                  225k16290516




                  225k16290516






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865193%2fis-declaremathoperatorintint-inta-cup-b-inta-cup-intb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                      Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                      Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?