Symmetry of the Distribution of Sample Mean [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I've studied all the proofs and the theorems. The central limit theorem and the laws of mean and variance, but i still don't grasp intuitively why the distribution of Sample Mean tends to a symmetrical distribution ?
Are you able to help me ?
Thanks
probability statistics
closed as unclear what you're asking by Yves Daoust, Jyrki Lahtonen, Shailesh, Lord Shark the Unknown, Claude Leibovici Jul 29 at 7:05
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, itâÂÂs hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I've studied all the proofs and the theorems. The central limit theorem and the laws of mean and variance, but i still don't grasp intuitively why the distribution of Sample Mean tends to a symmetrical distribution ?
Are you able to help me ?
Thanks
probability statistics
closed as unclear what you're asking by Yves Daoust, Jyrki Lahtonen, Shailesh, Lord Shark the Unknown, Claude Leibovici Jul 29 at 7:05
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, itâÂÂs hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Why is there "symmetry" in the title and not in the body ?
â Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 9:42
Yeah, i edited thanks
â Koinos
Jul 28 at 9:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I've studied all the proofs and the theorems. The central limit theorem and the laws of mean and variance, but i still don't grasp intuitively why the distribution of Sample Mean tends to a symmetrical distribution ?
Are you able to help me ?
Thanks
probability statistics
I've studied all the proofs and the theorems. The central limit theorem and the laws of mean and variance, but i still don't grasp intuitively why the distribution of Sample Mean tends to a symmetrical distribution ?
Are you able to help me ?
Thanks
probability statistics
edited Jul 28 at 9:44
asked Jul 28 at 9:41
Koinos
535
535
closed as unclear what you're asking by Yves Daoust, Jyrki Lahtonen, Shailesh, Lord Shark the Unknown, Claude Leibovici Jul 29 at 7:05
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, itâÂÂs hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Yves Daoust, Jyrki Lahtonen, Shailesh, Lord Shark the Unknown, Claude Leibovici Jul 29 at 7:05
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, itâÂÂs hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Why is there "symmetry" in the title and not in the body ?
â Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 9:42
Yeah, i edited thanks
â Koinos
Jul 28 at 9:44
add a comment |Â
Why is there "symmetry" in the title and not in the body ?
â Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 9:42
Yeah, i edited thanks
â Koinos
Jul 28 at 9:44
Why is there "symmetry" in the title and not in the body ?
â Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 9:42
Why is there "symmetry" in the title and not in the body ?
â Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 9:42
Yeah, i edited thanks
â Koinos
Jul 28 at 9:44
Yeah, i edited thanks
â Koinos
Jul 28 at 9:44
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The pdf of the sum of two random variables is the result of the convolution of the two initial pdf's, which can be seen as a low-pass filtering of the first distribution with the second, mirrored (in other terms, a sliding weighted average). The mirroring comes from the fact that you accumulate for constant sums ($s=x+yimplies y=s-x$).
The result is a smoother and more symmetric function. Smoother because you are averaging with positive-only coefficients, and more symmetric because of the mirroring (high functions values get a lower weight, and conversely).
The limit pdf is a Gaussian because this function enjoys a special property: the result of a Gaussian convolved with a Gaussian is another Gaussian.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The pdf of the sum of two random variables is the result of the convolution of the two initial pdf's, which can be seen as a low-pass filtering of the first distribution with the second, mirrored (in other terms, a sliding weighted average). The mirroring comes from the fact that you accumulate for constant sums ($s=x+yimplies y=s-x$).
The result is a smoother and more symmetric function. Smoother because you are averaging with positive-only coefficients, and more symmetric because of the mirroring (high functions values get a lower weight, and conversely).
The limit pdf is a Gaussian because this function enjoys a special property: the result of a Gaussian convolved with a Gaussian is another Gaussian.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
The pdf of the sum of two random variables is the result of the convolution of the two initial pdf's, which can be seen as a low-pass filtering of the first distribution with the second, mirrored (in other terms, a sliding weighted average). The mirroring comes from the fact that you accumulate for constant sums ($s=x+yimplies y=s-x$).
The result is a smoother and more symmetric function. Smoother because you are averaging with positive-only coefficients, and more symmetric because of the mirroring (high functions values get a lower weight, and conversely).
The limit pdf is a Gaussian because this function enjoys a special property: the result of a Gaussian convolved with a Gaussian is another Gaussian.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The pdf of the sum of two random variables is the result of the convolution of the two initial pdf's, which can be seen as a low-pass filtering of the first distribution with the second, mirrored (in other terms, a sliding weighted average). The mirroring comes from the fact that you accumulate for constant sums ($s=x+yimplies y=s-x$).
The result is a smoother and more symmetric function. Smoother because you are averaging with positive-only coefficients, and more symmetric because of the mirroring (high functions values get a lower weight, and conversely).
The limit pdf is a Gaussian because this function enjoys a special property: the result of a Gaussian convolved with a Gaussian is another Gaussian.
The pdf of the sum of two random variables is the result of the convolution of the two initial pdf's, which can be seen as a low-pass filtering of the first distribution with the second, mirrored (in other terms, a sliding weighted average). The mirroring comes from the fact that you accumulate for constant sums ($s=x+yimplies y=s-x$).
The result is a smoother and more symmetric function. Smoother because you are averaging with positive-only coefficients, and more symmetric because of the mirroring (high functions values get a lower weight, and conversely).
The limit pdf is a Gaussian because this function enjoys a special property: the result of a Gaussian convolved with a Gaussian is another Gaussian.
answered Jul 28 at 9:56
Yves Daoust
110k665203
110k665203
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Why is there "symmetry" in the title and not in the body ?
â Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 9:42
Yeah, i edited thanks
â Koinos
Jul 28 at 9:44