What does this Cantor space in $left[frac13,1right]$ look like?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












What does this Cantor space in $left[frac13,1right]$ look like? Does it look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $xinBbb Z[frac16]:lvert xrvert_2geq1}$ by $lvertcdotrvert_4$?




I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$




By the usual bijection to the unit interval it seems obvious it will be in the subset $left[frac13,1right]$ because the smallest number is $.overline1_4$ and the largest $.overline3_4$



It can be written $displaystylesum_n=0^infty fraca_n4^n+1$ with $a_nin1,3$



Or it could equally be written:



$displaystylesum_n=0^infty frac2a_n+14^n+1$ with $a_nin0,1$




I'm struggling to visualise whether the usual removing a centre third structure is preserved or whether it's something degenerate. My instinct says its construction follows the usual diagram of the Cantor set with the centre third removed rather than a half or quarter, but perhaps with the left hand edge tapering in towards the bottom-right at each step.



Or perhaps it's just $frac23cdot C+frac13$




A bit of a random shot in the dark but does this look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $Bbb Z[frac16]$ by a "4-adic" valuation $lvertcdotrvert_4$? (please note I'm aware $C$ is an uncountable set including limit points).







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    You start your question by saying "this Cantor space", but there's nothing for the word "this" to point back to. Which Cantor space are you talking about?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:09










  • @HenningMakholm sorry "I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$" I've given it more prominence now, it was a bit lost.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:10











  • Why are you only defining what you're talking about halfway down the question, instead of before you begin to ask questions about it?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:11






  • 1




    @HenningMakholm because I'm an idiot
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:11










  • @HenningMakholm ...it's starting to look like it's $[frac13,1]$ with the centre half progressively removed.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:12















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












What does this Cantor space in $left[frac13,1right]$ look like? Does it look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $xinBbb Z[frac16]:lvert xrvert_2geq1}$ by $lvertcdotrvert_4$?




I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$




By the usual bijection to the unit interval it seems obvious it will be in the subset $left[frac13,1right]$ because the smallest number is $.overline1_4$ and the largest $.overline3_4$



It can be written $displaystylesum_n=0^infty fraca_n4^n+1$ with $a_nin1,3$



Or it could equally be written:



$displaystylesum_n=0^infty frac2a_n+14^n+1$ with $a_nin0,1$




I'm struggling to visualise whether the usual removing a centre third structure is preserved or whether it's something degenerate. My instinct says its construction follows the usual diagram of the Cantor set with the centre third removed rather than a half or quarter, but perhaps with the left hand edge tapering in towards the bottom-right at each step.



Or perhaps it's just $frac23cdot C+frac13$




A bit of a random shot in the dark but does this look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $Bbb Z[frac16]$ by a "4-adic" valuation $lvertcdotrvert_4$? (please note I'm aware $C$ is an uncountable set including limit points).







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    You start your question by saying "this Cantor space", but there's nothing for the word "this" to point back to. Which Cantor space are you talking about?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:09










  • @HenningMakholm sorry "I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$" I've given it more prominence now, it was a bit lost.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:10











  • Why are you only defining what you're talking about halfway down the question, instead of before you begin to ask questions about it?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:11






  • 1




    @HenningMakholm because I'm an idiot
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:11










  • @HenningMakholm ...it's starting to look like it's $[frac13,1]$ with the centre half progressively removed.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:12













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











What does this Cantor space in $left[frac13,1right]$ look like? Does it look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $xinBbb Z[frac16]:lvert xrvert_2geq1}$ by $lvertcdotrvert_4$?




I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$




By the usual bijection to the unit interval it seems obvious it will be in the subset $left[frac13,1right]$ because the smallest number is $.overline1_4$ and the largest $.overline3_4$



It can be written $displaystylesum_n=0^infty fraca_n4^n+1$ with $a_nin1,3$



Or it could equally be written:



$displaystylesum_n=0^infty frac2a_n+14^n+1$ with $a_nin0,1$




I'm struggling to visualise whether the usual removing a centre third structure is preserved or whether it's something degenerate. My instinct says its construction follows the usual diagram of the Cantor set with the centre third removed rather than a half or quarter, but perhaps with the left hand edge tapering in towards the bottom-right at each step.



Or perhaps it's just $frac23cdot C+frac13$




A bit of a random shot in the dark but does this look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $Bbb Z[frac16]$ by a "4-adic" valuation $lvertcdotrvert_4$? (please note I'm aware $C$ is an uncountable set including limit points).







share|cite|improve this question













What does this Cantor space in $left[frac13,1right]$ look like? Does it look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $xinBbb Z[frac16]:lvert xrvert_2geq1}$ by $lvertcdotrvert_4$?




I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$




By the usual bijection to the unit interval it seems obvious it will be in the subset $left[frac13,1right]$ because the smallest number is $.overline1_4$ and the largest $.overline3_4$



It can be written $displaystylesum_n=0^infty fraca_n4^n+1$ with $a_nin1,3$



Or it could equally be written:



$displaystylesum_n=0^infty frac2a_n+14^n+1$ with $a_nin0,1$




I'm struggling to visualise whether the usual removing a centre third structure is preserved or whether it's something degenerate. My instinct says its construction follows the usual diagram of the Cantor set with the centre third removed rather than a half or quarter, but perhaps with the left hand edge tapering in towards the bottom-right at each step.



Or perhaps it's just $frac23cdot C+frac13$




A bit of a random shot in the dark but does this look anything like $xinBbb Z[frac16]cap[frac13,1]:lvert xrvert_2geq1$ and if so, does it imply some p-adic type completion of $Bbb Z[frac16]$ by a "4-adic" valuation $lvertcdotrvert_4$? (please note I'm aware $C$ is an uncountable set including limit points).









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 28 at 11:10
























asked Jul 28 at 9:20









Robert Frost

3,884936




3,884936







  • 1




    You start your question by saying "this Cantor space", but there's nothing for the word "this" to point back to. Which Cantor space are you talking about?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:09










  • @HenningMakholm sorry "I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$" I've given it more prominence now, it was a bit lost.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:10











  • Why are you only defining what you're talking about halfway down the question, instead of before you begin to ask questions about it?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:11






  • 1




    @HenningMakholm because I'm an idiot
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:11










  • @HenningMakholm ...it's starting to look like it's $[frac13,1]$ with the centre half progressively removed.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:12













  • 1




    You start your question by saying "this Cantor space", but there's nothing for the word "this" to point back to. Which Cantor space are you talking about?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:09










  • @HenningMakholm sorry "I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$" I've given it more prominence now, it was a bit lost.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:10











  • Why are you only defining what you're talking about halfway down the question, instead of before you begin to ask questions about it?
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 28 at 11:11






  • 1




    @HenningMakholm because I'm an idiot
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:11










  • @HenningMakholm ...it's starting to look like it's $[frac13,1]$ with the centre half progressively removed.
    – Robert Frost
    Jul 28 at 11:12








1




1




You start your question by saying "this Cantor space", but there's nothing for the word "this" to point back to. Which Cantor space are you talking about?
– Henning Makholm
Jul 28 at 11:09




You start your question by saying "this Cantor space", but there's nothing for the word "this" to point back to. Which Cantor space are you talking about?
– Henning Makholm
Jul 28 at 11:09












@HenningMakholm sorry "I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$" I've given it more prominence now, it was a bit lost.
– Robert Frost
Jul 28 at 11:10





@HenningMakholm sorry "I'm looking at the numbers expressible in base $4$ using only the digits drawn from $1,3$" I've given it more prominence now, it was a bit lost.
– Robert Frost
Jul 28 at 11:10













Why are you only defining what you're talking about halfway down the question, instead of before you begin to ask questions about it?
– Henning Makholm
Jul 28 at 11:11




Why are you only defining what you're talking about halfway down the question, instead of before you begin to ask questions about it?
– Henning Makholm
Jul 28 at 11:11




1




1




@HenningMakholm because I'm an idiot
– Robert Frost
Jul 28 at 11:11




@HenningMakholm because I'm an idiot
– Robert Frost
Jul 28 at 11:11












@HenningMakholm ...it's starting to look like it's $[frac13,1]$ with the centre half progressively removed.
– Robert Frost
Jul 28 at 11:12





@HenningMakholm ...it's starting to look like it's $[frac13,1]$ with the centre half progressively removed.
– Robert Frost
Jul 28 at 11:12











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your construction is closely analogous to the usual middle-thirds Cantor set, except at each step you remove the middle half, leaving a fourth at each end.



To wit, if you take your set, scale it by $frac14$ and add either $frac 14$ or $frac34$, you get the two self-similar components of the set.



The inner endpoints of those components are $0.1333ldots_4=0.2_4=frac 12$ and $0.3111ldots_4 = frac56$, so each has length $frac16$ and there is $frac26$ of removed interval between them.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865127%2fwhat-does-this-cantor-space-in-left-frac13-1-right-look-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Your construction is closely analogous to the usual middle-thirds Cantor set, except at each step you remove the middle half, leaving a fourth at each end.



    To wit, if you take your set, scale it by $frac14$ and add either $frac 14$ or $frac34$, you get the two self-similar components of the set.



    The inner endpoints of those components are $0.1333ldots_4=0.2_4=frac 12$ and $0.3111ldots_4 = frac56$, so each has length $frac16$ and there is $frac26$ of removed interval between them.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Your construction is closely analogous to the usual middle-thirds Cantor set, except at each step you remove the middle half, leaving a fourth at each end.



      To wit, if you take your set, scale it by $frac14$ and add either $frac 14$ or $frac34$, you get the two self-similar components of the set.



      The inner endpoints of those components are $0.1333ldots_4=0.2_4=frac 12$ and $0.3111ldots_4 = frac56$, so each has length $frac16$ and there is $frac26$ of removed interval between them.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Your construction is closely analogous to the usual middle-thirds Cantor set, except at each step you remove the middle half, leaving a fourth at each end.



        To wit, if you take your set, scale it by $frac14$ and add either $frac 14$ or $frac34$, you get the two self-similar components of the set.



        The inner endpoints of those components are $0.1333ldots_4=0.2_4=frac 12$ and $0.3111ldots_4 = frac56$, so each has length $frac16$ and there is $frac26$ of removed interval between them.






        share|cite|improve this answer















        Your construction is closely analogous to the usual middle-thirds Cantor set, except at each step you remove the middle half, leaving a fourth at each end.



        To wit, if you take your set, scale it by $frac14$ and add either $frac 14$ or $frac34$, you get the two self-similar components of the set.



        The inner endpoints of those components are $0.1333ldots_4=0.2_4=frac 12$ and $0.3111ldots_4 = frac56$, so each has length $frac16$ and there is $frac26$ of removed interval between them.







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 28 at 14:21


























        answered Jul 28 at 11:20









        Henning Makholm

        225k16290516




        225k16290516






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865127%2fwhat-does-this-cantor-space-in-left-frac13-1-right-look-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon