Real eigenvalues of a matrix over a field of Complex Numbers

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to solve a question (exam prep) which asks for Real eigenvalues of a matrix. My problem is that the Matrix is given over a field of Complex numbers (as shown on the picture) Matrix



Is there a special method for finding eigenvalues for matrices over a field of complex numbers? or can i use the normal method of finding Det(Matrix - IX)v =0 roots. If i use the normal method i get eigenvalue of -1.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    That's actually a real matrix. Also please see math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020 for tips on how to write maths, including matrices.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:28














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to solve a question (exam prep) which asks for Real eigenvalues of a matrix. My problem is that the Matrix is given over a field of Complex numbers (as shown on the picture) Matrix



Is there a special method for finding eigenvalues for matrices over a field of complex numbers? or can i use the normal method of finding Det(Matrix - IX)v =0 roots. If i use the normal method i get eigenvalue of -1.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    That's actually a real matrix. Also please see math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020 for tips on how to write maths, including matrices.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:28












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to solve a question (exam prep) which asks for Real eigenvalues of a matrix. My problem is that the Matrix is given over a field of Complex numbers (as shown on the picture) Matrix



Is there a special method for finding eigenvalues for matrices over a field of complex numbers? or can i use the normal method of finding Det(Matrix - IX)v =0 roots. If i use the normal method i get eigenvalue of -1.







share|cite|improve this question











I'm trying to solve a question (exam prep) which asks for Real eigenvalues of a matrix. My problem is that the Matrix is given over a field of Complex numbers (as shown on the picture) Matrix



Is there a special method for finding eigenvalues for matrices over a field of complex numbers? or can i use the normal method of finding Det(Matrix - IX)v =0 roots. If i use the normal method i get eigenvalue of -1.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 28 at 15:24









Asi Orasi

32




32







  • 1




    That's actually a real matrix. Also please see math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020 for tips on how to write maths, including matrices.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:28












  • 1




    That's actually a real matrix. Also please see math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020 for tips on how to write maths, including matrices.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:28







1




1




That's actually a real matrix. Also please see math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020 for tips on how to write maths, including matrices.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 28 at 15:28




That's actually a real matrix. Also please see math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020 for tips on how to write maths, including matrices.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 28 at 15:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The only why of finding eigenvalues is solving the characteristic polynomial, doesn't matter over what field your matrices are, they can be over anything. In your case is even easier because the matrix is effectively a real matrix, the fact that is over the complex field means that even if you have some complex eigenvalues you can still diagonalise the matrix. In anyway, you find the eigenvalues by the roots of the characteristic polynomial $$det(A-lambdamathbbI)=0$$ The problem asks you to take only the eigenvalues s.t. $lambdainmathbbR$, so in this case, being the characteristic polynomial as follows $$-(lambda+1)(lambda^2+1)=0implieslambda_1 =-1;;lambda_2=i;;lambda_3=-i$$
the answer to your problem is $lambda_1=-1$.



One way for a complex matrix to have all real eigenvalues is if the matrix is hermitian for the spectral theorem. See as a simple example the Puli matrices. But it's not the only way. As pointed out by user Lord Shark the Unknown even the matrix $$left(beginmatrix1&i\0&-1endmatrixright)$$ has two real eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:51










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
    – Davide Morgante
    Jul 28 at 15:52











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865331%2freal-eigenvalues-of-a-matrix-over-a-field-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The only why of finding eigenvalues is solving the characteristic polynomial, doesn't matter over what field your matrices are, they can be over anything. In your case is even easier because the matrix is effectively a real matrix, the fact that is over the complex field means that even if you have some complex eigenvalues you can still diagonalise the matrix. In anyway, you find the eigenvalues by the roots of the characteristic polynomial $$det(A-lambdamathbbI)=0$$ The problem asks you to take only the eigenvalues s.t. $lambdainmathbbR$, so in this case, being the characteristic polynomial as follows $$-(lambda+1)(lambda^2+1)=0implieslambda_1 =-1;;lambda_2=i;;lambda_3=-i$$
the answer to your problem is $lambda_1=-1$.



One way for a complex matrix to have all real eigenvalues is if the matrix is hermitian for the spectral theorem. See as a simple example the Puli matrices. But it's not the only way. As pointed out by user Lord Shark the Unknown even the matrix $$left(beginmatrix1&i\0&-1endmatrixright)$$ has two real eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:51










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
    – Davide Morgante
    Jul 28 at 15:52















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The only why of finding eigenvalues is solving the characteristic polynomial, doesn't matter over what field your matrices are, they can be over anything. In your case is even easier because the matrix is effectively a real matrix, the fact that is over the complex field means that even if you have some complex eigenvalues you can still diagonalise the matrix. In anyway, you find the eigenvalues by the roots of the characteristic polynomial $$det(A-lambdamathbbI)=0$$ The problem asks you to take only the eigenvalues s.t. $lambdainmathbbR$, so in this case, being the characteristic polynomial as follows $$-(lambda+1)(lambda^2+1)=0implieslambda_1 =-1;;lambda_2=i;;lambda_3=-i$$
the answer to your problem is $lambda_1=-1$.



One way for a complex matrix to have all real eigenvalues is if the matrix is hermitian for the spectral theorem. See as a simple example the Puli matrices. But it's not the only way. As pointed out by user Lord Shark the Unknown even the matrix $$left(beginmatrix1&i\0&-1endmatrixright)$$ has two real eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:51










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
    – Davide Morgante
    Jul 28 at 15:52













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






The only why of finding eigenvalues is solving the characteristic polynomial, doesn't matter over what field your matrices are, they can be over anything. In your case is even easier because the matrix is effectively a real matrix, the fact that is over the complex field means that even if you have some complex eigenvalues you can still diagonalise the matrix. In anyway, you find the eigenvalues by the roots of the characteristic polynomial $$det(A-lambdamathbbI)=0$$ The problem asks you to take only the eigenvalues s.t. $lambdainmathbbR$, so in this case, being the characteristic polynomial as follows $$-(lambda+1)(lambda^2+1)=0implieslambda_1 =-1;;lambda_2=i;;lambda_3=-i$$
the answer to your problem is $lambda_1=-1$.



One way for a complex matrix to have all real eigenvalues is if the matrix is hermitian for the spectral theorem. See as a simple example the Puli matrices. But it's not the only way. As pointed out by user Lord Shark the Unknown even the matrix $$left(beginmatrix1&i\0&-1endmatrixright)$$ has two real eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer















The only why of finding eigenvalues is solving the characteristic polynomial, doesn't matter over what field your matrices are, they can be over anything. In your case is even easier because the matrix is effectively a real matrix, the fact that is over the complex field means that even if you have some complex eigenvalues you can still diagonalise the matrix. In anyway, you find the eigenvalues by the roots of the characteristic polynomial $$det(A-lambdamathbbI)=0$$ The problem asks you to take only the eigenvalues s.t. $lambdainmathbbR$, so in this case, being the characteristic polynomial as follows $$-(lambda+1)(lambda^2+1)=0implieslambda_1 =-1;;lambda_2=i;;lambda_3=-i$$
the answer to your problem is $lambda_1=-1$.



One way for a complex matrix to have all real eigenvalues is if the matrix is hermitian for the spectral theorem. See as a simple example the Puli matrices. But it's not the only way. As pointed out by user Lord Shark the Unknown even the matrix $$left(beginmatrix1&i\0&-1endmatrixright)$$ has two real eigenvalues.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 28 at 15:56


























answered Jul 28 at 15:32









Davide Morgante

1,724220




1,724220











  • Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:51










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
    – Davide Morgante
    Jul 28 at 15:52

















  • Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 28 at 15:51










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
    – Davide Morgante
    Jul 28 at 15:52
















Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 28 at 15:51




Complex matrices may have real eigenvalues without being Hermitian: How about $pmatrix1&i\0&-1$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 28 at 15:51












@LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
– Davide Morgante
Jul 28 at 15:52





@LordSharktheUnknown Yes, that's true! I shouldn't say "the only way" but instead "one way", thanks for letting me know
– Davide Morgante
Jul 28 at 15:52













 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865331%2freal-eigenvalues-of-a-matrix-over-a-field-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?