Find the largest power of 3 that divides $N =19202122…919293$. [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Question



All the numbers from $19$ to $93$ are written consecutively to form the number $N =19202122...........919293$. Find the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.



The following hint has been provided.



The square of any integer is either divisible by $4$ or leaves a remainder $1$ divided by $4$. Thus, an integer which leaves a remainder $2$ or $3$ when divided by $4$ can never be a square. If a prime p divides a square number the $p^2$ also divides that number.







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister Jul 29 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    What is your attempt?
    – Mythomorphic
    Jul 28 at 12:43






  • 1




    1 st power of 3 only
    – Ninja hatori
    Jul 28 at 13:00














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Question



All the numbers from $19$ to $93$ are written consecutively to form the number $N =19202122...........919293$. Find the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.



The following hint has been provided.



The square of any integer is either divisible by $4$ or leaves a remainder $1$ divided by $4$. Thus, an integer which leaves a remainder $2$ or $3$ when divided by $4$ can never be a square. If a prime p divides a square number the $p^2$ also divides that number.







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister Jul 29 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    What is your attempt?
    – Mythomorphic
    Jul 28 at 12:43






  • 1




    1 st power of 3 only
    – Ninja hatori
    Jul 28 at 13:00












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Question



All the numbers from $19$ to $93$ are written consecutively to form the number $N =19202122...........919293$. Find the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.



The following hint has been provided.



The square of any integer is either divisible by $4$ or leaves a remainder $1$ divided by $4$. Thus, an integer which leaves a remainder $2$ or $3$ when divided by $4$ can never be a square. If a prime p divides a square number the $p^2$ also divides that number.







share|cite|improve this question













Question



All the numbers from $19$ to $93$ are written consecutively to form the number $N =19202122...........919293$. Find the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.



The following hint has been provided.



The square of any integer is either divisible by $4$ or leaves a remainder $1$ divided by $4$. Thus, an integer which leaves a remainder $2$ or $3$ when divided by $4$ can never be a square. If a prime p divides a square number the $p^2$ also divides that number.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 28 at 12:44









Mythomorphic

5,0811732




5,0811732









asked Jul 28 at 12:41









Whosethat

6




6




closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister Jul 29 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister Jul 29 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Jyrki Lahtonen, Xander Henderson, José Carlos Santos, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 1




    What is your attempt?
    – Mythomorphic
    Jul 28 at 12:43






  • 1




    1 st power of 3 only
    – Ninja hatori
    Jul 28 at 13:00












  • 1




    What is your attempt?
    – Mythomorphic
    Jul 28 at 12:43






  • 1




    1 st power of 3 only
    – Ninja hatori
    Jul 28 at 13:00







1




1




What is your attempt?
– Mythomorphic
Jul 28 at 12:43




What is your attempt?
– Mythomorphic
Jul 28 at 12:43




1




1




1 st power of 3 only
– Ninja hatori
Jul 28 at 13:00




1 st power of 3 only
– Ninja hatori
Jul 28 at 13:00










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













With a bit more rigour and without a calculator, we have:



$$N =sum_k=0^93-19 (93-k)cdot 10^2k$$



Now if we inspect this $bmod 9$ we can use the fact that $10^j equiv 1 mod 9$ to find:



$$N equivsum_k=0^74 (93-k) mod 9$$
$$N equiv 75cdot 93 - sum_k=0^74 k mod 9$$
$$N equiv 3cdot 3 - frac12cdot 74cdot 75 mod 9$$
$$N equiv 9 - 37cdot 3 mod 9$$
$$N equiv 9 - 1cdot 3 mod 9$$
$$N equiv 6 mod 9$$



Thus we know that $N$ is not divisible by $9$. But since $(N bmod 9) equiv N mod 3$ we can re-use the above calculation to immediately find that $N equiv 0 mod 3$ and thus is divisible by $3$. That is the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    First of all calculate sum of digits that sum of natural numbers from 19 to 93 which is 4200. It is divisible by 3 but not 9. For divisibility of higher power it has to be divisible by 9 but it is not divisible by 9. So higher power should be 1.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
      – rsadhvika
      Jul 28 at 13:26










    • @rsadhvika hint might help.
      – Ninja hatori
      Jul 28 at 13:41

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    With a bit more rigour and without a calculator, we have:



    $$N =sum_k=0^93-19 (93-k)cdot 10^2k$$



    Now if we inspect this $bmod 9$ we can use the fact that $10^j equiv 1 mod 9$ to find:



    $$N equivsum_k=0^74 (93-k) mod 9$$
    $$N equiv 75cdot 93 - sum_k=0^74 k mod 9$$
    $$N equiv 3cdot 3 - frac12cdot 74cdot 75 mod 9$$
    $$N equiv 9 - 37cdot 3 mod 9$$
    $$N equiv 9 - 1cdot 3 mod 9$$
    $$N equiv 6 mod 9$$



    Thus we know that $N$ is not divisible by $9$. But since $(N bmod 9) equiv N mod 3$ we can re-use the above calculation to immediately find that $N equiv 0 mod 3$ and thus is divisible by $3$. That is the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      With a bit more rigour and without a calculator, we have:



      $$N =sum_k=0^93-19 (93-k)cdot 10^2k$$



      Now if we inspect this $bmod 9$ we can use the fact that $10^j equiv 1 mod 9$ to find:



      $$N equivsum_k=0^74 (93-k) mod 9$$
      $$N equiv 75cdot 93 - sum_k=0^74 k mod 9$$
      $$N equiv 3cdot 3 - frac12cdot 74cdot 75 mod 9$$
      $$N equiv 9 - 37cdot 3 mod 9$$
      $$N equiv 9 - 1cdot 3 mod 9$$
      $$N equiv 6 mod 9$$



      Thus we know that $N$ is not divisible by $9$. But since $(N bmod 9) equiv N mod 3$ we can re-use the above calculation to immediately find that $N equiv 0 mod 3$ and thus is divisible by $3$. That is the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        With a bit more rigour and without a calculator, we have:



        $$N =sum_k=0^93-19 (93-k)cdot 10^2k$$



        Now if we inspect this $bmod 9$ we can use the fact that $10^j equiv 1 mod 9$ to find:



        $$N equivsum_k=0^74 (93-k) mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 75cdot 93 - sum_k=0^74 k mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 3cdot 3 - frac12cdot 74cdot 75 mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 9 - 37cdot 3 mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 9 - 1cdot 3 mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 6 mod 9$$



        Thus we know that $N$ is not divisible by $9$. But since $(N bmod 9) equiv N mod 3$ we can re-use the above calculation to immediately find that $N equiv 0 mod 3$ and thus is divisible by $3$. That is the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        With a bit more rigour and without a calculator, we have:



        $$N =sum_k=0^93-19 (93-k)cdot 10^2k$$



        Now if we inspect this $bmod 9$ we can use the fact that $10^j equiv 1 mod 9$ to find:



        $$N equivsum_k=0^74 (93-k) mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 75cdot 93 - sum_k=0^74 k mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 3cdot 3 - frac12cdot 74cdot 75 mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 9 - 37cdot 3 mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 9 - 1cdot 3 mod 9$$
        $$N equiv 6 mod 9$$



        Thus we know that $N$ is not divisible by $9$. But since $(N bmod 9) equiv N mod 3$ we can re-use the above calculation to immediately find that $N equiv 0 mod 3$ and thus is divisible by $3$. That is the largest power of $3$ that divides $N$.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 28 at 13:30









        orlp

        6,5951228




        6,5951228




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            First of all calculate sum of digits that sum of natural numbers from 19 to 93 which is 4200. It is divisible by 3 but not 9. For divisibility of higher power it has to be divisible by 9 but it is not divisible by 9. So higher power should be 1.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
              – rsadhvika
              Jul 28 at 13:26










            • @rsadhvika hint might help.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 28 at 13:41














            up vote
            1
            down vote













            First of all calculate sum of digits that sum of natural numbers from 19 to 93 which is 4200. It is divisible by 3 but not 9. For divisibility of higher power it has to be divisible by 9 but it is not divisible by 9. So higher power should be 1.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
              – rsadhvika
              Jul 28 at 13:26










            • @rsadhvika hint might help.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 28 at 13:41












            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            First of all calculate sum of digits that sum of natural numbers from 19 to 93 which is 4200. It is divisible by 3 but not 9. For divisibility of higher power it has to be divisible by 9 but it is not divisible by 9. So higher power should be 1.






            share|cite|improve this answer













            First of all calculate sum of digits that sum of natural numbers from 19 to 93 which is 4200. It is divisible by 3 but not 9. For divisibility of higher power it has to be divisible by 9 but it is not divisible by 9. So higher power should be 1.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Jul 28 at 13:07









            Ninja hatori

            105113




            105113











            • Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
              – rsadhvika
              Jul 28 at 13:26










            • @rsadhvika hint might help.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 28 at 13:41
















            • Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
              – rsadhvika
              Jul 28 at 13:26










            • @rsadhvika hint might help.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 28 at 13:41















            Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
            – rsadhvika
            Jul 28 at 13:26




            Brilliant! Wonder how it could be done if the sum were divisible by $9$
            – rsadhvika
            Jul 28 at 13:26












            @rsadhvika hint might help.
            – Ninja hatori
            Jul 28 at 13:41




            @rsadhvika hint might help.
            – Ninja hatori
            Jul 28 at 13:41


            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?