Index of subgroup of Real number in Complex Number
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Complex Number is group under addition. Real Number is its subgroup. It is the trivially normal subgroup. I wanted to find its index.
I thought one 2 dimension plane with X axis and Y axis. Its coset can be given in form like $(0,a)+(R,0)$ Where $a$ is any real Number.
This then says that is index is same as the cardinality of R.
Is I am right?
abstract-algebra group-theory normal-subgroups
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Complex Number is group under addition. Real Number is its subgroup. It is the trivially normal subgroup. I wanted to find its index.
I thought one 2 dimension plane with X axis and Y axis. Its coset can be given in form like $(0,a)+(R,0)$ Where $a$ is any real Number.
This then says that is index is same as the cardinality of R.
Is I am right?
abstract-algebra group-theory normal-subgroups
Exactly right. . .
â Lubin
Jul 28 at 12:28
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Complex Number is group under addition. Real Number is its subgroup. It is the trivially normal subgroup. I wanted to find its index.
I thought one 2 dimension plane with X axis and Y axis. Its coset can be given in form like $(0,a)+(R,0)$ Where $a$ is any real Number.
This then says that is index is same as the cardinality of R.
Is I am right?
abstract-algebra group-theory normal-subgroups
Complex Number is group under addition. Real Number is its subgroup. It is the trivially normal subgroup. I wanted to find its index.
I thought one 2 dimension plane with X axis and Y axis. Its coset can be given in form like $(0,a)+(R,0)$ Where $a$ is any real Number.
This then says that is index is same as the cardinality of R.
Is I am right?
abstract-algebra group-theory normal-subgroups
asked Jul 28 at 12:19
SRJ
1,041317
1,041317
Exactly right. . .
â Lubin
Jul 28 at 12:28
add a comment |Â
Exactly right. . .
â Lubin
Jul 28 at 12:28
Exactly right. . .
â Lubin
Jul 28 at 12:28
Exactly right. . .
â Lubin
Jul 28 at 12:28
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You are right, the index is $|Bbb R|$ because that's how many cosets $Bbb R$ has in $Bbb C$. Geometrically, each coset is a horizontal line in the complex plane, and each horizontal line is a coset. Your argument is an exact algebraic analogue of that.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Another way to see this: as abelian additive groups $mathbbC=mathbbR oplus mathbbR$. Here $mathbbR cong (r,0): r in mathbbR$. Now define a map $mathbbC rightarrow mathbbR$, by $z mapsto Im(z)$. This is a surjective homomorphism, with kernel $mathbbR$. Hence $mathbbC/mathbbR cong mathbbR$ as additive groups.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You are right, the index is $|Bbb R|$ because that's how many cosets $Bbb R$ has in $Bbb C$. Geometrically, each coset is a horizontal line in the complex plane, and each horizontal line is a coset. Your argument is an exact algebraic analogue of that.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You are right, the index is $|Bbb R|$ because that's how many cosets $Bbb R$ has in $Bbb C$. Geometrically, each coset is a horizontal line in the complex plane, and each horizontal line is a coset. Your argument is an exact algebraic analogue of that.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You are right, the index is $|Bbb R|$ because that's how many cosets $Bbb R$ has in $Bbb C$. Geometrically, each coset is a horizontal line in the complex plane, and each horizontal line is a coset. Your argument is an exact algebraic analogue of that.
You are right, the index is $|Bbb R|$ because that's how many cosets $Bbb R$ has in $Bbb C$. Geometrically, each coset is a horizontal line in the complex plane, and each horizontal line is a coset. Your argument is an exact algebraic analogue of that.
answered Jul 28 at 13:02
Arthur
98.4k793174
98.4k793174
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Another way to see this: as abelian additive groups $mathbbC=mathbbR oplus mathbbR$. Here $mathbbR cong (r,0): r in mathbbR$. Now define a map $mathbbC rightarrow mathbbR$, by $z mapsto Im(z)$. This is a surjective homomorphism, with kernel $mathbbR$. Hence $mathbbC/mathbbR cong mathbbR$ as additive groups.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Another way to see this: as abelian additive groups $mathbbC=mathbbR oplus mathbbR$. Here $mathbbR cong (r,0): r in mathbbR$. Now define a map $mathbbC rightarrow mathbbR$, by $z mapsto Im(z)$. This is a surjective homomorphism, with kernel $mathbbR$. Hence $mathbbC/mathbbR cong mathbbR$ as additive groups.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Another way to see this: as abelian additive groups $mathbbC=mathbbR oplus mathbbR$. Here $mathbbR cong (r,0): r in mathbbR$. Now define a map $mathbbC rightarrow mathbbR$, by $z mapsto Im(z)$. This is a surjective homomorphism, with kernel $mathbbR$. Hence $mathbbC/mathbbR cong mathbbR$ as additive groups.
Another way to see this: as abelian additive groups $mathbbC=mathbbR oplus mathbbR$. Here $mathbbR cong (r,0): r in mathbbR$. Now define a map $mathbbC rightarrow mathbbR$, by $z mapsto Im(z)$. This is a surjective homomorphism, with kernel $mathbbR$. Hence $mathbbC/mathbbR cong mathbbR$ as additive groups.
answered Jul 29 at 12:51
Nicky Hekster
26.9k53052
26.9k53052
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865209%2findex-of-subgroup-of-real-number-in-complex-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Exactly right. . .
â Lubin
Jul 28 at 12:28