Convergence of integrals under weak convergence of measure and compact convergence

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to solve Problem 2.4.12 on page 64 of Karatzas-Shreve's book "Brownian motion and stochastic calculus":
enter image description here



My attempt is to use triangle inequality (denoting $Omega=C[0,infty)$)
$$|int_Omega f_ndP_n-int_Omega fdP|leq |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|+|int_Omega fdP_n-int_Omega fdP|quadstar,$$
and estimate the first term with dominated convergence, the second using weak convergence of the measures.



For $epsilon>0$, since $(P_n)_n$ is tight (by Prohorov thm) I can choose a compact $Ksubset Omega$ such that $P_n(K)geq 1-epsilon$.
Fix $mgeq1$, then by dominated convergence for $n$ large enough I have
$$ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|=|int_K (f_n-f)dP_m|+|int_K^c (f_n-f)dP_m|
leq epsilon+epsilonsup_ngeq1,omegain K^c|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|.$$



  1. To conclude I need $f$ to be bounded. Does this follow from the fact that $f$ is the compact-limit of uniformly bounded functions? (Note that I need boundedness also to use weak convergence on the second term of $star$)


  2. Is it correct that if $forall mgeq1$ $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|to_ntoinfty0$, then
    $ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|to_ntoinfty0?$
    To be fair I think it's true only if the first convergence is uniform in $m$.


Thanks in advance :)







share|cite|improve this question



















  • You know that the sequence is uniformly bounded, so the same bound holds also for the pointwise limit
    – Bob
    Jul 28 at 21:23










  • Re your 2nd question: What's wrong about doing the estimate for $m=n$?
    – saz
    Jul 29 at 5:39










  • @saz: by fixing $mgeq1,epsilon>0$ I found $N(epsilon,m)geq1$ such that $forall ngeq N(epsilon,m),$ $int_Omega(f_n-f)dP_m<epsilon$. My problem is that $N(epsilon,m)$ depends on $m$. How do I know that $sup_m N(epsilon,m)$ is finite?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 8:58











  • @Bob: thanks, since I have point-wise convergence and boundedness I even don't need to separate the integral in $K$ and $K^c$: I can apply dom convergence directly on $Omega$, right?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 9:45














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to solve Problem 2.4.12 on page 64 of Karatzas-Shreve's book "Brownian motion and stochastic calculus":
enter image description here



My attempt is to use triangle inequality (denoting $Omega=C[0,infty)$)
$$|int_Omega f_ndP_n-int_Omega fdP|leq |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|+|int_Omega fdP_n-int_Omega fdP|quadstar,$$
and estimate the first term with dominated convergence, the second using weak convergence of the measures.



For $epsilon>0$, since $(P_n)_n$ is tight (by Prohorov thm) I can choose a compact $Ksubset Omega$ such that $P_n(K)geq 1-epsilon$.
Fix $mgeq1$, then by dominated convergence for $n$ large enough I have
$$ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|=|int_K (f_n-f)dP_m|+|int_K^c (f_n-f)dP_m|
leq epsilon+epsilonsup_ngeq1,omegain K^c|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|.$$



  1. To conclude I need $f$ to be bounded. Does this follow from the fact that $f$ is the compact-limit of uniformly bounded functions? (Note that I need boundedness also to use weak convergence on the second term of $star$)


  2. Is it correct that if $forall mgeq1$ $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|to_ntoinfty0$, then
    $ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|to_ntoinfty0?$
    To be fair I think it's true only if the first convergence is uniform in $m$.


Thanks in advance :)







share|cite|improve this question



















  • You know that the sequence is uniformly bounded, so the same bound holds also for the pointwise limit
    – Bob
    Jul 28 at 21:23










  • Re your 2nd question: What's wrong about doing the estimate for $m=n$?
    – saz
    Jul 29 at 5:39










  • @saz: by fixing $mgeq1,epsilon>0$ I found $N(epsilon,m)geq1$ such that $forall ngeq N(epsilon,m),$ $int_Omega(f_n-f)dP_m<epsilon$. My problem is that $N(epsilon,m)$ depends on $m$. How do I know that $sup_m N(epsilon,m)$ is finite?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 8:58











  • @Bob: thanks, since I have point-wise convergence and boundedness I even don't need to separate the integral in $K$ and $K^c$: I can apply dom convergence directly on $Omega$, right?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 9:45












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to solve Problem 2.4.12 on page 64 of Karatzas-Shreve's book "Brownian motion and stochastic calculus":
enter image description here



My attempt is to use triangle inequality (denoting $Omega=C[0,infty)$)
$$|int_Omega f_ndP_n-int_Omega fdP|leq |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|+|int_Omega fdP_n-int_Omega fdP|quadstar,$$
and estimate the first term with dominated convergence, the second using weak convergence of the measures.



For $epsilon>0$, since $(P_n)_n$ is tight (by Prohorov thm) I can choose a compact $Ksubset Omega$ such that $P_n(K)geq 1-epsilon$.
Fix $mgeq1$, then by dominated convergence for $n$ large enough I have
$$ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|=|int_K (f_n-f)dP_m|+|int_K^c (f_n-f)dP_m|
leq epsilon+epsilonsup_ngeq1,omegain K^c|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|.$$



  1. To conclude I need $f$ to be bounded. Does this follow from the fact that $f$ is the compact-limit of uniformly bounded functions? (Note that I need boundedness also to use weak convergence on the second term of $star$)


  2. Is it correct that if $forall mgeq1$ $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|to_ntoinfty0$, then
    $ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|to_ntoinfty0?$
    To be fair I think it's true only if the first convergence is uniform in $m$.


Thanks in advance :)







share|cite|improve this question











I'm trying to solve Problem 2.4.12 on page 64 of Karatzas-Shreve's book "Brownian motion and stochastic calculus":
enter image description here



My attempt is to use triangle inequality (denoting $Omega=C[0,infty)$)
$$|int_Omega f_ndP_n-int_Omega fdP|leq |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|+|int_Omega fdP_n-int_Omega fdP|quadstar,$$
and estimate the first term with dominated convergence, the second using weak convergence of the measures.



For $epsilon>0$, since $(P_n)_n$ is tight (by Prohorov thm) I can choose a compact $Ksubset Omega$ such that $P_n(K)geq 1-epsilon$.
Fix $mgeq1$, then by dominated convergence for $n$ large enough I have
$$ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|=|int_K (f_n-f)dP_m|+|int_K^c (f_n-f)dP_m|
leq epsilon+epsilonsup_ngeq1,omegain K^c|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|.$$



  1. To conclude I need $f$ to be bounded. Does this follow from the fact that $f$ is the compact-limit of uniformly bounded functions? (Note that I need boundedness also to use weak convergence on the second term of $star$)


  2. Is it correct that if $forall mgeq1$ $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_m|to_ntoinfty0$, then
    $ |int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|to_ntoinfty0?$
    To be fair I think it's true only if the first convergence is uniform in $m$.


Thanks in advance :)









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 28 at 13:54









Demetrio Masciurett

285




285











  • You know that the sequence is uniformly bounded, so the same bound holds also for the pointwise limit
    – Bob
    Jul 28 at 21:23










  • Re your 2nd question: What's wrong about doing the estimate for $m=n$?
    – saz
    Jul 29 at 5:39










  • @saz: by fixing $mgeq1,epsilon>0$ I found $N(epsilon,m)geq1$ such that $forall ngeq N(epsilon,m),$ $int_Omega(f_n-f)dP_m<epsilon$. My problem is that $N(epsilon,m)$ depends on $m$. How do I know that $sup_m N(epsilon,m)$ is finite?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 8:58











  • @Bob: thanks, since I have point-wise convergence and boundedness I even don't need to separate the integral in $K$ and $K^c$: I can apply dom convergence directly on $Omega$, right?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 9:45
















  • You know that the sequence is uniformly bounded, so the same bound holds also for the pointwise limit
    – Bob
    Jul 28 at 21:23










  • Re your 2nd question: What's wrong about doing the estimate for $m=n$?
    – saz
    Jul 29 at 5:39










  • @saz: by fixing $mgeq1,epsilon>0$ I found $N(epsilon,m)geq1$ such that $forall ngeq N(epsilon,m),$ $int_Omega(f_n-f)dP_m<epsilon$. My problem is that $N(epsilon,m)$ depends on $m$. How do I know that $sup_m N(epsilon,m)$ is finite?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 8:58











  • @Bob: thanks, since I have point-wise convergence and boundedness I even don't need to separate the integral in $K$ and $K^c$: I can apply dom convergence directly on $Omega$, right?
    – Demetrio Masciurett
    Jul 29 at 9:45















You know that the sequence is uniformly bounded, so the same bound holds also for the pointwise limit
– Bob
Jul 28 at 21:23




You know that the sequence is uniformly bounded, so the same bound holds also for the pointwise limit
– Bob
Jul 28 at 21:23












Re your 2nd question: What's wrong about doing the estimate for $m=n$?
– saz
Jul 29 at 5:39




Re your 2nd question: What's wrong about doing the estimate for $m=n$?
– saz
Jul 29 at 5:39












@saz: by fixing $mgeq1,epsilon>0$ I found $N(epsilon,m)geq1$ such that $forall ngeq N(epsilon,m),$ $int_Omega(f_n-f)dP_m<epsilon$. My problem is that $N(epsilon,m)$ depends on $m$. How do I know that $sup_m N(epsilon,m)$ is finite?
– Demetrio Masciurett
Jul 29 at 8:58





@saz: by fixing $mgeq1,epsilon>0$ I found $N(epsilon,m)geq1$ such that $forall ngeq N(epsilon,m),$ $int_Omega(f_n-f)dP_m<epsilon$. My problem is that $N(epsilon,m)$ depends on $m$. How do I know that $sup_m N(epsilon,m)$ is finite?
– Demetrio Masciurett
Jul 29 at 8:58













@Bob: thanks, since I have point-wise convergence and boundedness I even don't need to separate the integral in $K$ and $K^c$: I can apply dom convergence directly on $Omega$, right?
– Demetrio Masciurett
Jul 29 at 9:45




@Bob: thanks, since I have point-wise convergence and boundedness I even don't need to separate the integral in $K$ and $K^c$: I can apply dom convergence directly on $Omega$, right?
– Demetrio Masciurett
Jul 29 at 9:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Finally got it:



$|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|leq int_K_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n +int_K^c_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n
leq sup_omegain K_epsilon|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|+epsilon||f_n-f||_infty.$



Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, letting $nto infty$ the last term goes to zero by uniform compact convergence of $(f_n)_ngeq 1$ to $f$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865266%2fconvergence-of-integrals-under-weak-convergence-of-measure-and-compact-convergen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Finally got it:



    $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|leq int_K_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n +int_K^c_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n
    leq sup_omegain K_epsilon|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|+epsilon||f_n-f||_infty.$



    Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, letting $nto infty$ the last term goes to zero by uniform compact convergence of $(f_n)_ngeq 1$ to $f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Finally got it:



      $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|leq int_K_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n +int_K^c_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n
      leq sup_omegain K_epsilon|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|+epsilon||f_n-f||_infty.$



      Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, letting $nto infty$ the last term goes to zero by uniform compact convergence of $(f_n)_ngeq 1$ to $f$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Finally got it:



        $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|leq int_K_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n +int_K^c_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n
        leq sup_omegain K_epsilon|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|+epsilon||f_n-f||_infty.$



        Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, letting $nto infty$ the last term goes to zero by uniform compact convergence of $(f_n)_ngeq 1$ to $f$.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Finally got it:



        $|int_Omega (f_n-f)dP_n|leq int_K_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n +int_K^c_epsilon |f_n-f|dP_n
        leq sup_omegain K_epsilon|f_n(omega)-f(omega)|+epsilon||f_n-f||_infty.$



        Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, letting $nto infty$ the last term goes to zero by uniform compact convergence of $(f_n)_ngeq 1$ to $f$.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Aug 4 at 11:59









        Demetrio Masciurett

        285




        285






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865266%2fconvergence-of-integrals-under-weak-convergence-of-measure-and-compact-convergen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?