Change to polar coordinate in ODEs

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Consider a planar ODE (e.g., $dotx=f_1(x,y),doty=f_2(x,y)$). According to page $68$ of ODE with Applications by Chicone, a change to polar coordinates (i.e., $x=rcos(theta),y=rsin(theta)$) in this system introduces a singularity on the line $(r,theta): r=0 $. Furthermore, if the original ODE has a rest point at the origin, this singularity is removable. Why is this true? What is the intuition? How can we prove this result?
Thank you.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Consider a planar ODE (e.g., $dotx=f_1(x,y),doty=f_2(x,y)$). According to page $68$ of ODE with Applications by Chicone, a change to polar coordinates (i.e., $x=rcos(theta),y=rsin(theta)$) in this system introduces a singularity on the line $(r,theta): r=0 $. Furthermore, if the original ODE has a rest point at the origin, this singularity is removable. Why is this true? What is the intuition? How can we prove this result?
    Thank you.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Consider a planar ODE (e.g., $dotx=f_1(x,y),doty=f_2(x,y)$). According to page $68$ of ODE with Applications by Chicone, a change to polar coordinates (i.e., $x=rcos(theta),y=rsin(theta)$) in this system introduces a singularity on the line $(r,theta): r=0 $. Furthermore, if the original ODE has a rest point at the origin, this singularity is removable. Why is this true? What is the intuition? How can we prove this result?
      Thank you.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Consider a planar ODE (e.g., $dotx=f_1(x,y),doty=f_2(x,y)$). According to page $68$ of ODE with Applications by Chicone, a change to polar coordinates (i.e., $x=rcos(theta),y=rsin(theta)$) in this system introduces a singularity on the line $(r,theta): r=0 $. Furthermore, if the original ODE has a rest point at the origin, this singularity is removable. Why is this true? What is the intuition? How can we prove this result?
      Thank you.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 21 at 20:05









      Arthur

      19812




      19812




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          From the equations $x= rcostheta$ and $y = rsin theta$ we see that the derivatives of $r$ and $theta$ are related to the derivatives of $x$ and $y$ by the equations
          begineqnarray*
          dot x & = & dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta\
          dot y & = & dot r sin theta + dot theta rcos theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Thus, using the notation $g_i(r, theta) = f_i(rcos theta, rsintheta)$ (i = 1, 2), the given system of ODEs reads
          begineqnarray*
          dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta & = & g_1(r, theta) \
          dot r sin theta + dot theta rcostheta & = & g_2(r, theta) .
          endeqnarray*
          Solving this for $dot r $ and $dot theta$ gives
          begineqnarray*
          dot r & = & g_1(r, theta)cos theta + g_2(r, theta) sin theta\
          dot theta & = & fracg_2(r, theta)rcostheta - fracg_1(r, theta)r sin theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Evidently, the right-hand side of the second equation has a problem at $r = 0$.



          To see why the problem at $r = 0$ is harmless when $(x,y) = (0,0)$ is a rest point, consider for $i = 1, 2$ the Taylor expansion of $g_i$ about $(r,theta) = (0,0)$. We have
          begineqnarray*
          g_i(r, theta)
          & = & g_i(0,0) + partial_rg_i(0,0)r + partial_theta g_i(0,0)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = & f_i(0,0) + left(partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sinthetaright)r + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0) rsin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0) rcosthetaright)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = &
          f_i (0,0) + rbig[partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sintheta + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0)sin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0)costhetaright)thetabig] + rm HOT’s
          endeqnarray*
          From this formula, we see that if $f_i(0,0) = 0$ then $g_i$ is of the form
          beginequation*
          g_i(r, theta) = rh_i(r, theta)
          endequation*
          for some smooth function $h_i$. In particular, $fracg_i(r, theta)r$ causes no trouble.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
            – Arthur
            Jul 22 at 16:15










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858843%2fchange-to-polar-coordinate-in-odes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          From the equations $x= rcostheta$ and $y = rsin theta$ we see that the derivatives of $r$ and $theta$ are related to the derivatives of $x$ and $y$ by the equations
          begineqnarray*
          dot x & = & dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta\
          dot y & = & dot r sin theta + dot theta rcos theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Thus, using the notation $g_i(r, theta) = f_i(rcos theta, rsintheta)$ (i = 1, 2), the given system of ODEs reads
          begineqnarray*
          dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta & = & g_1(r, theta) \
          dot r sin theta + dot theta rcostheta & = & g_2(r, theta) .
          endeqnarray*
          Solving this for $dot r $ and $dot theta$ gives
          begineqnarray*
          dot r & = & g_1(r, theta)cos theta + g_2(r, theta) sin theta\
          dot theta & = & fracg_2(r, theta)rcostheta - fracg_1(r, theta)r sin theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Evidently, the right-hand side of the second equation has a problem at $r = 0$.



          To see why the problem at $r = 0$ is harmless when $(x,y) = (0,0)$ is a rest point, consider for $i = 1, 2$ the Taylor expansion of $g_i$ about $(r,theta) = (0,0)$. We have
          begineqnarray*
          g_i(r, theta)
          & = & g_i(0,0) + partial_rg_i(0,0)r + partial_theta g_i(0,0)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = & f_i(0,0) + left(partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sinthetaright)r + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0) rsin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0) rcosthetaright)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = &
          f_i (0,0) + rbig[partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sintheta + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0)sin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0)costhetaright)thetabig] + rm HOT’s
          endeqnarray*
          From this formula, we see that if $f_i(0,0) = 0$ then $g_i$ is of the form
          beginequation*
          g_i(r, theta) = rh_i(r, theta)
          endequation*
          for some smooth function $h_i$. In particular, $fracg_i(r, theta)r$ causes no trouble.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
            – Arthur
            Jul 22 at 16:15














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          From the equations $x= rcostheta$ and $y = rsin theta$ we see that the derivatives of $r$ and $theta$ are related to the derivatives of $x$ and $y$ by the equations
          begineqnarray*
          dot x & = & dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta\
          dot y & = & dot r sin theta + dot theta rcos theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Thus, using the notation $g_i(r, theta) = f_i(rcos theta, rsintheta)$ (i = 1, 2), the given system of ODEs reads
          begineqnarray*
          dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta & = & g_1(r, theta) \
          dot r sin theta + dot theta rcostheta & = & g_2(r, theta) .
          endeqnarray*
          Solving this for $dot r $ and $dot theta$ gives
          begineqnarray*
          dot r & = & g_1(r, theta)cos theta + g_2(r, theta) sin theta\
          dot theta & = & fracg_2(r, theta)rcostheta - fracg_1(r, theta)r sin theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Evidently, the right-hand side of the second equation has a problem at $r = 0$.



          To see why the problem at $r = 0$ is harmless when $(x,y) = (0,0)$ is a rest point, consider for $i = 1, 2$ the Taylor expansion of $g_i$ about $(r,theta) = (0,0)$. We have
          begineqnarray*
          g_i(r, theta)
          & = & g_i(0,0) + partial_rg_i(0,0)r + partial_theta g_i(0,0)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = & f_i(0,0) + left(partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sinthetaright)r + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0) rsin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0) rcosthetaright)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = &
          f_i (0,0) + rbig[partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sintheta + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0)sin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0)costhetaright)thetabig] + rm HOT’s
          endeqnarray*
          From this formula, we see that if $f_i(0,0) = 0$ then $g_i$ is of the form
          beginequation*
          g_i(r, theta) = rh_i(r, theta)
          endequation*
          for some smooth function $h_i$. In particular, $fracg_i(r, theta)r$ causes no trouble.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
            – Arthur
            Jul 22 at 16:15












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          From the equations $x= rcostheta$ and $y = rsin theta$ we see that the derivatives of $r$ and $theta$ are related to the derivatives of $x$ and $y$ by the equations
          begineqnarray*
          dot x & = & dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta\
          dot y & = & dot r sin theta + dot theta rcos theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Thus, using the notation $g_i(r, theta) = f_i(rcos theta, rsintheta)$ (i = 1, 2), the given system of ODEs reads
          begineqnarray*
          dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta & = & g_1(r, theta) \
          dot r sin theta + dot theta rcostheta & = & g_2(r, theta) .
          endeqnarray*
          Solving this for $dot r $ and $dot theta$ gives
          begineqnarray*
          dot r & = & g_1(r, theta)cos theta + g_2(r, theta) sin theta\
          dot theta & = & fracg_2(r, theta)rcostheta - fracg_1(r, theta)r sin theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Evidently, the right-hand side of the second equation has a problem at $r = 0$.



          To see why the problem at $r = 0$ is harmless when $(x,y) = (0,0)$ is a rest point, consider for $i = 1, 2$ the Taylor expansion of $g_i$ about $(r,theta) = (0,0)$. We have
          begineqnarray*
          g_i(r, theta)
          & = & g_i(0,0) + partial_rg_i(0,0)r + partial_theta g_i(0,0)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = & f_i(0,0) + left(partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sinthetaright)r + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0) rsin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0) rcosthetaright)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = &
          f_i (0,0) + rbig[partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sintheta + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0)sin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0)costhetaright)thetabig] + rm HOT’s
          endeqnarray*
          From this formula, we see that if $f_i(0,0) = 0$ then $g_i$ is of the form
          beginequation*
          g_i(r, theta) = rh_i(r, theta)
          endequation*
          for some smooth function $h_i$. In particular, $fracg_i(r, theta)r$ causes no trouble.






          share|cite|improve this answer















          From the equations $x= rcostheta$ and $y = rsin theta$ we see that the derivatives of $r$ and $theta$ are related to the derivatives of $x$ and $y$ by the equations
          begineqnarray*
          dot x & = & dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta\
          dot y & = & dot r sin theta + dot theta rcos theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Thus, using the notation $g_i(r, theta) = f_i(rcos theta, rsintheta)$ (i = 1, 2), the given system of ODEs reads
          begineqnarray*
          dot r cos theta - dot theta rsin theta & = & g_1(r, theta) \
          dot r sin theta + dot theta rcostheta & = & g_2(r, theta) .
          endeqnarray*
          Solving this for $dot r $ and $dot theta$ gives
          begineqnarray*
          dot r & = & g_1(r, theta)cos theta + g_2(r, theta) sin theta\
          dot theta & = & fracg_2(r, theta)rcostheta - fracg_1(r, theta)r sin theta.
          endeqnarray*
          Evidently, the right-hand side of the second equation has a problem at $r = 0$.



          To see why the problem at $r = 0$ is harmless when $(x,y) = (0,0)$ is a rest point, consider for $i = 1, 2$ the Taylor expansion of $g_i$ about $(r,theta) = (0,0)$. We have
          begineqnarray*
          g_i(r, theta)
          & = & g_i(0,0) + partial_rg_i(0,0)r + partial_theta g_i(0,0)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = & f_i(0,0) + left(partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sinthetaright)r + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0) rsin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0) rcosthetaright)theta + rm HOT’s\
          & = &
          f_i (0,0) + rbig[partial_x f_i(0,0) costheta + partial_y f_i(0,0) sintheta + left(- partial_x f_i(0,0)sin theta + partial_y f_i(0,0)costhetaright)thetabig] + rm HOT’s
          endeqnarray*
          From this formula, we see that if $f_i(0,0) = 0$ then $g_i$ is of the form
          beginequation*
          g_i(r, theta) = rh_i(r, theta)
          endequation*
          for some smooth function $h_i$. In particular, $fracg_i(r, theta)r$ causes no trouble.







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 22 at 16:12









          Arthur

          19812




          19812











          answered Jul 22 at 13:26









          BindersFull

          498110




          498110











          • Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
            – Arthur
            Jul 22 at 16:15
















          • Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
            – Arthur
            Jul 22 at 16:15















          Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
          – Arthur
          Jul 22 at 16:15




          Thanks for the proof. Additionally, if the original vector field $f$ is in $C^r$, then the desingularized vector field is in $C^r-1$.
          – Arthur
          Jul 22 at 16:15












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858843%2fchange-to-polar-coordinate-in-odes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?