Convexity and entropy for conservation laws
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am reading Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws by Godlewski and Raviart (1).
- While defining the entropy why do we consider only convex flux?
Can it be extended to general entropy flux? Please suggest me the reference. - I understood that entropy conditions are the conditions which assures the uniqueness of the solution. Why do we call them as entropy condition? Is it related to the entropy which we study in Thermodynamics?
(1) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Ellipses, 1991.
pde hyperbolic-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am reading Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws by Godlewski and Raviart (1).
- While defining the entropy why do we consider only convex flux?
Can it be extended to general entropy flux? Please suggest me the reference. - I understood that entropy conditions are the conditions which assures the uniqueness of the solution. Why do we call them as entropy condition? Is it related to the entropy which we study in Thermodynamics?
(1) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Ellipses, 1991.
pde hyperbolic-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am reading Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws by Godlewski and Raviart (1).
- While defining the entropy why do we consider only convex flux?
Can it be extended to general entropy flux? Please suggest me the reference. - I understood that entropy conditions are the conditions which assures the uniqueness of the solution. Why do we call them as entropy condition? Is it related to the entropy which we study in Thermodynamics?
(1) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Ellipses, 1991.
pde hyperbolic-equations
I am reading Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws by Godlewski and Raviart (1).
- While defining the entropy why do we consider only convex flux?
Can it be extended to general entropy flux? Please suggest me the reference. - I understood that entropy conditions are the conditions which assures the uniqueness of the solution. Why do we call them as entropy condition? Is it related to the entropy which we study in Thermodynamics?
(1) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Ellipses, 1991.
pde hyperbolic-equations
edited Aug 9 at 6:28


Harry49
4,6661825
4,6661825
asked Jul 26 at 6:11
Rosy
643
643
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Let us consider the scalar one-dimensional case $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ for sake of simplicity, as described in Section 3.8 of (1).
An entropy function $eta$ is a convex function of $u$ which satisfies the conservation law $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x = 0$, where $psi$ is the entropy flux. In the definition, neither the flux $f$ nor the entropy flux $psi$ is convex, but only $eta$ is convex. This is a conventional choice with important consequences, "though one may consider a more general
framework" (2). If $eta$ is chosen convex, then the vanishing viscosity weak solution -- i.e., the physically relevant weak solution -- makes the entropy decrease in the weak sense. This leads to the definition of the entropy solution, which is a weak solution $u$ such that $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x leq 0$ weakly for all convex entropy function $eta$.
As such, the definition of an entropy function $eta$ is not related to the thermodynamical notion of entropy. Firstly, it decreases over time, while the entropy increases in thermodynamics. However, there may be a link with the thermodynamical entropy for some particular systems. In the case of Eulerian gas dynamics, a natural mathematical entropy function is defined with respect to the thermodynamical entropy (cf. Section II.2 of (2)).
(1) R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1
(2) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0713-9
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Let us consider the scalar one-dimensional case $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ for sake of simplicity, as described in Section 3.8 of (1).
An entropy function $eta$ is a convex function of $u$ which satisfies the conservation law $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x = 0$, where $psi$ is the entropy flux. In the definition, neither the flux $f$ nor the entropy flux $psi$ is convex, but only $eta$ is convex. This is a conventional choice with important consequences, "though one may consider a more general
framework" (2). If $eta$ is chosen convex, then the vanishing viscosity weak solution -- i.e., the physically relevant weak solution -- makes the entropy decrease in the weak sense. This leads to the definition of the entropy solution, which is a weak solution $u$ such that $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x leq 0$ weakly for all convex entropy function $eta$.
As such, the definition of an entropy function $eta$ is not related to the thermodynamical notion of entropy. Firstly, it decreases over time, while the entropy increases in thermodynamics. However, there may be a link with the thermodynamical entropy for some particular systems. In the case of Eulerian gas dynamics, a natural mathematical entropy function is defined with respect to the thermodynamical entropy (cf. Section II.2 of (2)).
(1) R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1
(2) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0713-9
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Let us consider the scalar one-dimensional case $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ for sake of simplicity, as described in Section 3.8 of (1).
An entropy function $eta$ is a convex function of $u$ which satisfies the conservation law $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x = 0$, where $psi$ is the entropy flux. In the definition, neither the flux $f$ nor the entropy flux $psi$ is convex, but only $eta$ is convex. This is a conventional choice with important consequences, "though one may consider a more general
framework" (2). If $eta$ is chosen convex, then the vanishing viscosity weak solution -- i.e., the physically relevant weak solution -- makes the entropy decrease in the weak sense. This leads to the definition of the entropy solution, which is a weak solution $u$ such that $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x leq 0$ weakly for all convex entropy function $eta$.
As such, the definition of an entropy function $eta$ is not related to the thermodynamical notion of entropy. Firstly, it decreases over time, while the entropy increases in thermodynamics. However, there may be a link with the thermodynamical entropy for some particular systems. In the case of Eulerian gas dynamics, a natural mathematical entropy function is defined with respect to the thermodynamical entropy (cf. Section II.2 of (2)).
(1) R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1
(2) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0713-9
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Let us consider the scalar one-dimensional case $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ for sake of simplicity, as described in Section 3.8 of (1).
An entropy function $eta$ is a convex function of $u$ which satisfies the conservation law $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x = 0$, where $psi$ is the entropy flux. In the definition, neither the flux $f$ nor the entropy flux $psi$ is convex, but only $eta$ is convex. This is a conventional choice with important consequences, "though one may consider a more general
framework" (2). If $eta$ is chosen convex, then the vanishing viscosity weak solution -- i.e., the physically relevant weak solution -- makes the entropy decrease in the weak sense. This leads to the definition of the entropy solution, which is a weak solution $u$ such that $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x leq 0$ weakly for all convex entropy function $eta$.
As such, the definition of an entropy function $eta$ is not related to the thermodynamical notion of entropy. Firstly, it decreases over time, while the entropy increases in thermodynamics. However, there may be a link with the thermodynamical entropy for some particular systems. In the case of Eulerian gas dynamics, a natural mathematical entropy function is defined with respect to the thermodynamical entropy (cf. Section II.2 of (2)).
(1) R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1
(2) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0713-9
Let us consider the scalar one-dimensional case $u_t + f(u)_x = 0$ for sake of simplicity, as described in Section 3.8 of (1).
An entropy function $eta$ is a convex function of $u$ which satisfies the conservation law $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x = 0$, where $psi$ is the entropy flux. In the definition, neither the flux $f$ nor the entropy flux $psi$ is convex, but only $eta$ is convex. This is a conventional choice with important consequences, "though one may consider a more general
framework" (2). If $eta$ is chosen convex, then the vanishing viscosity weak solution -- i.e., the physically relevant weak solution -- makes the entropy decrease in the weak sense. This leads to the definition of the entropy solution, which is a weak solution $u$ such that $eta(u)_t + psi(u)_x leq 0$ weakly for all convex entropy function $eta$.
As such, the definition of an entropy function $eta$ is not related to the thermodynamical notion of entropy. Firstly, it decreases over time, while the entropy increases in thermodynamics. However, there may be a link with the thermodynamical entropy for some particular systems. In the case of Eulerian gas dynamics, a natural mathematical entropy function is defined with respect to the thermodynamical entropy (cf. Section II.2 of (2)).
(1) R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1
(2) E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0713-9
edited Aug 9 at 6:30
answered Aug 8 at 14:38


Harry49
4,6661825
4,6661825
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863112%2fconvexity-and-entropy-for-conservation-laws%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password