Let $f:Vto BbbR $, such that $fneq 0$. Prove that $f$ is surjective.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $V$ be a vector space over $BbbR$ such that $dim V=n,;ngeq 2$ and $$f:Vto BbbR $$ be linear such that $fneq 0.$
I want to



  1. prove that $f$ is surjective,


  2. prove or disprove that $f$ is injective,


  3. I also want to find $dim ker f.$


I think that it suffices to prove that $operatornameImf= BbbR.$ We have the following inclusion:



$$operatornameImf= f(x)inBbbR:xin Vsubset BbbR,$$ but I'm finding it hard to prove that $$BbbRsubsetoperatornameImf= f(x):xin V.$$



For kernel, we have that



$ker f= xin V:f(x)=0,$ but I am stuck at this point.



No.3 is not a problem, since $dim V=dim ker f+ dim operatornameImf.$ Can anyone help me out?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • $V = BbbR^n $ and observe what happens in those case and then generalize
    – Panchal Shamsundar
    Jul 30 at 16:03















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $V$ be a vector space over $BbbR$ such that $dim V=n,;ngeq 2$ and $$f:Vto BbbR $$ be linear such that $fneq 0.$
I want to



  1. prove that $f$ is surjective,


  2. prove or disprove that $f$ is injective,


  3. I also want to find $dim ker f.$


I think that it suffices to prove that $operatornameImf= BbbR.$ We have the following inclusion:



$$operatornameImf= f(x)inBbbR:xin Vsubset BbbR,$$ but I'm finding it hard to prove that $$BbbRsubsetoperatornameImf= f(x):xin V.$$



For kernel, we have that



$ker f= xin V:f(x)=0,$ but I am stuck at this point.



No.3 is not a problem, since $dim V=dim ker f+ dim operatornameImf.$ Can anyone help me out?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • $V = BbbR^n $ and observe what happens in those case and then generalize
    – Panchal Shamsundar
    Jul 30 at 16:03













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $V$ be a vector space over $BbbR$ such that $dim V=n,;ngeq 2$ and $$f:Vto BbbR $$ be linear such that $fneq 0.$
I want to



  1. prove that $f$ is surjective,


  2. prove or disprove that $f$ is injective,


  3. I also want to find $dim ker f.$


I think that it suffices to prove that $operatornameImf= BbbR.$ We have the following inclusion:



$$operatornameImf= f(x)inBbbR:xin Vsubset BbbR,$$ but I'm finding it hard to prove that $$BbbRsubsetoperatornameImf= f(x):xin V.$$



For kernel, we have that



$ker f= xin V:f(x)=0,$ but I am stuck at this point.



No.3 is not a problem, since $dim V=dim ker f+ dim operatornameImf.$ Can anyone help me out?







share|cite|improve this question











Let $V$ be a vector space over $BbbR$ such that $dim V=n,;ngeq 2$ and $$f:Vto BbbR $$ be linear such that $fneq 0.$
I want to



  1. prove that $f$ is surjective,


  2. prove or disprove that $f$ is injective,


  3. I also want to find $dim ker f.$


I think that it suffices to prove that $operatornameImf= BbbR.$ We have the following inclusion:



$$operatornameImf= f(x)inBbbR:xin Vsubset BbbR,$$ but I'm finding it hard to prove that $$BbbRsubsetoperatornameImf= f(x):xin V.$$



For kernel, we have that



$ker f= xin V:f(x)=0,$ but I am stuck at this point.



No.3 is not a problem, since $dim V=dim ker f+ dim operatornameImf.$ Can anyone help me out?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 30 at 15:47









Mike

58712




58712











  • $V = BbbR^n $ and observe what happens in those case and then generalize
    – Panchal Shamsundar
    Jul 30 at 16:03

















  • $V = BbbR^n $ and observe what happens in those case and then generalize
    – Panchal Shamsundar
    Jul 30 at 16:03
















$V = BbbR^n $ and observe what happens in those case and then generalize
– Panchal Shamsundar
Jul 30 at 16:03





$V = BbbR^n $ and observe what happens in those case and then generalize
– Panchal Shamsundar
Jul 30 at 16:03











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













For $1$, use the fact that $f(cx)=cf(x)$ for all $cinBbbR$.



For $2$, use the fact that $f$ is injective if and only if $dimker f=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    $f$ is surjective: Since $fneq 0$, there is $x in mathbbR$ such that there is $vin V: f(v)=x$. We have to find a preimage for an arbitrary $ain mathbbR$:
    Just calculate $f(fracaxcdot v)$ by using linearity.



    About injectiveness: A surjective linear map that is also injective is an isomorphism. Compare the dimensions of $mathbbR$ and $V$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • additional you say more about dual map.
      – Ninja hatori
      Jul 30 at 15:57







    • 1




      @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
      – Babelfish
      Jul 30 at 16:03










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867145%2flet-fv-to-bbbr-such-that-f-neq-0-prove-that-f-is-surjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    For $1$, use the fact that $f(cx)=cf(x)$ for all $cinBbbR$.



    For $2$, use the fact that $f$ is injective if and only if $dimker f=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      For $1$, use the fact that $f(cx)=cf(x)$ for all $cinBbbR$.



      For $2$, use the fact that $f$ is injective if and only if $dimker f=0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        For $1$, use the fact that $f(cx)=cf(x)$ for all $cinBbbR$.



        For $2$, use the fact that $f$ is injective if and only if $dimker f=0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        For $1$, use the fact that $f(cx)=cf(x)$ for all $cinBbbR$.



        For $2$, use the fact that $f$ is injective if and only if $dimker f=0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 30 at 15:51









        Servaes

        20k33484




        20k33484




















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            $f$ is surjective: Since $fneq 0$, there is $x in mathbbR$ such that there is $vin V: f(v)=x$. We have to find a preimage for an arbitrary $ain mathbbR$:
            Just calculate $f(fracaxcdot v)$ by using linearity.



            About injectiveness: A surjective linear map that is also injective is an isomorphism. Compare the dimensions of $mathbbR$ and $V$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • additional you say more about dual map.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 30 at 15:57







            • 1




              @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
              – Babelfish
              Jul 30 at 16:03














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            $f$ is surjective: Since $fneq 0$, there is $x in mathbbR$ such that there is $vin V: f(v)=x$. We have to find a preimage for an arbitrary $ain mathbbR$:
            Just calculate $f(fracaxcdot v)$ by using linearity.



            About injectiveness: A surjective linear map that is also injective is an isomorphism. Compare the dimensions of $mathbbR$ and $V$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • additional you say more about dual map.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 30 at 15:57







            • 1




              @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
              – Babelfish
              Jul 30 at 16:03












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            $f$ is surjective: Since $fneq 0$, there is $x in mathbbR$ such that there is $vin V: f(v)=x$. We have to find a preimage for an arbitrary $ain mathbbR$:
            Just calculate $f(fracaxcdot v)$ by using linearity.



            About injectiveness: A surjective linear map that is also injective is an isomorphism. Compare the dimensions of $mathbbR$ and $V$.






            share|cite|improve this answer













            $f$ is surjective: Since $fneq 0$, there is $x in mathbbR$ such that there is $vin V: f(v)=x$. We have to find a preimage for an arbitrary $ain mathbbR$:
            Just calculate $f(fracaxcdot v)$ by using linearity.



            About injectiveness: A surjective linear map that is also injective is an isomorphism. Compare the dimensions of $mathbbR$ and $V$.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Jul 30 at 15:55









            Babelfish

            408112




            408112











            • additional you say more about dual map.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 30 at 15:57







            • 1




              @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
              – Babelfish
              Jul 30 at 16:03
















            • additional you say more about dual map.
              – Ninja hatori
              Jul 30 at 15:57







            • 1




              @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
              – Babelfish
              Jul 30 at 16:03















            additional you say more about dual map.
            – Ninja hatori
            Jul 30 at 15:57





            additional you say more about dual map.
            – Ninja hatori
            Jul 30 at 15:57





            1




            1




            @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
            – Babelfish
            Jul 30 at 16:03




            @Ninjahatori Excuse me, I don't really understand your comment. There is no use of dual maps in my answer. I guess that the TO is not familiar to the dual space, given his question. Do you really think that incorporating dual maps would improve the answer?
            – Babelfish
            Jul 30 at 16:03












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867145%2flet-fv-to-bbbr-such-that-f-neq-0-prove-that-f-is-surjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?