Show that the set of $fin L^1$ so that $fnotin L^p$ is residual.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Consider $L^p([0,1])$ with Lebesgue measure. Note that if $fin L^p$ with $p>1$ then $fin L^1$. Show that the set of $fin L^1$ so that $fnotin L^p$ is residual.



First of all, a set $Esubset X$ is define to be generic if its complement is of the first category.



If we consider the set $$A_N:=leftfin L^1: displaystyleint_Ifleq Nm(I)^1-frac1pmbox for all intervals $I$ right$$



How can I prove this set is nowhere dense?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Consider $L^p([0,1])$ with Lebesgue measure. Note that if $fin L^p$ with $p>1$ then $fin L^1$. Show that the set of $fin L^1$ so that $fnotin L^p$ is residual.



    First of all, a set $Esubset X$ is define to be generic if its complement is of the first category.



    If we consider the set $$A_N:=leftfin L^1: displaystyleint_Ifleq Nm(I)^1-frac1pmbox for all intervals $I$ right$$



    How can I prove this set is nowhere dense?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Consider $L^p([0,1])$ with Lebesgue measure. Note that if $fin L^p$ with $p>1$ then $fin L^1$. Show that the set of $fin L^1$ so that $fnotin L^p$ is residual.



      First of all, a set $Esubset X$ is define to be generic if its complement is of the first category.



      If we consider the set $$A_N:=leftfin L^1: displaystyleint_Ifleq Nm(I)^1-frac1pmbox for all intervals $I$ right$$



      How can I prove this set is nowhere dense?







      share|cite|improve this question













      Consider $L^p([0,1])$ with Lebesgue measure. Note that if $fin L^p$ with $p>1$ then $fin L^1$. Show that the set of $fin L^1$ so that $fnotin L^p$ is residual.



      First of all, a set $Esubset X$ is define to be generic if its complement is of the first category.



      If we consider the set $$A_N:=leftfin L^1: displaystyleint_Ifleq Nm(I)^1-frac1pmbox for all intervals $I$ right$$



      How can I prove this set is nowhere dense?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 30 at 8:45









      Davide Giraudo

      121k15146249




      121k15146249









      asked Jul 30 at 7:32









      julios

      564




      564




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Hint: If $int |f|^p > N$, show there is $h in L^infty$ such that $int h f > N$. Conclude that $f$ is open. To show it is dense, consider adding to any $f in L^1$ some function with small $L^1$ norm but large $L^p$ norm.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Proof of the fact that $A_N$ is nowhere dense: Fatou's Lemma shows that $A_N$ is closed in $L^1$; suppose $A_N$ has an interior point $g$. Then there exists $r>0$ such that $||f-g||_1 <r$ implies $f in A_N$. By triangle inequality we get $int_I |f| leq 2N m(I)^1-frac 1 p $ for any interval $I$ whenever $||f||_1 <r$. Take $I=(0,c)$ and $f(x)=ax^alpha$ where $alpha in (-1,-frac 1 p)$ and $0<a<r(1+alpha)$. Then $||f||_1 <r$, and $int_I |f| =int_0^c ax^alpha =a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1$ so $a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1 leq 2N c^1-frac 1 p $. Dividing by $c^1+alpha$ and letting $c to 0$ we get a contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
              – julios
              Jul 31 at 0:41










            • You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Jul 31 at 5:26










            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866738%2fshow-that-the-set-of-f-in-l1-so-that-f-notin-lp-is-residual%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Hint: If $int |f|^p > N$, show there is $h in L^infty$ such that $int h f > N$. Conclude that $f$ is open. To show it is dense, consider adding to any $f in L^1$ some function with small $L^1$ norm but large $L^p$ norm.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Hint: If $int |f|^p > N$, show there is $h in L^infty$ such that $int h f > N$. Conclude that $f$ is open. To show it is dense, consider adding to any $f in L^1$ some function with small $L^1$ norm but large $L^p$ norm.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Hint: If $int |f|^p > N$, show there is $h in L^infty$ such that $int h f > N$. Conclude that $f$ is open. To show it is dense, consider adding to any $f in L^1$ some function with small $L^1$ norm but large $L^p$ norm.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Hint: If $int |f|^p > N$, show there is $h in L^infty$ such that $int h f > N$. Conclude that $f$ is open. To show it is dense, consider adding to any $f in L^1$ some function with small $L^1$ norm but large $L^p$ norm.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 30 at 7:50









                Robert Israel

                303k22201440




                303k22201440




















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Proof of the fact that $A_N$ is nowhere dense: Fatou's Lemma shows that $A_N$ is closed in $L^1$; suppose $A_N$ has an interior point $g$. Then there exists $r>0$ such that $||f-g||_1 <r$ implies $f in A_N$. By triangle inequality we get $int_I |f| leq 2N m(I)^1-frac 1 p $ for any interval $I$ whenever $||f||_1 <r$. Take $I=(0,c)$ and $f(x)=ax^alpha$ where $alpha in (-1,-frac 1 p)$ and $0<a<r(1+alpha)$. Then $||f||_1 <r$, and $int_I |f| =int_0^c ax^alpha =a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1$ so $a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1 leq 2N c^1-frac 1 p $. Dividing by $c^1+alpha$ and letting $c to 0$ we get a contradiction.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
                      – julios
                      Jul 31 at 0:41










                    • You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Jul 31 at 5:26














                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Proof of the fact that $A_N$ is nowhere dense: Fatou's Lemma shows that $A_N$ is closed in $L^1$; suppose $A_N$ has an interior point $g$. Then there exists $r>0$ such that $||f-g||_1 <r$ implies $f in A_N$. By triangle inequality we get $int_I |f| leq 2N m(I)^1-frac 1 p $ for any interval $I$ whenever $||f||_1 <r$. Take $I=(0,c)$ and $f(x)=ax^alpha$ where $alpha in (-1,-frac 1 p)$ and $0<a<r(1+alpha)$. Then $||f||_1 <r$, and $int_I |f| =int_0^c ax^alpha =a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1$ so $a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1 leq 2N c^1-frac 1 p $. Dividing by $c^1+alpha$ and letting $c to 0$ we get a contradiction.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
                      – julios
                      Jul 31 at 0:41










                    • You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Jul 31 at 5:26












                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    Proof of the fact that $A_N$ is nowhere dense: Fatou's Lemma shows that $A_N$ is closed in $L^1$; suppose $A_N$ has an interior point $g$. Then there exists $r>0$ such that $||f-g||_1 <r$ implies $f in A_N$. By triangle inequality we get $int_I |f| leq 2N m(I)^1-frac 1 p $ for any interval $I$ whenever $||f||_1 <r$. Take $I=(0,c)$ and $f(x)=ax^alpha$ where $alpha in (-1,-frac 1 p)$ and $0<a<r(1+alpha)$. Then $||f||_1 <r$, and $int_I |f| =int_0^c ax^alpha =a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1$ so $a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1 leq 2N c^1-frac 1 p $. Dividing by $c^1+alpha$ and letting $c to 0$ we get a contradiction.






                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    Proof of the fact that $A_N$ is nowhere dense: Fatou's Lemma shows that $A_N$ is closed in $L^1$; suppose $A_N$ has an interior point $g$. Then there exists $r>0$ such that $||f-g||_1 <r$ implies $f in A_N$. By triangle inequality we get $int_I |f| leq 2N m(I)^1-frac 1 p $ for any interval $I$ whenever $||f||_1 <r$. Take $I=(0,c)$ and $f(x)=ax^alpha$ where $alpha in (-1,-frac 1 p)$ and $0<a<r(1+alpha)$. Then $||f||_1 <r$, and $int_I |f| =int_0^c ax^alpha =a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1$ so $a frac c^1+alpha alpha +1 leq 2N c^1-frac 1 p $. Dividing by $c^1+alpha$ and letting $c to 0$ we get a contradiction.







                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    answered Jul 30 at 8:36









                    Kavi Rama Murthy

                    19.7k2829




                    19.7k2829











                    • Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
                      – julios
                      Jul 31 at 0:41










                    • You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Jul 31 at 5:26
















                    • Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
                      – julios
                      Jul 31 at 0:41










                    • You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Jul 31 at 5:26















                    Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
                    – julios
                    Jul 31 at 0:41




                    Thanks for your answer. I have a little doubt, when you divide by $c^1+alpha$ and let $cto 0$, you have $int_Iftoinfty$, and this is the contradiction?
                    – julios
                    Jul 31 at 0:41












                    You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
                    – Kavi Rama Murthy
                    Jul 31 at 5:26




                    You get the contradiction $frac a alpha +1=0$.
                    – Kavi Rama Murthy
                    Jul 31 at 5:26












                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866738%2fshow-that-the-set-of-f-in-l1-so-that-f-notin-lp-is-residual%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?