How to bound this series
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently reading through Tsybakov's Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics, and in it, he uses the estimate
$$left(sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2betaright)^1/2 = Oleft(n^-beta + 1/2right)$$
(here $beta > 0$ if that is important) or in other words,
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2beta = Oleft(n^-2beta + 1right)$$
o more abstractly, one might even prove that (with proper assumptions on $k$ if necessary)
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-k = Oleft(n^-k + 1right)$$
This is a bit different than what I usually encounter, the trickiness arising because the summation index is in the base, not the exponent. How does one go about proving such an estimate?
sequences-and-series analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently reading through Tsybakov's Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics, and in it, he uses the estimate
$$left(sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2betaright)^1/2 = Oleft(n^-beta + 1/2right)$$
(here $beta > 0$ if that is important) or in other words,
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2beta = Oleft(n^-2beta + 1right)$$
o more abstractly, one might even prove that (with proper assumptions on $k$ if necessary)
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-k = Oleft(n^-k + 1right)$$
This is a bit different than what I usually encounter, the trickiness arising because the summation index is in the base, not the exponent. How does one go about proving such an estimate?
sequences-and-series analysis
1
Try a comparison series/integral...
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:52
Right, that was silly...
â stats_model
Jul 30 at 1:58
We all fail to see something now and then... not that silly.
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently reading through Tsybakov's Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics, and in it, he uses the estimate
$$left(sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2betaright)^1/2 = Oleft(n^-beta + 1/2right)$$
(here $beta > 0$ if that is important) or in other words,
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2beta = Oleft(n^-2beta + 1right)$$
o more abstractly, one might even prove that (with proper assumptions on $k$ if necessary)
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-k = Oleft(n^-k + 1right)$$
This is a bit different than what I usually encounter, the trickiness arising because the summation index is in the base, not the exponent. How does one go about proving such an estimate?
sequences-and-series analysis
I am currently reading through Tsybakov's Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics, and in it, he uses the estimate
$$left(sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2betaright)^1/2 = Oleft(n^-beta + 1/2right)$$
(here $beta > 0$ if that is important) or in other words,
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-2beta = Oleft(n^-2beta + 1right)$$
o more abstractly, one might even prove that (with proper assumptions on $k$ if necessary)
$$sum_m=n^infty (m-1)^-k = Oleft(n^-k + 1right)$$
This is a bit different than what I usually encounter, the trickiness arising because the summation index is in the base, not the exponent. How does one go about proving such an estimate?
sequences-and-series analysis
asked Jul 30 at 1:41
stats_model
55339
55339
1
Try a comparison series/integral...
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:52
Right, that was silly...
â stats_model
Jul 30 at 1:58
We all fail to see something now and then... not that silly.
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:59
add a comment |Â
1
Try a comparison series/integral...
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:52
Right, that was silly...
â stats_model
Jul 30 at 1:58
We all fail to see something now and then... not that silly.
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:59
1
1
Try a comparison series/integral...
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:52
Try a comparison series/integral...
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:52
Right, that was silly...
â stats_model
Jul 30 at 1:58
Right, that was silly...
â stats_model
Jul 30 at 1:58
We all fail to see something now and then... not that silly.
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:59
We all fail to see something now and then... not that silly.
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:59
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866596%2fhow-to-bound-this-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Try a comparison series/integral...
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:52
Right, that was silly...
â stats_model
Jul 30 at 1:58
We all fail to see something now and then... not that silly.
â Clement C.
Jul 30 at 1:59