Systems of DE (Eigenvectors) [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In a $2times 2$ system of differential equations with initial conditions how are the unknowns in the general solution ($C_1$ and $C_2$) calculated given that there are an infinite number of eigenvectors possible? Won't that fact, which i'm assuming is true, yield infinitely many solutions, all affecting how the solution trajectories look?



Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos Jul 30 at 22:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • D.E. problems require initial conditions in order to find particular solutions.
    – é«˜ç”°èˆª
    Jul 29 at 23:57










  • I understand that but the general form of the solution for these types of equations have the eigenvector for each eigenvalue in them. I'm asking since there are many possible eigenvectors does any constant multiple of them give a correct answer?
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:01














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In a $2times 2$ system of differential equations with initial conditions how are the unknowns in the general solution ($C_1$ and $C_2$) calculated given that there are an infinite number of eigenvectors possible? Won't that fact, which i'm assuming is true, yield infinitely many solutions, all affecting how the solution trajectories look?



Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos Jul 30 at 22:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • D.E. problems require initial conditions in order to find particular solutions.
    – é«˜ç”°èˆª
    Jul 29 at 23:57










  • I understand that but the general form of the solution for these types of equations have the eigenvector for each eigenvalue in them. I'm asking since there are many possible eigenvectors does any constant multiple of them give a correct answer?
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:01












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In a $2times 2$ system of differential equations with initial conditions how are the unknowns in the general solution ($C_1$ and $C_2$) calculated given that there are an infinite number of eigenvectors possible? Won't that fact, which i'm assuming is true, yield infinitely many solutions, all affecting how the solution trajectories look?



Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question













In a $2times 2$ system of differential equations with initial conditions how are the unknowns in the general solution ($C_1$ and $C_2$) calculated given that there are an infinite number of eigenvectors possible? Won't that fact, which i'm assuming is true, yield infinitely many solutions, all affecting how the solution trajectories look?



Thanks.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 30 at 12:47









Harry Peter

5,44311438




5,44311438









asked Jul 29 at 23:56









MisterOH

193




193




closed as off-topic by amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos Jul 30 at 22:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos Jul 30 at 22:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, Taroccoesbrocco, Mostafa Ayaz, Rhys Steele, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • D.E. problems require initial conditions in order to find particular solutions.
    – é«˜ç”°èˆª
    Jul 29 at 23:57










  • I understand that but the general form of the solution for these types of equations have the eigenvector for each eigenvalue in them. I'm asking since there are many possible eigenvectors does any constant multiple of them give a correct answer?
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:01
















  • D.E. problems require initial conditions in order to find particular solutions.
    – é«˜ç”°èˆª
    Jul 29 at 23:57










  • I understand that but the general form of the solution for these types of equations have the eigenvector for each eigenvalue in them. I'm asking since there are many possible eigenvectors does any constant multiple of them give a correct answer?
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:01















D.E. problems require initial conditions in order to find particular solutions.
– é«˜ç”°èˆª
Jul 29 at 23:57




D.E. problems require initial conditions in order to find particular solutions.
– é«˜ç”°èˆª
Jul 29 at 23:57












I understand that but the general form of the solution for these types of equations have the eigenvector for each eigenvalue in them. I'm asking since there are many possible eigenvectors does any constant multiple of them give a correct answer?
– MisterOH
Jul 30 at 0:01




I understand that but the general form of the solution for these types of equations have the eigenvector for each eigenvalue in them. I'm asking since there are many possible eigenvectors does any constant multiple of them give a correct answer?
– MisterOH
Jul 30 at 0:01










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










The general form solution should be (with real eigenvalues) $$vecx(t)=c_1e^lambda_1tveceta_1+c_2e^lambda_2tveceta_2$$ where $lambda$ are the eigenvalues and $veceta$ are the eigenvectors. The arbitrary constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ are there because, as you say, there are an infinite amount of eigenvectors that satisfy the system, which is why we need the initial conditions.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:36

















up vote
0
down vote













In order to find the general solution you only need two linearly independent eigenvectors along with the eigenvalues. The general solution is $$y= C_1 e^lambda _1tV_1 + C_2 e^lambda _2tV_2$$ where the coefficients are found from the initial values.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The general form solution should be (with real eigenvalues) $$vecx(t)=c_1e^lambda_1tveceta_1+c_2e^lambda_2tveceta_2$$ where $lambda$ are the eigenvalues and $veceta$ are the eigenvectors. The arbitrary constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ are there because, as you say, there are an infinite amount of eigenvectors that satisfy the system, which is why we need the initial conditions.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
      – MisterOH
      Jul 30 at 0:36














    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The general form solution should be (with real eigenvalues) $$vecx(t)=c_1e^lambda_1tveceta_1+c_2e^lambda_2tveceta_2$$ where $lambda$ are the eigenvalues and $veceta$ are the eigenvectors. The arbitrary constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ are there because, as you say, there are an infinite amount of eigenvectors that satisfy the system, which is why we need the initial conditions.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
      – MisterOH
      Jul 30 at 0:36












    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted






    The general form solution should be (with real eigenvalues) $$vecx(t)=c_1e^lambda_1tveceta_1+c_2e^lambda_2tveceta_2$$ where $lambda$ are the eigenvalues and $veceta$ are the eigenvectors. The arbitrary constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ are there because, as you say, there are an infinite amount of eigenvectors that satisfy the system, which is why we need the initial conditions.






    share|cite|improve this answer















    The general form solution should be (with real eigenvalues) $$vecx(t)=c_1e^lambda_1tveceta_1+c_2e^lambda_2tveceta_2$$ where $lambda$ are the eigenvalues and $veceta$ are the eigenvectors. The arbitrary constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ are there because, as you say, there are an infinite amount of eigenvectors that satisfy the system, which is why we need the initial conditions.







    share|cite|improve this answer















    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jul 30 at 0:18


























    answered Jul 30 at 0:10









    高田航

    1,116318




    1,116318











    • I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
      – MisterOH
      Jul 30 at 0:36
















    • I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
      – MisterOH
      Jul 30 at 0:36















    I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:36




    I thought I was getting wrong answers because my eigenvectors didn't match those in my textbook examples, but after simplifying solutions (multiplying through) I see that my solutions are correct. Thanks.
    – MisterOH
    Jul 30 at 0:36










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    In order to find the general solution you only need two linearly independent eigenvectors along with the eigenvalues. The general solution is $$y= C_1 e^lambda _1tV_1 + C_2 e^lambda _2tV_2$$ where the coefficients are found from the initial values.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      In order to find the general solution you only need two linearly independent eigenvectors along with the eigenvalues. The general solution is $$y= C_1 e^lambda _1tV_1 + C_2 e^lambda _2tV_2$$ where the coefficients are found from the initial values.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        In order to find the general solution you only need two linearly independent eigenvectors along with the eigenvalues. The general solution is $$y= C_1 e^lambda _1tV_1 + C_2 e^lambda _2tV_2$$ where the coefficients are found from the initial values.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        In order to find the general solution you only need two linearly independent eigenvectors along with the eigenvalues. The general solution is $$y= C_1 e^lambda _1tV_1 + C_2 e^lambda _2tV_2$$ where the coefficients are found from the initial values.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 30 at 0:12









        Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

        27.3k41851




        27.3k41851












            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon