If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$
My Attempt
If $xin B$ then
$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$
Then
$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$
Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$
We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)
If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?
But can someone help me with an elementary proof.
elementary-set-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$
My Attempt
If $xin B$ then
$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$
Then
$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$
Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$
We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)
If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?
But can someone help me with an elementary proof.
elementary-set-theory
@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02
1
As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note,emptyset
is more common thanphi
)
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$
My Attempt
If $xin B$ then
$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$
Then
$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$
Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$
We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)
If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?
But can someone help me with an elementary proof.
elementary-set-theory
If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$
My Attempt
If $xin B$ then
$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$
Then
$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$
Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$
We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)
If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?
But can someone help me with an elementary proof.
elementary-set-theory
edited Jul 30 at 2:05
Andrés E. Caicedo
63.1k7151235
63.1k7151235
asked Jul 30 at 0:57
Rakesh Bhatt
553112
553112
@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02
1
As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note,emptyset
is more common thanphi
)
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05
add a comment |Â
@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02
1
As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note,emptyset
is more common thanphi
)
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05
@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02
@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02
1
1
As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note,
emptyset
is more common than phi
)â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05
As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note,
emptyset
is more common than phi
)â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If $ain A$ then
(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.
(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.
So no $a$ belongs to $A.$
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If $ain A$ then
(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.
(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.
So no $a$ belongs to $A.$
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If $ain A$ then
(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.
(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.
So no $a$ belongs to $A.$
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
If $ain A$ then
(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.
(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.
So no $a$ belongs to $A.$
If $ain A$ then
(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.
(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.
So no $a$ belongs to $A.$
answered Jul 30 at 2:03
DanielWainfleet
31.4k31542
31.4k31542
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
add a comment |Â
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
â DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866572%2fif-for-some-sets-a-b-we-have-their-symmetric-difference-a-b-cup-b-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02
1
As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note,
emptyset
is more common thanphi
)â JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05