If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$



My Attempt



If $xin B$ then



$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$



Then



$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$



Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$



We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)



If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?



But can someone help me with an elementary proof.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • @Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:02






  • 1




    As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note, emptyset is more common than phi)
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:05















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$



My Attempt



If $xin B$ then



$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$



Then



$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$



Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$



We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)



If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?



But can someone help me with an elementary proof.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • @Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:02






  • 1




    As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note, emptyset is more common than phi)
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:05













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$



My Attempt



If $xin B$ then



$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$



Then



$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$



Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$



We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)



If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?



But can someone help me with an elementary proof.







share|cite|improve this question













If for some sets $A, B$ we have their symmetric difference $(A-B) cup (B-A) =B$. Then does that imply $A=emptyset$



My Attempt



If $xin B$ then



$$ x in (A-B) cup (B-A) $$



Then



$$x in (A-B) $$ or $$ xin (B-A) $$



Note that $x in (A-B)$ is impossible since $xin B$



We must have $$ xin (B-A) $$ such implies that $ x not in A$ hence $A cap B=emptyset$ (Hope I am correct upto this.)



If I further show $ A cup B=B$ then I can conclude that $A= emptyset$, this solution is one of my classmates. But can there be a better proof?



But can someone help me with an elementary proof.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 30 at 2:05









Andrés E. Caicedo

63.1k7151235




63.1k7151235









asked Jul 30 at 0:57









Rakesh Bhatt

553112




553112











  • @Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:02






  • 1




    As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note, emptyset is more common than phi)
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:05

















  • @Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:02






  • 1




    As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note, emptyset is more common than phi)
    – JMoravitz
    Jul 30 at 1:05
















@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
– JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02




@Kaynex the property you mention is exactly the property needing to be proven here. You can't use a result to prove itself, that is circular reasoning.
– JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:02




1




1




As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note, emptyset is more common than phi)
– JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05





As for your attempt at a proof @ Rakesh, it is fine. You showed that $Acap B=emptyset$ well, but rather than showing $A=emptyset$ via showing $Acup B=B$., I would instead approach by contrapositive/contradiction. Supposing that $Acap B=emptyset$ and $A$ is nonempty, then there should be some element $ain A-B$, but then that would have meant ______... (also, as a typesetting note, emptyset is more common than phi)
– JMoravitz
Jul 30 at 1:05











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If $ain A$ then



(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.



(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.



So no $a$ belongs to $A.$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 30 at 18:59











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866572%2fif-for-some-sets-a-b-we-have-their-symmetric-difference-a-b-cup-b-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If $ain A$ then



(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.



(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.



So no $a$ belongs to $A.$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 30 at 18:59















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If $ain A$ then



(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.



(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.



So no $a$ belongs to $A.$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 30 at 18:59













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






If $ain A$ then



(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.



(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.



So no $a$ belongs to $A.$






share|cite|improve this answer













If $ain A$ then



(i). If $;ain B$ then $ain Acap B=Acap (ADelta B)=A$ $B$ so $anot in B, $ a contradiction.



(ii). If $; anot in B$ then $ain A$ $ B subset ADelta B=B$ so $ ain B, $ a contradiction.



So no $a$ belongs to $A.$







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 30 at 2:03









DanielWainfleet

31.4k31542




31.4k31542











  • For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 30 at 18:59

















  • For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 30 at 18:59
















For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59





For a direct proof: Since $A=(A$ $B ) cup (Acap B),$ show first that $Acap B=A$ $B$ and show second that $A backslash B =phi.$ First, $Acap B=A cap (ADelta B)=A$ $ B.$ Second, $A$ $ B= (Abackslash B)cap (ADelta B)=(A backslash B)cap B=phi.$
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 18:59













 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866572%2fif-for-some-sets-a-b-we-have-their-symmetric-difference-a-b-cup-b-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?