Rudin's Proof on L'hospital's Rule

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a little problem understanding a point of Rudin's proof on L'hopital's Rule. Here is the statement of the L'hospital's Rule:



L'hospital's Rule Suppose $f$ and $g$ are real and differentiable in $(a,b)$, and $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, where $-infty leq a<bleq infty$. Suppose $fracf'(x)g'(x)rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$. If $f(x)rightarrow 0$ and $g(x)rightarrow 0$ as $xrightarrow a$, then $fracf(x)g(x) rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$.



Rudin uses the generalized mean value theorem (GMVT):



GMVT If f and g are continuous real functions on [a, b] which are differentiable in (a, b), then there is a point $xin (a,b)$ at which $[f(b)-f(a)]g'(x)=[g(b)-g(a)]f'(x)$.



Here is Rudin's proof on L'hospital's Rule:



Proof: We first consider the case in which $-infty leq A<infty$. Choose a real number $q$ such that $A<q$, and then choose $r$ such that $A<r<q$. Then, there is a point $cin (a,b)$ such that $a<x<c$ implies $fracf'(x)g'(x)<r$. If $a<x<y<c$, then GMVT shows that there is a point $tin (x, y)$ such that $fracf(x)-f(y)g(x)-g(y)=fracf'(t)g'(t)<r$.



For the last line of the above paragraph, I am a little confused on how can we make sure that $g(x)neq g(y)$? Even though $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, we still may have $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x$ and $y$ in $(a,c)$. If $g(x)=g(y)$, we have a fraction over $0$ which can go to infinity, and thus cannot be less than $rin R$.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I have a little problem understanding a point of Rudin's proof on L'hopital's Rule. Here is the statement of the L'hospital's Rule:



    L'hospital's Rule Suppose $f$ and $g$ are real and differentiable in $(a,b)$, and $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, where $-infty leq a<bleq infty$. Suppose $fracf'(x)g'(x)rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$. If $f(x)rightarrow 0$ and $g(x)rightarrow 0$ as $xrightarrow a$, then $fracf(x)g(x) rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$.



    Rudin uses the generalized mean value theorem (GMVT):



    GMVT If f and g are continuous real functions on [a, b] which are differentiable in (a, b), then there is a point $xin (a,b)$ at which $[f(b)-f(a)]g'(x)=[g(b)-g(a)]f'(x)$.



    Here is Rudin's proof on L'hospital's Rule:



    Proof: We first consider the case in which $-infty leq A<infty$. Choose a real number $q$ such that $A<q$, and then choose $r$ such that $A<r<q$. Then, there is a point $cin (a,b)$ such that $a<x<c$ implies $fracf'(x)g'(x)<r$. If $a<x<y<c$, then GMVT shows that there is a point $tin (x, y)$ such that $fracf(x)-f(y)g(x)-g(y)=fracf'(t)g'(t)<r$.



    For the last line of the above paragraph, I am a little confused on how can we make sure that $g(x)neq g(y)$? Even though $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, we still may have $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x$ and $y$ in $(a,c)$. If $g(x)=g(y)$, we have a fraction over $0$ which can go to infinity, and thus cannot be less than $rin R$.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I have a little problem understanding a point of Rudin's proof on L'hopital's Rule. Here is the statement of the L'hospital's Rule:



      L'hospital's Rule Suppose $f$ and $g$ are real and differentiable in $(a,b)$, and $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, where $-infty leq a<bleq infty$. Suppose $fracf'(x)g'(x)rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$. If $f(x)rightarrow 0$ and $g(x)rightarrow 0$ as $xrightarrow a$, then $fracf(x)g(x) rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$.



      Rudin uses the generalized mean value theorem (GMVT):



      GMVT If f and g are continuous real functions on [a, b] which are differentiable in (a, b), then there is a point $xin (a,b)$ at which $[f(b)-f(a)]g'(x)=[g(b)-g(a)]f'(x)$.



      Here is Rudin's proof on L'hospital's Rule:



      Proof: We first consider the case in which $-infty leq A<infty$. Choose a real number $q$ such that $A<q$, and then choose $r$ such that $A<r<q$. Then, there is a point $cin (a,b)$ such that $a<x<c$ implies $fracf'(x)g'(x)<r$. If $a<x<y<c$, then GMVT shows that there is a point $tin (x, y)$ such that $fracf(x)-f(y)g(x)-g(y)=fracf'(t)g'(t)<r$.



      For the last line of the above paragraph, I am a little confused on how can we make sure that $g(x)neq g(y)$? Even though $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, we still may have $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x$ and $y$ in $(a,c)$. If $g(x)=g(y)$, we have a fraction over $0$ which can go to infinity, and thus cannot be less than $rin R$.







      share|cite|improve this question











      I have a little problem understanding a point of Rudin's proof on L'hopital's Rule. Here is the statement of the L'hospital's Rule:



      L'hospital's Rule Suppose $f$ and $g$ are real and differentiable in $(a,b)$, and $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, where $-infty leq a<bleq infty$. Suppose $fracf'(x)g'(x)rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$. If $f(x)rightarrow 0$ and $g(x)rightarrow 0$ as $xrightarrow a$, then $fracf(x)g(x) rightarrow A$ as $xrightarrow a$.



      Rudin uses the generalized mean value theorem (GMVT):



      GMVT If f and g are continuous real functions on [a, b] which are differentiable in (a, b), then there is a point $xin (a,b)$ at which $[f(b)-f(a)]g'(x)=[g(b)-g(a)]f'(x)$.



      Here is Rudin's proof on L'hospital's Rule:



      Proof: We first consider the case in which $-infty leq A<infty$. Choose a real number $q$ such that $A<q$, and then choose $r$ such that $A<r<q$. Then, there is a point $cin (a,b)$ such that $a<x<c$ implies $fracf'(x)g'(x)<r$. If $a<x<y<c$, then GMVT shows that there is a point $tin (x, y)$ such that $fracf(x)-f(y)g(x)-g(y)=fracf'(t)g'(t)<r$.



      For the last line of the above paragraph, I am a little confused on how can we make sure that $g(x)neq g(y)$? Even though $g'(x)neq 0$ for all $xin (a,b)$, we still may have $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x$ and $y$ in $(a,c)$. If $g(x)=g(y)$, we have a fraction over $0$ which can go to infinity, and thus cannot be less than $rin R$.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 30 at 1:03









      James Wang

      876




      876




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          By Rolle's Theorem, if $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x <y$, then, there exists some $c in (x,y)$ such that $g'(c)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866575%2frudins-proof-on-lhospitals-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            By Rolle's Theorem, if $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x <y$, then, there exists some $c in (x,y)$ such that $g'(c)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              By Rolle's Theorem, if $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x <y$, then, there exists some $c in (x,y)$ such that $g'(c)=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                By Rolle's Theorem, if $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x <y$, then, there exists some $c in (x,y)$ such that $g'(c)=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                By Rolle's Theorem, if $g(x)=g(y)$ for some $x <y$, then, there exists some $c in (x,y)$ such that $g'(c)=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 30 at 1:07









                N. S.

                97.7k5105197




                97.7k5105197






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866575%2frudins-proof-on-lhospitals-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon