Filtered Historical Simulation FHS for VAR

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If I wish to run a FHS for VaR model, first I estimate the GARCH model on the historical returns $r_t$, then I obtain the historical innovation time series as $z_t=fracr_tsigma_t$, where $sigma_t$ is the volatility estimated by GARCH.



Setting then $sigma_0$ and $r_0$ as the volatility and log return of the last day of my historical sample, I estimate the GARCH daily variance on day 1 of risk horizon as

$sigma_1^2=gamma+alpha r_0^2+ betasigma_0^2$ and $r_1=z_1 sigma_0^2$,



where $z_1$ is simulated through statistical bootstrap from the previous historical innovation time series.. Then the simulated log return over a
risk horizon of h days is the sum $r_1 +..+r_h$: I do it thousand of times, resembling a distribution on which computing the VaR.



My question are:



  1. If the original historical return $r_t$ present autocorrelation, should I first model them through AR model and THEN run the GARCH model redoing the above mentioned steps?

  2. Is it improper to call the innovation residuals?

  3. If the innovations are not i.i.d, should I model them with AR in mean equation of GARCH?






share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    If I wish to run a FHS for VaR model, first I estimate the GARCH model on the historical returns $r_t$, then I obtain the historical innovation time series as $z_t=fracr_tsigma_t$, where $sigma_t$ is the volatility estimated by GARCH.



    Setting then $sigma_0$ and $r_0$ as the volatility and log return of the last day of my historical sample, I estimate the GARCH daily variance on day 1 of risk horizon as

    $sigma_1^2=gamma+alpha r_0^2+ betasigma_0^2$ and $r_1=z_1 sigma_0^2$,



    where $z_1$ is simulated through statistical bootstrap from the previous historical innovation time series.. Then the simulated log return over a
    risk horizon of h days is the sum $r_1 +..+r_h$: I do it thousand of times, resembling a distribution on which computing the VaR.



    My question are:



    1. If the original historical return $r_t$ present autocorrelation, should I first model them through AR model and THEN run the GARCH model redoing the above mentioned steps?

    2. Is it improper to call the innovation residuals?

    3. If the innovations are not i.i.d, should I model them with AR in mean equation of GARCH?






    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      If I wish to run a FHS for VaR model, first I estimate the GARCH model on the historical returns $r_t$, then I obtain the historical innovation time series as $z_t=fracr_tsigma_t$, where $sigma_t$ is the volatility estimated by GARCH.



      Setting then $sigma_0$ and $r_0$ as the volatility and log return of the last day of my historical sample, I estimate the GARCH daily variance on day 1 of risk horizon as

      $sigma_1^2=gamma+alpha r_0^2+ betasigma_0^2$ and $r_1=z_1 sigma_0^2$,



      where $z_1$ is simulated through statistical bootstrap from the previous historical innovation time series.. Then the simulated log return over a
      risk horizon of h days is the sum $r_1 +..+r_h$: I do it thousand of times, resembling a distribution on which computing the VaR.



      My question are:



      1. If the original historical return $r_t$ present autocorrelation, should I first model them through AR model and THEN run the GARCH model redoing the above mentioned steps?

      2. Is it improper to call the innovation residuals?

      3. If the innovations are not i.i.d, should I model them with AR in mean equation of GARCH?






      share|cite|improve this question











      If I wish to run a FHS for VaR model, first I estimate the GARCH model on the historical returns $r_t$, then I obtain the historical innovation time series as $z_t=fracr_tsigma_t$, where $sigma_t$ is the volatility estimated by GARCH.



      Setting then $sigma_0$ and $r_0$ as the volatility and log return of the last day of my historical sample, I estimate the GARCH daily variance on day 1 of risk horizon as

      $sigma_1^2=gamma+alpha r_0^2+ betasigma_0^2$ and $r_1=z_1 sigma_0^2$,



      where $z_1$ is simulated through statistical bootstrap from the previous historical innovation time series.. Then the simulated log return over a
      risk horizon of h days is the sum $r_1 +..+r_h$: I do it thousand of times, resembling a distribution on which computing the VaR.



      My question are:



      1. If the original historical return $r_t$ present autocorrelation, should I first model them through AR model and THEN run the GARCH model redoing the above mentioned steps?

      2. Is it improper to call the innovation residuals?

      3. If the innovations are not i.i.d, should I model them with AR in mean equation of GARCH?








      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Aug 2 at 14:13









      Francesco Lorenzo Flamini

      83




      83

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870111%2ffiltered-historical-simulation-fhs-for-var%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870111%2ffiltered-historical-simulation-fhs-for-var%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?