Find the limiting probability

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1













Let $U_n$ be a sequence of i.i.d Uniform$(0,1)$ random variables and $a_k$ be a sequence of i.i.d random variables such that, $P(a_k = pm1) = frac12$ and are independent of the $U_n$. Define the quantities,



$$X_n = sumlimits_k=1^nU_ka_k, ;;;; Y_n = sumlimits_k=1^n(U_k^2 - 1/2)a_k$$



Find the limit, $limlimits_nrightarrowinftyPleft(|X_n| > Y_nsqrtfrac207right)$.




We can easily calculate that $$E[U_ka_k] = 0, ; E[U_k^2] = frac13$$ and similarly, $$E[(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = 0, ; E[(U_k^2-1/2)^2] = frac760$$ So by the Central Limit Theorem, we get,



$$ frac1sqrtnX_n xrightarrowD N(0,1/3), ;;;; frac1sqrtnY_n xrightarrowD N(0,7/60)$$



Ideally, I can use something like the Continuous Mapping Theorem to deduce the limiting distribution of $dfracY_n$, but the question makes no additional assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n, Y_n)$. Is there another approach I can take from here?



EDIT: I went ahead and calculated the covariance of $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$,



$$ E[U_ka_k(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = E[U_k(U_k^2-1/2)] =int_0^1(u^3-1/2u)du = 0$$



since $a_k^2 = 1$ with probability $1$. Now we can apply the multivariate CLT like @LandonCarter says.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    How could there be any assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n,Y_n)$? Can't you calculate it? Every piece of information is given
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Are the $U_n$ independent of the $a_k$?
    – angryavian
    yesterday










  • Yes sorry I forgot to add that assumption. The question has been edited.
    – Flowsnake
    yesterday










  • @mathworker21 Sorry I just realized that now. One can easily calculate the covariance between the $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ to be $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1













Let $U_n$ be a sequence of i.i.d Uniform$(0,1)$ random variables and $a_k$ be a sequence of i.i.d random variables such that, $P(a_k = pm1) = frac12$ and are independent of the $U_n$. Define the quantities,



$$X_n = sumlimits_k=1^nU_ka_k, ;;;; Y_n = sumlimits_k=1^n(U_k^2 - 1/2)a_k$$



Find the limit, $limlimits_nrightarrowinftyPleft(|X_n| > Y_nsqrtfrac207right)$.




We can easily calculate that $$E[U_ka_k] = 0, ; E[U_k^2] = frac13$$ and similarly, $$E[(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = 0, ; E[(U_k^2-1/2)^2] = frac760$$ So by the Central Limit Theorem, we get,



$$ frac1sqrtnX_n xrightarrowD N(0,1/3), ;;;; frac1sqrtnY_n xrightarrowD N(0,7/60)$$



Ideally, I can use something like the Continuous Mapping Theorem to deduce the limiting distribution of $dfracY_n$, but the question makes no additional assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n, Y_n)$. Is there another approach I can take from here?



EDIT: I went ahead and calculated the covariance of $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$,



$$ E[U_ka_k(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = E[U_k(U_k^2-1/2)] =int_0^1(u^3-1/2u)du = 0$$



since $a_k^2 = 1$ with probability $1$. Now we can apply the multivariate CLT like @LandonCarter says.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    How could there be any assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n,Y_n)$? Can't you calculate it? Every piece of information is given
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Are the $U_n$ independent of the $a_k$?
    – angryavian
    yesterday










  • Yes sorry I forgot to add that assumption. The question has been edited.
    – Flowsnake
    yesterday










  • @mathworker21 Sorry I just realized that now. One can easily calculate the covariance between the $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ to be $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1






Let $U_n$ be a sequence of i.i.d Uniform$(0,1)$ random variables and $a_k$ be a sequence of i.i.d random variables such that, $P(a_k = pm1) = frac12$ and are independent of the $U_n$. Define the quantities,



$$X_n = sumlimits_k=1^nU_ka_k, ;;;; Y_n = sumlimits_k=1^n(U_k^2 - 1/2)a_k$$



Find the limit, $limlimits_nrightarrowinftyPleft(|X_n| > Y_nsqrtfrac207right)$.




We can easily calculate that $$E[U_ka_k] = 0, ; E[U_k^2] = frac13$$ and similarly, $$E[(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = 0, ; E[(U_k^2-1/2)^2] = frac760$$ So by the Central Limit Theorem, we get,



$$ frac1sqrtnX_n xrightarrowD N(0,1/3), ;;;; frac1sqrtnY_n xrightarrowD N(0,7/60)$$



Ideally, I can use something like the Continuous Mapping Theorem to deduce the limiting distribution of $dfracY_n$, but the question makes no additional assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n, Y_n)$. Is there another approach I can take from here?



EDIT: I went ahead and calculated the covariance of $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$,



$$ E[U_ka_k(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = E[U_k(U_k^2-1/2)] =int_0^1(u^3-1/2u)du = 0$$



since $a_k^2 = 1$ with probability $1$. Now we can apply the multivariate CLT like @LandonCarter says.







share|cite|improve this question














Let $U_n$ be a sequence of i.i.d Uniform$(0,1)$ random variables and $a_k$ be a sequence of i.i.d random variables such that, $P(a_k = pm1) = frac12$ and are independent of the $U_n$. Define the quantities,



$$X_n = sumlimits_k=1^nU_ka_k, ;;;; Y_n = sumlimits_k=1^n(U_k^2 - 1/2)a_k$$



Find the limit, $limlimits_nrightarrowinftyPleft(|X_n| > Y_nsqrtfrac207right)$.




We can easily calculate that $$E[U_ka_k] = 0, ; E[U_k^2] = frac13$$ and similarly, $$E[(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = 0, ; E[(U_k^2-1/2)^2] = frac760$$ So by the Central Limit Theorem, we get,



$$ frac1sqrtnX_n xrightarrowD N(0,1/3), ;;;; frac1sqrtnY_n xrightarrowD N(0,7/60)$$



Ideally, I can use something like the Continuous Mapping Theorem to deduce the limiting distribution of $dfracY_n$, but the question makes no additional assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n, Y_n)$. Is there another approach I can take from here?



EDIT: I went ahead and calculated the covariance of $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$,



$$ E[U_ka_k(U_k^2-1/2)a_k] = E[U_k(U_k^2-1/2)] =int_0^1(u^3-1/2u)du = 0$$



since $a_k^2 = 1$ with probability $1$. Now we can apply the multivariate CLT like @LandonCarter says.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago
























asked yesterday









Flowsnake

1,4581217




1,4581217







  • 1




    How could there be any assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n,Y_n)$? Can't you calculate it? Every piece of information is given
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Are the $U_n$ independent of the $a_k$?
    – angryavian
    yesterday










  • Yes sorry I forgot to add that assumption. The question has been edited.
    – Flowsnake
    yesterday










  • @mathworker21 Sorry I just realized that now. One can easily calculate the covariance between the $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ to be $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago












  • 1




    How could there be any assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n,Y_n)$? Can't you calculate it? Every piece of information is given
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Are the $U_n$ independent of the $a_k$?
    – angryavian
    yesterday










  • Yes sorry I forgot to add that assumption. The question has been edited.
    – Flowsnake
    yesterday










  • @mathworker21 Sorry I just realized that now. One can easily calculate the covariance between the $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ to be $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago







1




1




How could there be any assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n,Y_n)$? Can't you calculate it? Every piece of information is given
– mathworker21
yesterday




How could there be any assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X_n,Y_n)$? Can't you calculate it? Every piece of information is given
– mathworker21
yesterday












Are the $U_n$ independent of the $a_k$?
– angryavian
yesterday




Are the $U_n$ independent of the $a_k$?
– angryavian
yesterday












Yes sorry I forgot to add that assumption. The question has been edited.
– Flowsnake
yesterday




Yes sorry I forgot to add that assumption. The question has been edited.
– Flowsnake
yesterday












@mathworker21 Sorry I just realized that now. One can easily calculate the covariance between the $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ to be $0$. Thank you.
– Flowsnake
18 hours ago




@mathworker21 Sorry I just realized that now. One can easily calculate the covariance between the $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ to be $0$. Thank you.
– Flowsnake
18 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










By multivariate CLT, $$(X_n/sqrtn, Y_n/sqrtn)stackreldtoN((0,0),diag(1/3,7/60))$$so in the limit $X_n/sqrtn$ and $Y_n/sqrtn$ become jointly independent Normals.



So $P[|X_n|>Y_nsqrt20/7]=P[dfracY_n/sqrtn<sqrt7/20]to P[N_1/|N_2|<sqrt7/20]$ as $ntoinfty$ where $N_1sim N(0,7/60)$ and $N_2sim N(0,1/3)$ independent. Note $N_1=sqrt7/60Z_1$ and $N_2=sqrt1/3Z_2$ where $Z_1,Z_2sim N(0,1)$ iid.



So the limiting probability (after some simplification) is $P[Z_1/|Z_2|<1]$. Maybe you can simplify this using the fact that $Z_1/Z_2$ is $Cauchy (0,1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
    – Landon Carter
    17 hours ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872642%2ffind-the-limiting-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










By multivariate CLT, $$(X_n/sqrtn, Y_n/sqrtn)stackreldtoN((0,0),diag(1/3,7/60))$$so in the limit $X_n/sqrtn$ and $Y_n/sqrtn$ become jointly independent Normals.



So $P[|X_n|>Y_nsqrt20/7]=P[dfracY_n/sqrtn<sqrt7/20]to P[N_1/|N_2|<sqrt7/20]$ as $ntoinfty$ where $N_1sim N(0,7/60)$ and $N_2sim N(0,1/3)$ independent. Note $N_1=sqrt7/60Z_1$ and $N_2=sqrt1/3Z_2$ where $Z_1,Z_2sim N(0,1)$ iid.



So the limiting probability (after some simplification) is $P[Z_1/|Z_2|<1]$. Maybe you can simplify this using the fact that $Z_1/Z_2$ is $Cauchy (0,1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
    – Landon Carter
    17 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










By multivariate CLT, $$(X_n/sqrtn, Y_n/sqrtn)stackreldtoN((0,0),diag(1/3,7/60))$$so in the limit $X_n/sqrtn$ and $Y_n/sqrtn$ become jointly independent Normals.



So $P[|X_n|>Y_nsqrt20/7]=P[dfracY_n/sqrtn<sqrt7/20]to P[N_1/|N_2|<sqrt7/20]$ as $ntoinfty$ where $N_1sim N(0,7/60)$ and $N_2sim N(0,1/3)$ independent. Note $N_1=sqrt7/60Z_1$ and $N_2=sqrt1/3Z_2$ where $Z_1,Z_2sim N(0,1)$ iid.



So the limiting probability (after some simplification) is $P[Z_1/|Z_2|<1]$. Maybe you can simplify this using the fact that $Z_1/Z_2$ is $Cauchy (0,1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
    – Landon Carter
    17 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






By multivariate CLT, $$(X_n/sqrtn, Y_n/sqrtn)stackreldtoN((0,0),diag(1/3,7/60))$$so in the limit $X_n/sqrtn$ and $Y_n/sqrtn$ become jointly independent Normals.



So $P[|X_n|>Y_nsqrt20/7]=P[dfracY_n/sqrtn<sqrt7/20]to P[N_1/|N_2|<sqrt7/20]$ as $ntoinfty$ where $N_1sim N(0,7/60)$ and $N_2sim N(0,1/3)$ independent. Note $N_1=sqrt7/60Z_1$ and $N_2=sqrt1/3Z_2$ where $Z_1,Z_2sim N(0,1)$ iid.



So the limiting probability (after some simplification) is $P[Z_1/|Z_2|<1]$. Maybe you can simplify this using the fact that $Z_1/Z_2$ is $Cauchy (0,1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer















By multivariate CLT, $$(X_n/sqrtn, Y_n/sqrtn)stackreldtoN((0,0),diag(1/3,7/60))$$so in the limit $X_n/sqrtn$ and $Y_n/sqrtn$ become jointly independent Normals.



So $P[|X_n|>Y_nsqrt20/7]=P[dfracY_n/sqrtn<sqrt7/20]to P[N_1/|N_2|<sqrt7/20]$ as $ntoinfty$ where $N_1sim N(0,7/60)$ and $N_2sim N(0,1/3)$ independent. Note $N_1=sqrt7/60Z_1$ and $N_2=sqrt1/3Z_2$ where $Z_1,Z_2sim N(0,1)$ iid.



So the limiting probability (after some simplification) is $P[Z_1/|Z_2|<1]$. Maybe you can simplify this using the fact that $Z_1/Z_2$ is $Cauchy (0,1)$.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited yesterday


























answered yesterday









Landon Carter

7,13611540




7,13611540











  • Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
    – Landon Carter
    17 hours ago
















  • Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
    – Flowsnake
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
    – Landon Carter
    17 hours ago















Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
– Flowsnake
18 hours ago




Ah, I was a bit confused as to why the limiting joint distribution was independent. Then I calculated that the covariance between $U_ka_k$ and $(U_k^2-1/2)a_k$ is $0$. Thank you.
– Flowsnake
18 hours ago




1




1




By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
– Landon Carter
17 hours ago




By the way note that you can indeed simplify this as follows. Observe $T=Z_1/|Z_2|$ is symmetrical about 0 so the final limiting probability is $P[T<1]=1/2+P[0<T<1]=0.5(1+P(|T|<1))$ and now use that T is standard Cauchy.
– Landon Carter
17 hours ago












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872642%2ffind-the-limiting-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?