Finding matrix whose null space is spanned by two given vectors
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $ K = SP (-5,8,14,0),(-1,4,2,4) $
So based on the solutions given here and here it should be same as finding orthogonal vectors so $ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-5,8,14,0) = 0 \ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-1,4,2,4) = 0 $
and then I find those four vectors $ (frac103,0,1,0),(-frac83,0,0,1),(0,frac13,1,0),(0,-frac53,0,1) $
setting those vectors in a matrix isn't the solution though... Im not sure what am I missing?
linear-algebra orthogonality
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $ K = SP (-5,8,14,0),(-1,4,2,4) $
So based on the solutions given here and here it should be same as finding orthogonal vectors so $ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-5,8,14,0) = 0 \ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-1,4,2,4) = 0 $
and then I find those four vectors $ (frac103,0,1,0),(-frac83,0,0,1),(0,frac13,1,0),(0,-frac53,0,1) $
setting those vectors in a matrix isn't the solution though... Im not sure what am I missing?
linear-algebra orthogonality
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $ K = SP (-5,8,14,0),(-1,4,2,4) $
So based on the solutions given here and here it should be same as finding orthogonal vectors so $ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-5,8,14,0) = 0 \ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-1,4,2,4) = 0 $
and then I find those four vectors $ (frac103,0,1,0),(-frac83,0,0,1),(0,frac13,1,0),(0,-frac53,0,1) $
setting those vectors in a matrix isn't the solution though... Im not sure what am I missing?
linear-algebra orthogonality
Let $ K = SP (-5,8,14,0),(-1,4,2,4) $
So based on the solutions given here and here it should be same as finding orthogonal vectors so $ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-5,8,14,0) = 0 \ (x,y,z,t) cdot (-1,4,2,4) = 0 $
and then I find those four vectors $ (frac103,0,1,0),(-frac83,0,0,1),(0,frac13,1,0),(0,-frac53,0,1) $
setting those vectors in a matrix isn't the solution though... Im not sure what am I missing?
linear-algebra orthogonality
edited Jul 22 at 14:01
Rodrigo de Azevedo
12.6k41751
12.6k41751
asked Jul 22 at 10:58
bm1125
1216
1216
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
A simple way to do this: use elementary column operations to transform the matrix $$beginbmatrix -5 & -1 \ 8 & 4\ 14 & 2\ 0&4 endbmatrix$$ into 'reverse' echelon form: $$beginbmatrix-frac514 & -frac114\frac47 & frac57\1&0\0&1endbmatrix.$$ Notice that this matrix is in the form $$beginbmatrix -F \ I endbmatrix,$$ and so if we multiply it by $$beginbmatrix I & F \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix,$$ (where the 0's in this case can be any amount of rows with zero entries) the result will be the zero matrix, which is what we want. So depending on how many rows we want in our resulting matrix we can select as many zero rows at the bottom as we want. It seems as if you were aiming for a $4 times 4$ matrix so let's add two rows of zero...so therefore $$beginbmatrix 1 & 0 & frac514 & frac114\0&1&-frac47 & -frac57\0&0&0&0\0&0&0&0 endbmatrix$$ would work. Notics that this matrix is in row reduced echelon form, and so you can left multiply it by any elementary matrix to get other matrices that would have the same null space. The theory for the above, you can find in the following article: Row reduction of a matrix and $A=CaB$ by Steven L Lee and Gilbert Strang.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
A simple way to do this: use elementary column operations to transform the matrix $$beginbmatrix -5 & -1 \ 8 & 4\ 14 & 2\ 0&4 endbmatrix$$ into 'reverse' echelon form: $$beginbmatrix-frac514 & -frac114\frac47 & frac57\1&0\0&1endbmatrix.$$ Notice that this matrix is in the form $$beginbmatrix -F \ I endbmatrix,$$ and so if we multiply it by $$beginbmatrix I & F \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix,$$ (where the 0's in this case can be any amount of rows with zero entries) the result will be the zero matrix, which is what we want. So depending on how many rows we want in our resulting matrix we can select as many zero rows at the bottom as we want. It seems as if you were aiming for a $4 times 4$ matrix so let's add two rows of zero...so therefore $$beginbmatrix 1 & 0 & frac514 & frac114\0&1&-frac47 & -frac57\0&0&0&0\0&0&0&0 endbmatrix$$ would work. Notics that this matrix is in row reduced echelon form, and so you can left multiply it by any elementary matrix to get other matrices that would have the same null space. The theory for the above, you can find in the following article: Row reduction of a matrix and $A=CaB$ by Steven L Lee and Gilbert Strang.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
A simple way to do this: use elementary column operations to transform the matrix $$beginbmatrix -5 & -1 \ 8 & 4\ 14 & 2\ 0&4 endbmatrix$$ into 'reverse' echelon form: $$beginbmatrix-frac514 & -frac114\frac47 & frac57\1&0\0&1endbmatrix.$$ Notice that this matrix is in the form $$beginbmatrix -F \ I endbmatrix,$$ and so if we multiply it by $$beginbmatrix I & F \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix,$$ (where the 0's in this case can be any amount of rows with zero entries) the result will be the zero matrix, which is what we want. So depending on how many rows we want in our resulting matrix we can select as many zero rows at the bottom as we want. It seems as if you were aiming for a $4 times 4$ matrix so let's add two rows of zero...so therefore $$beginbmatrix 1 & 0 & frac514 & frac114\0&1&-frac47 & -frac57\0&0&0&0\0&0&0&0 endbmatrix$$ would work. Notics that this matrix is in row reduced echelon form, and so you can left multiply it by any elementary matrix to get other matrices that would have the same null space. The theory for the above, you can find in the following article: Row reduction of a matrix and $A=CaB$ by Steven L Lee and Gilbert Strang.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
A simple way to do this: use elementary column operations to transform the matrix $$beginbmatrix -5 & -1 \ 8 & 4\ 14 & 2\ 0&4 endbmatrix$$ into 'reverse' echelon form: $$beginbmatrix-frac514 & -frac114\frac47 & frac57\1&0\0&1endbmatrix.$$ Notice that this matrix is in the form $$beginbmatrix -F \ I endbmatrix,$$ and so if we multiply it by $$beginbmatrix I & F \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix,$$ (where the 0's in this case can be any amount of rows with zero entries) the result will be the zero matrix, which is what we want. So depending on how many rows we want in our resulting matrix we can select as many zero rows at the bottom as we want. It seems as if you were aiming for a $4 times 4$ matrix so let's add two rows of zero...so therefore $$beginbmatrix 1 & 0 & frac514 & frac114\0&1&-frac47 & -frac57\0&0&0&0\0&0&0&0 endbmatrix$$ would work. Notics that this matrix is in row reduced echelon form, and so you can left multiply it by any elementary matrix to get other matrices that would have the same null space. The theory for the above, you can find in the following article: Row reduction of a matrix and $A=CaB$ by Steven L Lee and Gilbert Strang.
A simple way to do this: use elementary column operations to transform the matrix $$beginbmatrix -5 & -1 \ 8 & 4\ 14 & 2\ 0&4 endbmatrix$$ into 'reverse' echelon form: $$beginbmatrix-frac514 & -frac114\frac47 & frac57\1&0\0&1endbmatrix.$$ Notice that this matrix is in the form $$beginbmatrix -F \ I endbmatrix,$$ and so if we multiply it by $$beginbmatrix I & F \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix,$$ (where the 0's in this case can be any amount of rows with zero entries) the result will be the zero matrix, which is what we want. So depending on how many rows we want in our resulting matrix we can select as many zero rows at the bottom as we want. It seems as if you were aiming for a $4 times 4$ matrix so let's add two rows of zero...so therefore $$beginbmatrix 1 & 0 & frac514 & frac114\0&1&-frac47 & -frac57\0&0&0&0\0&0&0&0 endbmatrix$$ would work. Notics that this matrix is in row reduced echelon form, and so you can left multiply it by any elementary matrix to get other matrices that would have the same null space. The theory for the above, you can find in the following article: Row reduction of a matrix and $A=CaB$ by Steven L Lee and Gilbert Strang.
answered Jul 22 at 13:16
Christiaan Hattingh
3,782921
3,782921
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859289%2ffinding-matrix-whose-null-space-is-spanned-by-two-given-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password