$f(x)=max_0le yle 1fracx+y+1$ [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












Let $f:[0,1]tomathbb R$ be defined as
$$f(x)=maxleftfracx-yx+y+1: 0le yle 1righttext for 0le xle 1$$
Then which of the following statements is correct?



  1. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[1/2,1]$

  2. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[1/2,1]$

  3. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$

  4. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$






share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jul 24 at 13:23


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















    up vote
    -1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $f:[0,1]tomathbb R$ be defined as
    $$f(x)=maxleftfracx-yx+y+1: 0le yle 1righttext for 0le xle 1$$
    Then which of the following statements is correct?



    1. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[1/2,1]$

    2. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[1/2,1]$

    3. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$

    4. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$






    share|cite|improve this question













    closed as off-topic by uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jul 24 at 13:23


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister
    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $f:[0,1]tomathbb R$ be defined as
      $$f(x)=maxleftfracx-yx+y+1: 0le yle 1righttext for 0le xle 1$$
      Then which of the following statements is correct?



      1. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[1/2,1]$

      2. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[1/2,1]$

      3. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$

      4. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$






      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $f:[0,1]tomathbb R$ be defined as
      $$f(x)=maxleftfracx-yx+y+1: 0le yle 1righttext for 0le xle 1$$
      Then which of the following statements is correct?



      1. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[1/2,1]$

      2. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,1/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[1/2,1]$

      3. $f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly decreasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$

      4. $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,(sqrt3-1)/2]$ and strictly increasing on $[(sqrt3-1)/2,1]$








      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 21 at 10:07









      Lorenzo B.

      1,5402418




      1,5402418









      asked Jul 21 at 5:02









      Alphanerd

      6317




      6317




      closed as off-topic by uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jul 24 at 13:23


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      closed as off-topic by uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jul 24 at 13:23


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – uniquesolution, Martin R, Tyrone, amWhy, Adrian Keister
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          This problem requires more work than you expected!



          Extremal problems with parameters are tricky, since not only the value of the maximum, but also the "morphology of the extremal configuration" depends on the parameter. In the case at hand I propose to introduce a function $g$ of two variables as follows:
          $$g_x(y):=left{eqalignx-yover x+y+1qquad&(0leq yleq x)cr
          y-xover x+y+1qquad&(xleq yleq 1)crright.$$
          Now consider $xin[0,1]$ as fixed. Then analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[0,x]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$, and similarly analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[x,1]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$. Now you have a complete overview over the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ for this particular $x$. There will be a maximum value, and this is your $f(x)$ for that particular $x$.



          Note that $ymapsto g_x(y)$ is monotone on the subintervals $[0,x]$ and $[x,1]$. It follows that
          $$f(x)=maxbiglg_x(0), g_x(x),g_x(1)bigr=maxleftxover x+1, 0,1-xover x+2right .$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
            – Alphanerd
            Jul 21 at 10:26

















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          This problem requires more work than you expected!



          Extremal problems with parameters are tricky, since not only the value of the maximum, but also the "morphology of the extremal configuration" depends on the parameter. In the case at hand I propose to introduce a function $g$ of two variables as follows:
          $$g_x(y):=left{eqalignx-yover x+y+1qquad&(0leq yleq x)cr
          y-xover x+y+1qquad&(xleq yleq 1)crright.$$
          Now consider $xin[0,1]$ as fixed. Then analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[0,x]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$, and similarly analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[x,1]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$. Now you have a complete overview over the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ for this particular $x$. There will be a maximum value, and this is your $f(x)$ for that particular $x$.



          Note that $ymapsto g_x(y)$ is monotone on the subintervals $[0,x]$ and $[x,1]$. It follows that
          $$f(x)=maxbiglg_x(0), g_x(x),g_x(1)bigr=maxleftxover x+1, 0,1-xover x+2right .$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
            – Alphanerd
            Jul 21 at 10:26














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          This problem requires more work than you expected!



          Extremal problems with parameters are tricky, since not only the value of the maximum, but also the "morphology of the extremal configuration" depends on the parameter. In the case at hand I propose to introduce a function $g$ of two variables as follows:
          $$g_x(y):=left{eqalignx-yover x+y+1qquad&(0leq yleq x)cr
          y-xover x+y+1qquad&(xleq yleq 1)crright.$$
          Now consider $xin[0,1]$ as fixed. Then analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[0,x]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$, and similarly analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[x,1]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$. Now you have a complete overview over the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ for this particular $x$. There will be a maximum value, and this is your $f(x)$ for that particular $x$.



          Note that $ymapsto g_x(y)$ is monotone on the subintervals $[0,x]$ and $[x,1]$. It follows that
          $$f(x)=maxbiglg_x(0), g_x(x),g_x(1)bigr=maxleftxover x+1, 0,1-xover x+2right .$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
            – Alphanerd
            Jul 21 at 10:26












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          This problem requires more work than you expected!



          Extremal problems with parameters are tricky, since not only the value of the maximum, but also the "morphology of the extremal configuration" depends on the parameter. In the case at hand I propose to introduce a function $g$ of two variables as follows:
          $$g_x(y):=left{eqalignx-yover x+y+1qquad&(0leq yleq x)cr
          y-xover x+y+1qquad&(xleq yleq 1)crright.$$
          Now consider $xin[0,1]$ as fixed. Then analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[0,x]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$, and similarly analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[x,1]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$. Now you have a complete overview over the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ for this particular $x$. There will be a maximum value, and this is your $f(x)$ for that particular $x$.



          Note that $ymapsto g_x(y)$ is monotone on the subintervals $[0,x]$ and $[x,1]$. It follows that
          $$f(x)=maxbiglg_x(0), g_x(x),g_x(1)bigr=maxleftxover x+1, 0,1-xover x+2right .$$






          share|cite|improve this answer















          This problem requires more work than you expected!



          Extremal problems with parameters are tricky, since not only the value of the maximum, but also the "morphology of the extremal configuration" depends on the parameter. In the case at hand I propose to introduce a function $g$ of two variables as follows:
          $$g_x(y):=left{eqalignx-yover x+y+1qquad&(0leq yleq x)cr
          y-xover x+y+1qquad&(xleq yleq 1)crright.$$
          Now consider $xin[0,1]$ as fixed. Then analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[0,x]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$, and similarly analyze the graph of the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ in the $y$-interval $[x,1]$, where $g_x(y)=x-yover x+y+1$. Now you have a complete overview over the function $ymapsto g_x(y)$ for this particular $x$. There will be a maximum value, and this is your $f(x)$ for that particular $x$.



          Note that $ymapsto g_x(y)$ is monotone on the subintervals $[0,x]$ and $[x,1]$. It follows that
          $$f(x)=maxbiglg_x(0), g_x(x),g_x(1)bigr=maxleftxover x+1, 0,1-xover x+2right .$$







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 21 at 11:57


























          answered Jul 21 at 10:03









          Christian Blatter

          163k7107306




          163k7107306











          • This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
            – Alphanerd
            Jul 21 at 10:26
















          • This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
            – Alphanerd
            Jul 21 at 10:26















          This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
          – Alphanerd
          Jul 21 at 10:26




          This problem appeared in a test conducted by ISI(Indian Statistical Institute) which is given by high school students. I am a bit surprised that they gave such a complex question and looking at your solution , the question seems to be a bit out of scope . Anyways , thank you for your solution . I will try my best to grasp it .
          – Alphanerd
          Jul 21 at 10:26


          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?