How many colors are needed to color an infinite grid so that no sqaure have the same color in all 4 vertexes? [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1













This question already has an answer here:



  • Monochromatic squares in a colored plane

    2 answers



Suppose on a 2 dimension infinite grid, all nodes, or equivalently, all $(p,q)$ points, where $p, q in mathbb Z$, need to be painted with a color.



Is there a way that, given enough kinds of paiting colors, e.g. $n$, all sqaures will have at least 2 colors? i.e we can avoid to have any square that all its 4 vertexes are painted in the same color?



Or... is this impossible?







share|cite|improve this question













marked as duplicate by Mostafa Ayaz, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel, Taroccoesbrocco, max_zorn Jul 22 at 5:07


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • Do you mean all unit squares or all squares of any size?
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 21 at 14:17










  • @RossMillikan of any size
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • Grid-aligned squares, or are angled squares also allowed (much more complicated)?
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:26










  • @Joffan I... I was just thinking about some puzzle to amuse myself... and found it's too far beyond my reach. Maybe you can choose either way?
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:28







  • 1




    relevant paper: cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/COURSES/250/S15/monosq.pdf
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 15:30














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1













This question already has an answer here:



  • Monochromatic squares in a colored plane

    2 answers



Suppose on a 2 dimension infinite grid, all nodes, or equivalently, all $(p,q)$ points, where $p, q in mathbb Z$, need to be painted with a color.



Is there a way that, given enough kinds of paiting colors, e.g. $n$, all sqaures will have at least 2 colors? i.e we can avoid to have any square that all its 4 vertexes are painted in the same color?



Or... is this impossible?







share|cite|improve this question













marked as duplicate by Mostafa Ayaz, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel, Taroccoesbrocco, max_zorn Jul 22 at 5:07


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • Do you mean all unit squares or all squares of any size?
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 21 at 14:17










  • @RossMillikan of any size
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • Grid-aligned squares, or are angled squares also allowed (much more complicated)?
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:26










  • @Joffan I... I was just thinking about some puzzle to amuse myself... and found it's too far beyond my reach. Maybe you can choose either way?
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:28







  • 1




    relevant paper: cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/COURSES/250/S15/monosq.pdf
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 15:30












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1






This question already has an answer here:



  • Monochromatic squares in a colored plane

    2 answers



Suppose on a 2 dimension infinite grid, all nodes, or equivalently, all $(p,q)$ points, where $p, q in mathbb Z$, need to be painted with a color.



Is there a way that, given enough kinds of paiting colors, e.g. $n$, all sqaures will have at least 2 colors? i.e we can avoid to have any square that all its 4 vertexes are painted in the same color?



Or... is this impossible?







share|cite|improve this question














This question already has an answer here:



  • Monochromatic squares in a colored plane

    2 answers



Suppose on a 2 dimension infinite grid, all nodes, or equivalently, all $(p,q)$ points, where $p, q in mathbb Z$, need to be painted with a color.



Is there a way that, given enough kinds of paiting colors, e.g. $n$, all sqaures will have at least 2 colors? i.e we can avoid to have any square that all its 4 vertexes are painted in the same color?



Or... is this impossible?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Monochromatic squares in a colored plane

    2 answers









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 21 at 14:19









Mike Pierce

11k93574




11k93574









asked Jul 21 at 14:09









athos

70411236




70411236




marked as duplicate by Mostafa Ayaz, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel, Taroccoesbrocco, max_zorn Jul 22 at 5:07


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Mostafa Ayaz, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel, Taroccoesbrocco, max_zorn Jul 22 at 5:07


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • Do you mean all unit squares or all squares of any size?
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 21 at 14:17










  • @RossMillikan of any size
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • Grid-aligned squares, or are angled squares also allowed (much more complicated)?
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:26










  • @Joffan I... I was just thinking about some puzzle to amuse myself... and found it's too far beyond my reach. Maybe you can choose either way?
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:28







  • 1




    relevant paper: cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/COURSES/250/S15/monosq.pdf
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 15:30
















  • Do you mean all unit squares or all squares of any size?
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 21 at 14:17










  • @RossMillikan of any size
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • Grid-aligned squares, or are angled squares also allowed (much more complicated)?
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:26










  • @Joffan I... I was just thinking about some puzzle to amuse myself... and found it's too far beyond my reach. Maybe you can choose either way?
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:28







  • 1




    relevant paper: cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/COURSES/250/S15/monosq.pdf
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 15:30















Do you mean all unit squares or all squares of any size?
– Ross Millikan
Jul 21 at 14:17




Do you mean all unit squares or all squares of any size?
– Ross Millikan
Jul 21 at 14:17












@RossMillikan of any size
– athos
Jul 21 at 14:18




@RossMillikan of any size
– athos
Jul 21 at 14:18












Grid-aligned squares, or are angled squares also allowed (much more complicated)?
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 14:26




Grid-aligned squares, or are angled squares also allowed (much more complicated)?
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 14:26












@Joffan I... I was just thinking about some puzzle to amuse myself... and found it's too far beyond my reach. Maybe you can choose either way?
– athos
Jul 21 at 14:28





@Joffan I... I was just thinking about some puzzle to amuse myself... and found it's too far beyond my reach. Maybe you can choose either way?
– athos
Jul 21 at 14:28





1




1




relevant paper: cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/COURSES/250/S15/monosq.pdf
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 15:30




relevant paper: cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/COURSES/250/S15/monosq.pdf
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 15:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Solution for rectangles (now removed from question): In an infinite grid, you require an infinite number of colours. See the closing note in Every point of a grid is colored in blue, red or green. How to prove there is a monochromatic rectangle? giving the size of a grid required to produce such a rectangle for $n$ colours:





For $n$ colours, using the same approach, we would adopt a grid of $(n+1)$ rows and then require $nn+1 choose 2+1 = n(n+1)n/2 +1 = (n^3+n^2)/2 + 1$ columns to find a rectangle with same-coloured corners.






Work on mono squares:



While the numbers are too big for comfortable imagination, these notes from Gasarch (link) gives a direction to infer the existence of a monochrome grid-aligned square in a sufficiently large 2- or 3-colored grid.




One of the key parts of the proof in that paper requires a rather large grid to guarantee the existence of a mono-colored $L$ (three points of the same colour in the form of an $L$: $(x,y),$ $(x+d,y),$ $(x,y+d)$). I wanted to improve on this, at least for two colours and I think the process can apply for more:



Consider the top left to bottom right diagonal of a two-coloured $ntimes n$ grid.



If there are three regularly spaced points of the same colour on this diagonal, there is a mono $L$ in the grid. Proof: Consider the points that would form an $L$ with each possible pairing of these three points. If one of these is the relevant colour, that is a mono $L$. If all three are the opposite colour, they form a mono $L$ in that opposite colour.



How long a diagonal do we need to force three regular-spaced points of the same colour? Experimentally the answer is $9$, forced from the following initial patterns (shown red):



$mathtt colorredOOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOOX?X$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOOXXO?$



Where in each case the $mathtt?$ creates a regularly-spaced triplet whether filled with $mathttO$ or $mathttX$.



Thus any 2-coloured $9times 9$ grid contains a mono $L$, improving from the above paper's requirement for a $1539times 1539$ grid for this condition.



To force a mono-$L$ in a three-coloured grid by the same technique you would thus need $10$ regular-spaced points on the diagonal, creating a sparse lower-half grid of a suitable size to force an $L$ in the remaining two colours. I'm not sure how big this would be but again it should be lower than the corresponding grid size in the paper ($approx 3^3^34$).




Another observation: the diagonal sequences $mathtt OOXOO$, $mathtt OOXXOO$, or $mathtt OXOOXO$ will also produce a mono $L$ due to the pairs of matched colours at the same spacing. Effectively the three evenly-spaced matching colours is a special case of these where the central point does double duty to left and right. Thus the minimum diagonal length to guarantee a mono $L$ comes down to $8$:



$mathtt colorredOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOO?X$




Some references for solved parts of this problem:
On Monochromatic Subsets Of A Rectangular Grid - a $5times 5$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono $L$.
Extremal binary matrices without constant
2-squares - a $15times 14$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono square






share|cite|improve this answer























  • OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:22











  • @athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:58


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













Solution for rectangles (now removed from question): In an infinite grid, you require an infinite number of colours. See the closing note in Every point of a grid is colored in blue, red or green. How to prove there is a monochromatic rectangle? giving the size of a grid required to produce such a rectangle for $n$ colours:





For $n$ colours, using the same approach, we would adopt a grid of $(n+1)$ rows and then require $nn+1 choose 2+1 = n(n+1)n/2 +1 = (n^3+n^2)/2 + 1$ columns to find a rectangle with same-coloured corners.






Work on mono squares:



While the numbers are too big for comfortable imagination, these notes from Gasarch (link) gives a direction to infer the existence of a monochrome grid-aligned square in a sufficiently large 2- or 3-colored grid.




One of the key parts of the proof in that paper requires a rather large grid to guarantee the existence of a mono-colored $L$ (three points of the same colour in the form of an $L$: $(x,y),$ $(x+d,y),$ $(x,y+d)$). I wanted to improve on this, at least for two colours and I think the process can apply for more:



Consider the top left to bottom right diagonal of a two-coloured $ntimes n$ grid.



If there are three regularly spaced points of the same colour on this diagonal, there is a mono $L$ in the grid. Proof: Consider the points that would form an $L$ with each possible pairing of these three points. If one of these is the relevant colour, that is a mono $L$. If all three are the opposite colour, they form a mono $L$ in that opposite colour.



How long a diagonal do we need to force three regular-spaced points of the same colour? Experimentally the answer is $9$, forced from the following initial patterns (shown red):



$mathtt colorredOOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOOX?X$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOOXXO?$



Where in each case the $mathtt?$ creates a regularly-spaced triplet whether filled with $mathttO$ or $mathttX$.



Thus any 2-coloured $9times 9$ grid contains a mono $L$, improving from the above paper's requirement for a $1539times 1539$ grid for this condition.



To force a mono-$L$ in a three-coloured grid by the same technique you would thus need $10$ regular-spaced points on the diagonal, creating a sparse lower-half grid of a suitable size to force an $L$ in the remaining two colours. I'm not sure how big this would be but again it should be lower than the corresponding grid size in the paper ($approx 3^3^34$).




Another observation: the diagonal sequences $mathtt OOXOO$, $mathtt OOXXOO$, or $mathtt OXOOXO$ will also produce a mono $L$ due to the pairs of matched colours at the same spacing. Effectively the three evenly-spaced matching colours is a special case of these where the central point does double duty to left and right. Thus the minimum diagonal length to guarantee a mono $L$ comes down to $8$:



$mathtt colorredOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOO?X$




Some references for solved parts of this problem:
On Monochromatic Subsets Of A Rectangular Grid - a $5times 5$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono $L$.
Extremal binary matrices without constant
2-squares - a $15times 14$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono square






share|cite|improve this answer























  • OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:22











  • @athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:58















up vote
2
down vote













Solution for rectangles (now removed from question): In an infinite grid, you require an infinite number of colours. See the closing note in Every point of a grid is colored in blue, red or green. How to prove there is a monochromatic rectangle? giving the size of a grid required to produce such a rectangle for $n$ colours:





For $n$ colours, using the same approach, we would adopt a grid of $(n+1)$ rows and then require $nn+1 choose 2+1 = n(n+1)n/2 +1 = (n^3+n^2)/2 + 1$ columns to find a rectangle with same-coloured corners.






Work on mono squares:



While the numbers are too big for comfortable imagination, these notes from Gasarch (link) gives a direction to infer the existence of a monochrome grid-aligned square in a sufficiently large 2- or 3-colored grid.




One of the key parts of the proof in that paper requires a rather large grid to guarantee the existence of a mono-colored $L$ (three points of the same colour in the form of an $L$: $(x,y),$ $(x+d,y),$ $(x,y+d)$). I wanted to improve on this, at least for two colours and I think the process can apply for more:



Consider the top left to bottom right diagonal of a two-coloured $ntimes n$ grid.



If there are three regularly spaced points of the same colour on this diagonal, there is a mono $L$ in the grid. Proof: Consider the points that would form an $L$ with each possible pairing of these three points. If one of these is the relevant colour, that is a mono $L$. If all three are the opposite colour, they form a mono $L$ in that opposite colour.



How long a diagonal do we need to force three regular-spaced points of the same colour? Experimentally the answer is $9$, forced from the following initial patterns (shown red):



$mathtt colorredOOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOOX?X$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOOXXO?$



Where in each case the $mathtt?$ creates a regularly-spaced triplet whether filled with $mathttO$ or $mathttX$.



Thus any 2-coloured $9times 9$ grid contains a mono $L$, improving from the above paper's requirement for a $1539times 1539$ grid for this condition.



To force a mono-$L$ in a three-coloured grid by the same technique you would thus need $10$ regular-spaced points on the diagonal, creating a sparse lower-half grid of a suitable size to force an $L$ in the remaining two colours. I'm not sure how big this would be but again it should be lower than the corresponding grid size in the paper ($approx 3^3^34$).




Another observation: the diagonal sequences $mathtt OOXOO$, $mathtt OOXXOO$, or $mathtt OXOOXO$ will also produce a mono $L$ due to the pairs of matched colours at the same spacing. Effectively the three evenly-spaced matching colours is a special case of these where the central point does double duty to left and right. Thus the minimum diagonal length to guarantee a mono $L$ comes down to $8$:



$mathtt colorredOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOO?X$




Some references for solved parts of this problem:
On Monochromatic Subsets Of A Rectangular Grid - a $5times 5$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono $L$.
Extremal binary matrices without constant
2-squares - a $15times 14$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono square






share|cite|improve this answer























  • OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:22











  • @athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:58













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Solution for rectangles (now removed from question): In an infinite grid, you require an infinite number of colours. See the closing note in Every point of a grid is colored in blue, red or green. How to prove there is a monochromatic rectangle? giving the size of a grid required to produce such a rectangle for $n$ colours:





For $n$ colours, using the same approach, we would adopt a grid of $(n+1)$ rows and then require $nn+1 choose 2+1 = n(n+1)n/2 +1 = (n^3+n^2)/2 + 1$ columns to find a rectangle with same-coloured corners.






Work on mono squares:



While the numbers are too big for comfortable imagination, these notes from Gasarch (link) gives a direction to infer the existence of a monochrome grid-aligned square in a sufficiently large 2- or 3-colored grid.




One of the key parts of the proof in that paper requires a rather large grid to guarantee the existence of a mono-colored $L$ (three points of the same colour in the form of an $L$: $(x,y),$ $(x+d,y),$ $(x,y+d)$). I wanted to improve on this, at least for two colours and I think the process can apply for more:



Consider the top left to bottom right diagonal of a two-coloured $ntimes n$ grid.



If there are three regularly spaced points of the same colour on this diagonal, there is a mono $L$ in the grid. Proof: Consider the points that would form an $L$ with each possible pairing of these three points. If one of these is the relevant colour, that is a mono $L$. If all three are the opposite colour, they form a mono $L$ in that opposite colour.



How long a diagonal do we need to force three regular-spaced points of the same colour? Experimentally the answer is $9$, forced from the following initial patterns (shown red):



$mathtt colorredOOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOOX?X$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOOXXO?$



Where in each case the $mathtt?$ creates a regularly-spaced triplet whether filled with $mathttO$ or $mathttX$.



Thus any 2-coloured $9times 9$ grid contains a mono $L$, improving from the above paper's requirement for a $1539times 1539$ grid for this condition.



To force a mono-$L$ in a three-coloured grid by the same technique you would thus need $10$ regular-spaced points on the diagonal, creating a sparse lower-half grid of a suitable size to force an $L$ in the remaining two colours. I'm not sure how big this would be but again it should be lower than the corresponding grid size in the paper ($approx 3^3^34$).




Another observation: the diagonal sequences $mathtt OOXOO$, $mathtt OOXXOO$, or $mathtt OXOOXO$ will also produce a mono $L$ due to the pairs of matched colours at the same spacing. Effectively the three evenly-spaced matching colours is a special case of these where the central point does double duty to left and right. Thus the minimum diagonal length to guarantee a mono $L$ comes down to $8$:



$mathtt colorredOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOO?X$




Some references for solved parts of this problem:
On Monochromatic Subsets Of A Rectangular Grid - a $5times 5$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono $L$.
Extremal binary matrices without constant
2-squares - a $15times 14$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono square






share|cite|improve this answer















Solution for rectangles (now removed from question): In an infinite grid, you require an infinite number of colours. See the closing note in Every point of a grid is colored in blue, red or green. How to prove there is a monochromatic rectangle? giving the size of a grid required to produce such a rectangle for $n$ colours:





For $n$ colours, using the same approach, we would adopt a grid of $(n+1)$ rows and then require $nn+1 choose 2+1 = n(n+1)n/2 +1 = (n^3+n^2)/2 + 1$ columns to find a rectangle with same-coloured corners.






Work on mono squares:



While the numbers are too big for comfortable imagination, these notes from Gasarch (link) gives a direction to infer the existence of a monochrome grid-aligned square in a sufficiently large 2- or 3-colored grid.




One of the key parts of the proof in that paper requires a rather large grid to guarantee the existence of a mono-colored $L$ (three points of the same colour in the form of an $L$: $(x,y),$ $(x+d,y),$ $(x,y+d)$). I wanted to improve on this, at least for two colours and I think the process can apply for more:



Consider the top left to bottom right diagonal of a two-coloured $ntimes n$ grid.



If there are three regularly spaced points of the same colour on this diagonal, there is a mono $L$ in the grid. Proof: Consider the points that would form an $L$ with each possible pairing of these three points. If one of these is the relevant colour, that is a mono $L$. If all three are the opposite colour, they form a mono $L$ in that opposite colour.



How long a diagonal do we need to force three regular-spaced points of the same colour? Experimentally the answer is $9$, forced from the following initial patterns (shown red):



$mathtt colorredOOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOOX?X$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOOXXO?$



Where in each case the $mathtt?$ creates a regularly-spaced triplet whether filled with $mathttO$ or $mathttX$.



Thus any 2-coloured $9times 9$ grid contains a mono $L$, improving from the above paper's requirement for a $1539times 1539$ grid for this condition.



To force a mono-$L$ in a three-coloured grid by the same technique you would thus need $10$ regular-spaced points on the diagonal, creating a sparse lower-half grid of a suitable size to force an $L$ in the remaining two colours. I'm not sure how big this would be but again it should be lower than the corresponding grid size in the paper ($approx 3^3^34$).




Another observation: the diagonal sequences $mathtt OOXOO$, $mathtt OOXXOO$, or $mathtt OXOOXO$ will also produce a mono $L$ due to the pairs of matched colours at the same spacing. Effectively the three evenly-spaced matching colours is a special case of these where the central point does double duty to left and right. Thus the minimum diagonal length to guarantee a mono $L$ comes down to $8$:



$mathtt colorredOOXOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOOXXOXO?$

$mathtt colorredOXOOXX?$

$mathtt colorredOXOXXOO?$

$mathtt colorredOXXOO?X$




Some references for solved parts of this problem:
On Monochromatic Subsets Of A Rectangular Grid - a $5times 5$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono $L$.
Extremal binary matrices without constant
2-squares - a $15times 14$ 2-coloured grid must have a mono square







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 23 at 19:06


























answered Jul 21 at 14:15









Joffan

31.8k43169




31.8k43169











  • OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:22











  • @athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:58

















  • OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:18










  • I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
    – athos
    Jul 21 at 14:22











  • @athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
    – Joffan
    Jul 21 at 14:58
















OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 14:18




OK, you have changed from rectangles to squares... I will think about this a bit more.
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 14:18












I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
– athos
Jul 21 at 14:22





I'm sorry, my bad. I was thinking about square but somehow typed out a "rectangle".
– athos
Jul 21 at 14:22













@athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 14:58





@athos no problem... I 'm just thinking about how big a 2-coloured grid is required to force a grid-aligned square to start with.
– Joffan
Jul 21 at 14:58



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?