Image of a unit disk under a complex function

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












My question is the following:



Prove that the image of the disk $D=z$ under the function $f(z)=cos z$ is contained in the disk $D'=w in mathbbC : $. (Hint: $e^leq|e^z|leq e^$, for all $z in mathbbC$)



By the definition, we have
$$
|w|=|cos z|=frac12left|e^zi+e^-ziright|leqfrac12(|e^zi|+|e^-zi|).
$$
Now, using the hint,
beginequation
|w|leqfrac12(e^+e^).
endequation
And then, as $zin D$, we have $|zi|=|z||i|=|z|leq1$. Therefore
$$
|w|leqfrac12(e^+e^)leqfrac12(e+e^-1)=frace^2+12e.
$$



But I am not sure that I may use the hint to conclude that $|e^-zi|leq e^$. Can anyone have another solution to give me or even how to prove this inequality?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    My question is the following:



    Prove that the image of the disk $D=z$ under the function $f(z)=cos z$ is contained in the disk $D'=w in mathbbC : $. (Hint: $e^leq|e^z|leq e^$, for all $z in mathbbC$)



    By the definition, we have
    $$
    |w|=|cos z|=frac12left|e^zi+e^-ziright|leqfrac12(|e^zi|+|e^-zi|).
    $$
    Now, using the hint,
    beginequation
    |w|leqfrac12(e^+e^).
    endequation
    And then, as $zin D$, we have $|zi|=|z||i|=|z|leq1$. Therefore
    $$
    |w|leqfrac12(e^+e^)leqfrac12(e+e^-1)=frace^2+12e.
    $$



    But I am not sure that I may use the hint to conclude that $|e^-zi|leq e^$. Can anyone have another solution to give me or even how to prove this inequality?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      My question is the following:



      Prove that the image of the disk $D=z$ under the function $f(z)=cos z$ is contained in the disk $D'=w in mathbbC : $. (Hint: $e^leq|e^z|leq e^$, for all $z in mathbbC$)



      By the definition, we have
      $$
      |w|=|cos z|=frac12left|e^zi+e^-ziright|leqfrac12(|e^zi|+|e^-zi|).
      $$
      Now, using the hint,
      beginequation
      |w|leqfrac12(e^+e^).
      endequation
      And then, as $zin D$, we have $|zi|=|z||i|=|z|leq1$. Therefore
      $$
      |w|leqfrac12(e^+e^)leqfrac12(e+e^-1)=frace^2+12e.
      $$



      But I am not sure that I may use the hint to conclude that $|e^-zi|leq e^$. Can anyone have another solution to give me or even how to prove this inequality?







      share|cite|improve this question











      My question is the following:



      Prove that the image of the disk $D=z$ under the function $f(z)=cos z$ is contained in the disk $D'=w in mathbbC : $. (Hint: $e^leq|e^z|leq e^$, for all $z in mathbbC$)



      By the definition, we have
      $$
      |w|=|cos z|=frac12left|e^zi+e^-ziright|leqfrac12(|e^zi|+|e^-zi|).
      $$
      Now, using the hint,
      beginequation
      |w|leqfrac12(e^+e^).
      endequation
      And then, as $zin D$, we have $|zi|=|z||i|=|z|leq1$. Therefore
      $$
      |w|leqfrac12(e^+e^)leqfrac12(e+e^-1)=frace^2+12e.
      $$



      But I am not sure that I may use the hint to conclude that $|e^-zi|leq e^$. Can anyone have another solution to give me or even how to prove this inequality?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 25 at 19:13









      Marcos Paulo

      447




      447




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          I'm not sure the hint is useful. Write $z=x+iy.$ Then



          $$tag 1 |cos z| = |e^iz+ e^-iz|/2 le (|e^iz|+ |e^-iz|)/2 = (e^-y+e^y)/2.$$



          Now $e^-y+e^y$ is even and increases on $[0,1].$ Since $|z|le 1 $ implies $yle 1,$ the right side of $(1)$ is bounded above by $(e^-1+e^1)/2 = (1+e^2)/(2e).$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
            – zhw.
            Jul 25 at 21:37










          • Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 30 at 13:05


















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          I was about to ask if you could have done something wrong when I saw you wrote $frac12(e^-y+e^y)$, but I remembered that $yleq1$ implies that $2yleq2$ and $e^2y leq e^2$, and therefore
          $$|w|leq frac12(e^-y+e^y)=frace^-y2(1+e^2y)leqfrac1+e^22e$$



          I got convinced






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • How did you get the last inequality?
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 3:59










          • $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 14:58










          • What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 15:36










          • You're right :/
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 15:46










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862727%2fimage-of-a-unit-disk-under-a-complex-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          I'm not sure the hint is useful. Write $z=x+iy.$ Then



          $$tag 1 |cos z| = |e^iz+ e^-iz|/2 le (|e^iz|+ |e^-iz|)/2 = (e^-y+e^y)/2.$$



          Now $e^-y+e^y$ is even and increases on $[0,1].$ Since $|z|le 1 $ implies $yle 1,$ the right side of $(1)$ is bounded above by $(e^-1+e^1)/2 = (1+e^2)/(2e).$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
            – zhw.
            Jul 25 at 21:37










          • Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 30 at 13:05















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          I'm not sure the hint is useful. Write $z=x+iy.$ Then



          $$tag 1 |cos z| = |e^iz+ e^-iz|/2 le (|e^iz|+ |e^-iz|)/2 = (e^-y+e^y)/2.$$



          Now $e^-y+e^y$ is even and increases on $[0,1].$ Since $|z|le 1 $ implies $yle 1,$ the right side of $(1)$ is bounded above by $(e^-1+e^1)/2 = (1+e^2)/(2e).$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
            – zhw.
            Jul 25 at 21:37










          • Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 30 at 13:05













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          I'm not sure the hint is useful. Write $z=x+iy.$ Then



          $$tag 1 |cos z| = |e^iz+ e^-iz|/2 le (|e^iz|+ |e^-iz|)/2 = (e^-y+e^y)/2.$$



          Now $e^-y+e^y$ is even and increases on $[0,1].$ Since $|z|le 1 $ implies $yle 1,$ the right side of $(1)$ is bounded above by $(e^-1+e^1)/2 = (1+e^2)/(2e).$






          share|cite|improve this answer















          I'm not sure the hint is useful. Write $z=x+iy.$ Then



          $$tag 1 |cos z| = |e^iz+ e^-iz|/2 le (|e^iz|+ |e^-iz|)/2 = (e^-y+e^y)/2.$$



          Now $e^-y+e^y$ is even and increases on $[0,1].$ Since $|z|le 1 $ implies $yle 1,$ the right side of $(1)$ is bounded above by $(e^-1+e^1)/2 = (1+e^2)/(2e).$







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 25 at 21:35


























          answered Jul 25 at 20:52









          zhw.

          65.6k42870




          65.6k42870











          • I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
            – zhw.
            Jul 25 at 21:37










          • Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 30 at 13:05

















          • I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
            – zhw.
            Jul 25 at 21:37










          • Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 30 at 13:05
















          I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
          – zhw.
          Jul 25 at 21:37




          I made an error in my first answer. It should be fine now.
          – zhw.
          Jul 25 at 21:37












          Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
          – Marcos Paulo
          Jul 30 at 13:05





          Could you please give me more details about the final part of your argument? I can't understand why the right side of (1) is bounded $(e^-1+e^1)/2$. I understand that $yleq1$ implies $e^yleq e^1$, but how can this imply $e^-y leq e^-1$?
          – Marcos Paulo
          Jul 30 at 13:05











          up vote
          0
          down vote













          I was about to ask if you could have done something wrong when I saw you wrote $frac12(e^-y+e^y)$, but I remembered that $yleq1$ implies that $2yleq2$ and $e^2y leq e^2$, and therefore
          $$|w|leq frac12(e^-y+e^y)=frace^-y2(1+e^2y)leqfrac1+e^22e$$



          I got convinced






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • How did you get the last inequality?
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 3:59










          • $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 14:58










          • What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 15:36










          • You're right :/
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 15:46














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          I was about to ask if you could have done something wrong when I saw you wrote $frac12(e^-y+e^y)$, but I remembered that $yleq1$ implies that $2yleq2$ and $e^2y leq e^2$, and therefore
          $$|w|leq frac12(e^-y+e^y)=frace^-y2(1+e^2y)leqfrac1+e^22e$$



          I got convinced






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • How did you get the last inequality?
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 3:59










          • $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 14:58










          • What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 15:36










          • You're right :/
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 15:46












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          I was about to ask if you could have done something wrong when I saw you wrote $frac12(e^-y+e^y)$, but I remembered that $yleq1$ implies that $2yleq2$ and $e^2y leq e^2$, and therefore
          $$|w|leq frac12(e^-y+e^y)=frace^-y2(1+e^2y)leqfrac1+e^22e$$



          I got convinced






          share|cite|improve this answer













          I was about to ask if you could have done something wrong when I saw you wrote $frac12(e^-y+e^y)$, but I remembered that $yleq1$ implies that $2yleq2$ and $e^2y leq e^2$, and therefore
          $$|w|leq frac12(e^-y+e^y)=frace^-y2(1+e^2y)leqfrac1+e^22e$$



          I got convinced







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 26 at 3:46









          Marcos Paulo

          447




          447











          • How did you get the last inequality?
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 3:59










          • $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 14:58










          • What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 15:36










          • You're right :/
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 15:46
















          • How did you get the last inequality?
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 3:59










          • $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 14:58










          • What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
            – zhw.
            Jul 27 at 15:36










          • You're right :/
            – Marcos Paulo
            Jul 27 at 15:46















          How did you get the last inequality?
          – zhw.
          Jul 27 at 3:59




          How did you get the last inequality?
          – zhw.
          Jul 27 at 3:59












          $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
          – Marcos Paulo
          Jul 27 at 14:58




          $e^-y=frac1e^y<frac1e$
          – Marcos Paulo
          Jul 27 at 14:58












          What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
          – zhw.
          Jul 27 at 15:36




          What if $y=-1$ or $y=0?$
          – zhw.
          Jul 27 at 15:36












          You're right :/
          – Marcos Paulo
          Jul 27 at 15:46




          You're right :/
          – Marcos Paulo
          Jul 27 at 15:46












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862727%2fimage-of-a-unit-disk-under-a-complex-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?