$int_theta^theta+pir(u)cos u, du=-lambdasintheta$ and $int_theta^theta+pir(u)sin u;du=lambdacostheta$ for certain $r(u)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












We are given some definitions about a function $r(u)$:



1) $r(u)>0$



2) $r(u)= r(u+2pi)$



3) $r(u)+r(u+pi)= lambda$



4) $r(u)$ is continuous



5) $int_0^pir(u)costheta=0$ and $int_0^pir(u)sintheta=lambda$



The following identities are to be proven:



enter image description here



The first proceeds as follows:



enter image description here



I have tried over and over to prove the second identity, and it seems like it should be easy. However, I keep getting $lambda +lambdacostheta$ instead of $lambdacostheta$ ... what am I missing here? And sorry for the awful formatting, as you can see I'm fairly new to MSE.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    You should be ending up with $lambda +lambda(costheta-cos0)$ which will give you the desired result since $cos0=1$.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:09










  • Aha! Thank you so much, I just ran into so much mental gridlock there.
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 14 at 20:13










  • You're welcome.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:14










  • @MathEnthusiast The approach below is positive.
    – Salahamam_ Fatima
    Jul 14 at 23:53














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












We are given some definitions about a function $r(u)$:



1) $r(u)>0$



2) $r(u)= r(u+2pi)$



3) $r(u)+r(u+pi)= lambda$



4) $r(u)$ is continuous



5) $int_0^pir(u)costheta=0$ and $int_0^pir(u)sintheta=lambda$



The following identities are to be proven:



enter image description here



The first proceeds as follows:



enter image description here



I have tried over and over to prove the second identity, and it seems like it should be easy. However, I keep getting $lambda +lambdacostheta$ instead of $lambdacostheta$ ... what am I missing here? And sorry for the awful formatting, as you can see I'm fairly new to MSE.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    You should be ending up with $lambda +lambda(costheta-cos0)$ which will give you the desired result since $cos0=1$.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:09










  • Aha! Thank you so much, I just ran into so much mental gridlock there.
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 14 at 20:13










  • You're welcome.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:14










  • @MathEnthusiast The approach below is positive.
    – Salahamam_ Fatima
    Jul 14 at 23:53












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





We are given some definitions about a function $r(u)$:



1) $r(u)>0$



2) $r(u)= r(u+2pi)$



3) $r(u)+r(u+pi)= lambda$



4) $r(u)$ is continuous



5) $int_0^pir(u)costheta=0$ and $int_0^pir(u)sintheta=lambda$



The following identities are to be proven:



enter image description here



The first proceeds as follows:



enter image description here



I have tried over and over to prove the second identity, and it seems like it should be easy. However, I keep getting $lambda +lambdacostheta$ instead of $lambdacostheta$ ... what am I missing here? And sorry for the awful formatting, as you can see I'm fairly new to MSE.







share|cite|improve this question













We are given some definitions about a function $r(u)$:



1) $r(u)>0$



2) $r(u)= r(u+2pi)$



3) $r(u)+r(u+pi)= lambda$



4) $r(u)$ is continuous



5) $int_0^pir(u)costheta=0$ and $int_0^pir(u)sintheta=lambda$



The following identities are to be proven:



enter image description here



The first proceeds as follows:



enter image description here



I have tried over and over to prove the second identity, and it seems like it should be easy. However, I keep getting $lambda +lambdacostheta$ instead of $lambdacostheta$ ... what am I missing here? And sorry for the awful formatting, as you can see I'm fairly new to MSE.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 14 at 21:18









Blue

43.7k868141




43.7k868141









asked Jul 14 at 19:43









Math Enthusiast

576




576







  • 2




    You should be ending up with $lambda +lambda(costheta-cos0)$ which will give you the desired result since $cos0=1$.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:09










  • Aha! Thank you so much, I just ran into so much mental gridlock there.
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 14 at 20:13










  • You're welcome.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:14










  • @MathEnthusiast The approach below is positive.
    – Salahamam_ Fatima
    Jul 14 at 23:53












  • 2




    You should be ending up with $lambda +lambda(costheta-cos0)$ which will give you the desired result since $cos0=1$.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:09










  • Aha! Thank you so much, I just ran into so much mental gridlock there.
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 14 at 20:13










  • You're welcome.
    – John Wayland Bales
    Jul 14 at 20:14










  • @MathEnthusiast The approach below is positive.
    – Salahamam_ Fatima
    Jul 14 at 23:53







2




2




You should be ending up with $lambda +lambda(costheta-cos0)$ which will give you the desired result since $cos0=1$.
– John Wayland Bales
Jul 14 at 20:09




You should be ending up with $lambda +lambda(costheta-cos0)$ which will give you the desired result since $cos0=1$.
– John Wayland Bales
Jul 14 at 20:09












Aha! Thank you so much, I just ran into so much mental gridlock there.
– Math Enthusiast
Jul 14 at 20:13




Aha! Thank you so much, I just ran into so much mental gridlock there.
– Math Enthusiast
Jul 14 at 20:13












You're welcome.
– John Wayland Bales
Jul 14 at 20:14




You're welcome.
– John Wayland Bales
Jul 14 at 20:14












@MathEnthusiast The approach below is positive.
– Salahamam_ Fatima
Jul 14 at 23:53




@MathEnthusiast The approach below is positive.
– Salahamam_ Fatima
Jul 14 at 23:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Let $$F(theta)=int_theta^theta+pir(u)sin(u)du.$$



The derivative is



$$F'(theta)=$$



$$r(theta+pi)sin(theta+pi)-r(theta)sin(theta)=$$



$$-sin(theta)Bigl(r(theta+pi)+r(theta)Bigr)=$$



$$-lambda sin(theta)$$



and after integration,



$$F(theta)=lambda cos(theta)+C$$



with $theta=0$, it becomes
$$int_0^pi r(u)sin(u)du=lambda=lambda+C$$
thus $$C=0$$
Done.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 15 at 2:06










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851900%2fint-theta-theta-piru-cos-u-du-lambda-sin-theta-and-int-theta%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Let $$F(theta)=int_theta^theta+pir(u)sin(u)du.$$



The derivative is



$$F'(theta)=$$



$$r(theta+pi)sin(theta+pi)-r(theta)sin(theta)=$$



$$-sin(theta)Bigl(r(theta+pi)+r(theta)Bigr)=$$



$$-lambda sin(theta)$$



and after integration,



$$F(theta)=lambda cos(theta)+C$$



with $theta=0$, it becomes
$$int_0^pi r(u)sin(u)du=lambda=lambda+C$$
thus $$C=0$$
Done.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 15 at 2:06














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Let $$F(theta)=int_theta^theta+pir(u)sin(u)du.$$



The derivative is



$$F'(theta)=$$



$$r(theta+pi)sin(theta+pi)-r(theta)sin(theta)=$$



$$-sin(theta)Bigl(r(theta+pi)+r(theta)Bigr)=$$



$$-lambda sin(theta)$$



and after integration,



$$F(theta)=lambda cos(theta)+C$$



with $theta=0$, it becomes
$$int_0^pi r(u)sin(u)du=lambda=lambda+C$$
thus $$C=0$$
Done.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 15 at 2:06












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






Let $$F(theta)=int_theta^theta+pir(u)sin(u)du.$$



The derivative is



$$F'(theta)=$$



$$r(theta+pi)sin(theta+pi)-r(theta)sin(theta)=$$



$$-sin(theta)Bigl(r(theta+pi)+r(theta)Bigr)=$$



$$-lambda sin(theta)$$



and after integration,



$$F(theta)=lambda cos(theta)+C$$



with $theta=0$, it becomes
$$int_0^pi r(u)sin(u)du=lambda=lambda+C$$
thus $$C=0$$
Done.






share|cite|improve this answer















Let $$F(theta)=int_theta^theta+pir(u)sin(u)du.$$



The derivative is



$$F'(theta)=$$



$$r(theta+pi)sin(theta+pi)-r(theta)sin(theta)=$$



$$-sin(theta)Bigl(r(theta+pi)+r(theta)Bigr)=$$



$$-lambda sin(theta)$$



and after integration,



$$F(theta)=lambda cos(theta)+C$$



with $theta=0$, it becomes
$$int_0^pi r(u)sin(u)du=lambda=lambda+C$$
thus $$C=0$$
Done.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 14 at 21:20


























answered Jul 14 at 21:04









Salahamam_ Fatima

33.6k21229




33.6k21229











  • Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 15 at 2:06
















  • Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
    – Math Enthusiast
    Jul 15 at 2:06















Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
– Math Enthusiast
Jul 15 at 2:06




Thank you very much for answering :) Another user was helpful in pointing out my original error in the comments above, but I will mark this as the correct answer as well because I think it's a very cool approach! In fact, this method is somewhat more direct than the one I was following in my paper...
– Math Enthusiast
Jul 15 at 2:06












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851900%2fint-theta-theta-piru-cos-u-du-lambda-sin-theta-and-int-theta%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?