Is it true that $forall epsilon>0, exists text infinitely many n in mathbbN, s.t. |sin(n) - 1| < epsilon$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I'm wondering if the following statement is true or not.



For me, it's quite 'intuitively' true, but I don't have any idea how to prove.



Statement:




$forall epsilon>0, exists text infinitely many n in mathbbN, s.t. |sin(n) - 1| < epsilon$




Is there anyone to help me out?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Here's a question whose answer proves your statement true (and also proves a lot more): math.stackexchange.com/questions/1084945/…
    – David K
    Jul 21 at 23:28














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I'm wondering if the following statement is true or not.



For me, it's quite 'intuitively' true, but I don't have any idea how to prove.



Statement:




$forall epsilon>0, exists text infinitely many n in mathbbN, s.t. |sin(n) - 1| < epsilon$




Is there anyone to help me out?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Here's a question whose answer proves your statement true (and also proves a lot more): math.stackexchange.com/questions/1084945/…
    – David K
    Jul 21 at 23:28












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I'm wondering if the following statement is true or not.



For me, it's quite 'intuitively' true, but I don't have any idea how to prove.



Statement:




$forall epsilon>0, exists text infinitely many n in mathbbN, s.t. |sin(n) - 1| < epsilon$




Is there anyone to help me out?







share|cite|improve this question













I'm wondering if the following statement is true or not.



For me, it's quite 'intuitively' true, but I don't have any idea how to prove.



Statement:




$forall epsilon>0, exists text infinitely many n in mathbbN, s.t. |sin(n) - 1| < epsilon$




Is there anyone to help me out?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 28 at 17:11









rtybase

8,86721433




8,86721433









asked Jul 21 at 3:43









moreblue

1738




1738











  • Here's a question whose answer proves your statement true (and also proves a lot more): math.stackexchange.com/questions/1084945/…
    – David K
    Jul 21 at 23:28
















  • Here's a question whose answer proves your statement true (and also proves a lot more): math.stackexchange.com/questions/1084945/…
    – David K
    Jul 21 at 23:28















Here's a question whose answer proves your statement true (and also proves a lot more): math.stackexchange.com/questions/1084945/…
– David K
Jul 21 at 23:28




Here's a question whose answer proves your statement true (and also proves a lot more): math.stackexchange.com/questions/1084945/…
– David K
Jul 21 at 23:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













It follows from tree facts ...




Kronecker's approximation theorem (KAT) states that if $alpha$ is irrational then $leftnalpha+k mid n,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$. It is not difficult to show that in fact




Proposition 1. $leftnalpha+k mid colorredninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




I.e. from KAT, $forall x in mathbbR$ and $forall varepsilon>0, exists n_1,k_1 inmathbbZ: left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2$. A consequence of Dirichlet's approximation theorem states that there will be infinitely many integers $q,p$ (in fact $qinmathbbN$) such that $|qalpha-p|<frac1q<fracvarepsilon2$, with large enough $q$. In fact, we can choose $q$ large enough to also have $q+n_1>0$. Then
$$left|colorred(q+n_1)alpha+colorred(k_1-p)-xright|=left|(qalpha -p)+(n_1alpha+k_1-x)right|leq \
left|qalpha -pright|+left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2+fracvarepsilon2=varepsilon$$
and $n=q+n_1>0$, $k=k_1-p$. As a result



$$forall x in mathbbR text and forall varepsilon>0, exists n inmathbbN,k inmathbbZ: left|nalpha+k-xright|<varepsilon$$
and $leftnalpha+k mid ninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




Because $frac12pi$ is irrational, from Proposition 1




Proposition 2. $leftfracn2pi+k mid n in mathbbN, k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.





Because $f(x)=sin2pi x, f:mathbbRrightarrow[-1,1]$ is continuous, then




Proposition 3. $f(M)$ is dense in $[-1,1]$ for any set $M$ dense in $mathbbR$.





Altogether, $sinleft(2pileft(fracn2pi+kright)right)=sinn$, thus




$leftsinn mid n inmathbbNright$ is dense in $[-1,1]$.




As a result, there will be infinitely many $ninmathbbN$ such that $sinn$ is very close to $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It is true. For $n$ to satisfy this it needs to be close to an odd integer times $frac pi 2$. The equidistribution theorem promises you that the multiples of $frac pi 2$ are distributed in the unit interval, so some of them will be close to an integer. There are some loose ends to clean up-how close does $n$ have to be and why can't all the multiples of $frac pi 2$ that are close to integers be even multiples?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
      – rtybase
      Jul 21 at 14:43











    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858232%2fis-it-true-that-forall-epsilon0-exists-text-infinitely-many-n-in-mat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    It follows from tree facts ...




    Kronecker's approximation theorem (KAT) states that if $alpha$ is irrational then $leftnalpha+k mid n,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$. It is not difficult to show that in fact




    Proposition 1. $leftnalpha+k mid colorredninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




    I.e. from KAT, $forall x in mathbbR$ and $forall varepsilon>0, exists n_1,k_1 inmathbbZ: left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2$. A consequence of Dirichlet's approximation theorem states that there will be infinitely many integers $q,p$ (in fact $qinmathbbN$) such that $|qalpha-p|<frac1q<fracvarepsilon2$, with large enough $q$. In fact, we can choose $q$ large enough to also have $q+n_1>0$. Then
    $$left|colorred(q+n_1)alpha+colorred(k_1-p)-xright|=left|(qalpha -p)+(n_1alpha+k_1-x)right|leq \
    left|qalpha -pright|+left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2+fracvarepsilon2=varepsilon$$
    and $n=q+n_1>0$, $k=k_1-p$. As a result



    $$forall x in mathbbR text and forall varepsilon>0, exists n inmathbbN,k inmathbbZ: left|nalpha+k-xright|<varepsilon$$
    and $leftnalpha+k mid ninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




    Because $frac12pi$ is irrational, from Proposition 1




    Proposition 2. $leftfracn2pi+k mid n in mathbbN, k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.





    Because $f(x)=sin2pi x, f:mathbbRrightarrow[-1,1]$ is continuous, then




    Proposition 3. $f(M)$ is dense in $[-1,1]$ for any set $M$ dense in $mathbbR$.





    Altogether, $sinleft(2pileft(fracn2pi+kright)right)=sinn$, thus




    $leftsinn mid n inmathbbNright$ is dense in $[-1,1]$.




    As a result, there will be infinitely many $ninmathbbN$ such that $sinn$ is very close to $1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      It follows from tree facts ...




      Kronecker's approximation theorem (KAT) states that if $alpha$ is irrational then $leftnalpha+k mid n,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$. It is not difficult to show that in fact




      Proposition 1. $leftnalpha+k mid colorredninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




      I.e. from KAT, $forall x in mathbbR$ and $forall varepsilon>0, exists n_1,k_1 inmathbbZ: left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2$. A consequence of Dirichlet's approximation theorem states that there will be infinitely many integers $q,p$ (in fact $qinmathbbN$) such that $|qalpha-p|<frac1q<fracvarepsilon2$, with large enough $q$. In fact, we can choose $q$ large enough to also have $q+n_1>0$. Then
      $$left|colorred(q+n_1)alpha+colorred(k_1-p)-xright|=left|(qalpha -p)+(n_1alpha+k_1-x)right|leq \
      left|qalpha -pright|+left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2+fracvarepsilon2=varepsilon$$
      and $n=q+n_1>0$, $k=k_1-p$. As a result



      $$forall x in mathbbR text and forall varepsilon>0, exists n inmathbbN,k inmathbbZ: left|nalpha+k-xright|<varepsilon$$
      and $leftnalpha+k mid ninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




      Because $frac12pi$ is irrational, from Proposition 1




      Proposition 2. $leftfracn2pi+k mid n in mathbbN, k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.





      Because $f(x)=sin2pi x, f:mathbbRrightarrow[-1,1]$ is continuous, then




      Proposition 3. $f(M)$ is dense in $[-1,1]$ for any set $M$ dense in $mathbbR$.





      Altogether, $sinleft(2pileft(fracn2pi+kright)right)=sinn$, thus




      $leftsinn mid n inmathbbNright$ is dense in $[-1,1]$.




      As a result, there will be infinitely many $ninmathbbN$ such that $sinn$ is very close to $1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        It follows from tree facts ...




        Kronecker's approximation theorem (KAT) states that if $alpha$ is irrational then $leftnalpha+k mid n,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$. It is not difficult to show that in fact




        Proposition 1. $leftnalpha+k mid colorredninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




        I.e. from KAT, $forall x in mathbbR$ and $forall varepsilon>0, exists n_1,k_1 inmathbbZ: left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2$. A consequence of Dirichlet's approximation theorem states that there will be infinitely many integers $q,p$ (in fact $qinmathbbN$) such that $|qalpha-p|<frac1q<fracvarepsilon2$, with large enough $q$. In fact, we can choose $q$ large enough to also have $q+n_1>0$. Then
        $$left|colorred(q+n_1)alpha+colorred(k_1-p)-xright|=left|(qalpha -p)+(n_1alpha+k_1-x)right|leq \
        left|qalpha -pright|+left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2+fracvarepsilon2=varepsilon$$
        and $n=q+n_1>0$, $k=k_1-p$. As a result



        $$forall x in mathbbR text and forall varepsilon>0, exists n inmathbbN,k inmathbbZ: left|nalpha+k-xright|<varepsilon$$
        and $leftnalpha+k mid ninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




        Because $frac12pi$ is irrational, from Proposition 1




        Proposition 2. $leftfracn2pi+k mid n in mathbbN, k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.





        Because $f(x)=sin2pi x, f:mathbbRrightarrow[-1,1]$ is continuous, then




        Proposition 3. $f(M)$ is dense in $[-1,1]$ for any set $M$ dense in $mathbbR$.





        Altogether, $sinleft(2pileft(fracn2pi+kright)right)=sinn$, thus




        $leftsinn mid n inmathbbNright$ is dense in $[-1,1]$.




        As a result, there will be infinitely many $ninmathbbN$ such that $sinn$ is very close to $1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer















        It follows from tree facts ...




        Kronecker's approximation theorem (KAT) states that if $alpha$ is irrational then $leftnalpha+k mid n,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$. It is not difficult to show that in fact




        Proposition 1. $leftnalpha+k mid colorredninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




        I.e. from KAT, $forall x in mathbbR$ and $forall varepsilon>0, exists n_1,k_1 inmathbbZ: left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2$. A consequence of Dirichlet's approximation theorem states that there will be infinitely many integers $q,p$ (in fact $qinmathbbN$) such that $|qalpha-p|<frac1q<fracvarepsilon2$, with large enough $q$. In fact, we can choose $q$ large enough to also have $q+n_1>0$. Then
        $$left|colorred(q+n_1)alpha+colorred(k_1-p)-xright|=left|(qalpha -p)+(n_1alpha+k_1-x)right|leq \
        left|qalpha -pright|+left|n_1alpha+k_1-xright|<fracvarepsilon2+fracvarepsilon2=varepsilon$$
        and $n=q+n_1>0$, $k=k_1-p$. As a result



        $$forall x in mathbbR text and forall varepsilon>0, exists n inmathbbN,k inmathbbZ: left|nalpha+k-xright|<varepsilon$$
        and $leftnalpha+k mid ninmathbbN,k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.




        Because $frac12pi$ is irrational, from Proposition 1




        Proposition 2. $leftfracn2pi+k mid n in mathbbN, k inmathbbZright$ is dense in $mathbbR$.





        Because $f(x)=sin2pi x, f:mathbbRrightarrow[-1,1]$ is continuous, then




        Proposition 3. $f(M)$ is dense in $[-1,1]$ for any set $M$ dense in $mathbbR$.





        Altogether, $sinleft(2pileft(fracn2pi+kright)right)=sinn$, thus




        $leftsinn mid n inmathbbNright$ is dense in $[-1,1]$.




        As a result, there will be infinitely many $ninmathbbN$ such that $sinn$ is very close to $1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 22 at 10:12


























        answered Jul 21 at 22:47









        rtybase

        8,86721433




        8,86721433




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It is true. For $n$ to satisfy this it needs to be close to an odd integer times $frac pi 2$. The equidistribution theorem promises you that the multiples of $frac pi 2$ are distributed in the unit interval, so some of them will be close to an integer. There are some loose ends to clean up-how close does $n$ have to be and why can't all the multiples of $frac pi 2$ that are close to integers be even multiples?






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
              – rtybase
              Jul 21 at 14:43















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It is true. For $n$ to satisfy this it needs to be close to an odd integer times $frac pi 2$. The equidistribution theorem promises you that the multiples of $frac pi 2$ are distributed in the unit interval, so some of them will be close to an integer. There are some loose ends to clean up-how close does $n$ have to be and why can't all the multiples of $frac pi 2$ that are close to integers be even multiples?






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
              – rtybase
              Jul 21 at 14:43













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            It is true. For $n$ to satisfy this it needs to be close to an odd integer times $frac pi 2$. The equidistribution theorem promises you that the multiples of $frac pi 2$ are distributed in the unit interval, so some of them will be close to an integer. There are some loose ends to clean up-how close does $n$ have to be and why can't all the multiples of $frac pi 2$ that are close to integers be even multiples?






            share|cite|improve this answer













            It is true. For $n$ to satisfy this it needs to be close to an odd integer times $frac pi 2$. The equidistribution theorem promises you that the multiples of $frac pi 2$ are distributed in the unit interval, so some of them will be close to an integer. There are some loose ends to clean up-how close does $n$ have to be and why can't all the multiples of $frac pi 2$ that are close to integers be even multiples?







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Jul 21 at 3:53









            Ross Millikan

            276k21186352




            276k21186352











            • Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
              – rtybase
              Jul 21 at 14:43

















            • Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
              – rtybase
              Jul 21 at 14:43
















            Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
            – rtybase
            Jul 21 at 14:43





            Those loose ends would be very useful to sort out this problem math.stackexchange.com/questions/2820234/… ... specifically, best rational approximations of $fracpi2$ with odd denominators, which seems to be an open problem yet.
            – rtybase
            Jul 21 at 14:43













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858232%2fis-it-true-that-forall-epsilon0-exists-text-infinitely-many-n-in-mat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?