Is $phi(z)$ is onto ? choose the correct statement ..
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
My attempts : By mobius Transformation Formula $f(z) = frac az+bcz+ d$ now
here i take $a = c= 1$ as $|fracac|= 1$ , $f(z) = fracac frac(z+ fracba) (z+ fracdc)$ we can write $frac ac = e^itheta$ for some $theta$ $in mathbbR $ ,,,,$f(z) = e^itheta (frac z - beta z-alpha )$ as $ -1 le frac b d le 1$ now i know that $phi (z) = frac1+z1-z < 1$
now by open mapping theorem,,,option 3 is corrects..
is its correct...??
complex-analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
My attempts : By mobius Transformation Formula $f(z) = frac az+bcz+ d$ now
here i take $a = c= 1$ as $|fracac|= 1$ , $f(z) = fracac frac(z+ fracba) (z+ fracdc)$ we can write $frac ac = e^itheta$ for some $theta$ $in mathbbR $ ,,,,$f(z) = e^itheta (frac z - beta z-alpha )$ as $ -1 le frac b d le 1$ now i know that $phi (z) = frac1+z1-z < 1$
now by open mapping theorem,,,option 3 is corrects..
is its correct...??
complex-analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
My attempts : By mobius Transformation Formula $f(z) = frac az+bcz+ d$ now
here i take $a = c= 1$ as $|fracac|= 1$ , $f(z) = fracac frac(z+ fracba) (z+ fracdc)$ we can write $frac ac = e^itheta$ for some $theta$ $in mathbbR $ ,,,,$f(z) = e^itheta (frac z - beta z-alpha )$ as $ -1 le frac b d le 1$ now i know that $phi (z) = frac1+z1-z < 1$
now by open mapping theorem,,,option 3 is corrects..
is its correct...??
complex-analysis
My attempts : By mobius Transformation Formula $f(z) = frac az+bcz+ d$ now
here i take $a = c= 1$ as $|fracac|= 1$ , $f(z) = fracac frac(z+ fracba) (z+ fracdc)$ we can write $frac ac = e^itheta$ for some $theta$ $in mathbbR $ ,,,,$f(z) = e^itheta (frac z - beta z-alpha )$ as $ -1 le frac b d le 1$ now i know that $phi (z) = frac1+z1-z < 1$
now by open mapping theorem,,,option 3 is corrects..
is its correct...??
complex-analysis
asked Jul 14 at 18:27
stupid
58419
58419
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. Note that$$varphi(z)=-1iff1+z=-1+ziff-1=1$$and therefore $-1$ does not belong to the range of $varphi$.
On the other hand, the fourth option is correct because, if $wneq-1$,$$varphi(z)=wiff z=fracw-1w+1.$$
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
1
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. Note that$$varphi(z)=-1iff1+z=-1+ziff-1=1$$and therefore $-1$ does not belong to the range of $varphi$.
On the other hand, the fourth option is correct because, if $wneq-1$,$$varphi(z)=wiff z=fracw-1w+1.$$
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
1
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. Note that$$varphi(z)=-1iff1+z=-1+ziff-1=1$$and therefore $-1$ does not belong to the range of $varphi$.
On the other hand, the fourth option is correct because, if $wneq-1$,$$varphi(z)=wiff z=fracw-1w+1.$$
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
1
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. Note that$$varphi(z)=-1iff1+z=-1+ziff-1=1$$and therefore $-1$ does not belong to the range of $varphi$.
On the other hand, the fourth option is correct because, if $wneq-1$,$$varphi(z)=wiff z=fracw-1w+1.$$
No, it is not correct. Note that$$varphi(z)=-1iff1+z=-1+ziff-1=1$$and therefore $-1$ does not belong to the range of $varphi$.
On the other hand, the fourth option is correct because, if $wneq-1$,$$varphi(z)=wiff z=fracw-1w+1.$$
edited Jul 14 at 18:34
answered Jul 14 at 18:30


José Carlos Santos
114k1698177
114k1698177
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
1
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
1
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
thanks u @ Jose carlos sir ..then which one is correct ??? can u elaborate the correct answer ?
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:32
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:35
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
yes i got its @ Jose sir.....one more last doubts can u tell me why option 1 is not correct ??
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:40
1
1
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
Because, for instance, $varphi(0)=1$.
– José Carlos Santos
Jul 14 at 18:41
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
thanks u i gots its @ jose sir
– stupid
Jul 14 at 18:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851839%2fis-phiz-is-onto-choose-the-correct-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password