Is the $x in Bbb R : x ne 0$ set open, close or neither?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Is the $x in Bbb R : x ne 0$ set open, close or neither?
The answer is open. However, I can't see why.
Set $A :=x in Bbb R : x ne 0$. Following the definition it will be open if for every $a$ from $A$ and any positive $õ$ the $V_õ(a)$ ⊆ $A$. Now, my intuition says, that if we take $a$ such that it will be really close to $0$ and $õ$ be big enough, then $õ$ neighbourhood would not be contained in $A$ since it will contain $0$ too.
Can you, please, explain it to me?
real-analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Is the $x in Bbb R : x ne 0$ set open, close or neither?
The answer is open. However, I can't see why.
Set $A :=x in Bbb R : x ne 0$. Following the definition it will be open if for every $a$ from $A$ and any positive $õ$ the $V_õ(a)$ ⊆ $A$. Now, my intuition says, that if we take $a$ such that it will be really close to $0$ and $õ$ be big enough, then $õ$ neighbourhood would not be contained in $A$ since it will contain $0$ too.
Can you, please, explain it to me?
real-analysis
1
It's not about taking $epsilon$ large enough, it's about whether there's room to fit in some $epsilon$. Take $x$ as close as you like to $0$ and choose $epsilon < x/2$; your neighbourhood then doesn't include $0$.
– postmortes
2 days ago
2
$xin mathbbR: xneq 0^c = 0$, which is closed
– Rumpelstiltskin
2 days ago
It's a union of two open intervals
– JuliusL33t
2 days ago
$epsilon$ is kind of "flexible" range: for any small $a$ given, you take a smaller $epsilon$ - if that $epsilon$ exists you say that the set is open. Note again: you're taking a particular $epsilon$.
– poyea
2 days ago
@TheSimpli This is not set theory, please do not add the tag.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Is the $x in Bbb R : x ne 0$ set open, close or neither?
The answer is open. However, I can't see why.
Set $A :=x in Bbb R : x ne 0$. Following the definition it will be open if for every $a$ from $A$ and any positive $õ$ the $V_õ(a)$ ⊆ $A$. Now, my intuition says, that if we take $a$ such that it will be really close to $0$ and $õ$ be big enough, then $õ$ neighbourhood would not be contained in $A$ since it will contain $0$ too.
Can you, please, explain it to me?
real-analysis
Is the $x in Bbb R : x ne 0$ set open, close or neither?
The answer is open. However, I can't see why.
Set $A :=x in Bbb R : x ne 0$. Following the definition it will be open if for every $a$ from $A$ and any positive $õ$ the $V_õ(a)$ ⊆ $A$. Now, my intuition says, that if we take $a$ such that it will be really close to $0$ and $õ$ be big enough, then $õ$ neighbourhood would not be contained in $A$ since it will contain $0$ too.
Can you, please, explain it to me?
real-analysis
edited 2 days ago
Andrés E. Caicedo
63k7150235
63k7150235
asked 2 days ago
Sargis Iskandaryan
43611
43611
1
It's not about taking $epsilon$ large enough, it's about whether there's room to fit in some $epsilon$. Take $x$ as close as you like to $0$ and choose $epsilon < x/2$; your neighbourhood then doesn't include $0$.
– postmortes
2 days ago
2
$xin mathbbR: xneq 0^c = 0$, which is closed
– Rumpelstiltskin
2 days ago
It's a union of two open intervals
– JuliusL33t
2 days ago
$epsilon$ is kind of "flexible" range: for any small $a$ given, you take a smaller $epsilon$ - if that $epsilon$ exists you say that the set is open. Note again: you're taking a particular $epsilon$.
– poyea
2 days ago
@TheSimpli This is not set theory, please do not add the tag.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
1
It's not about taking $epsilon$ large enough, it's about whether there's room to fit in some $epsilon$. Take $x$ as close as you like to $0$ and choose $epsilon < x/2$; your neighbourhood then doesn't include $0$.
– postmortes
2 days ago
2
$xin mathbbR: xneq 0^c = 0$, which is closed
– Rumpelstiltskin
2 days ago
It's a union of two open intervals
– JuliusL33t
2 days ago
$epsilon$ is kind of "flexible" range: for any small $a$ given, you take a smaller $epsilon$ - if that $epsilon$ exists you say that the set is open. Note again: you're taking a particular $epsilon$.
– poyea
2 days ago
@TheSimpli This is not set theory, please do not add the tag.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago
1
1
It's not about taking $epsilon$ large enough, it's about whether there's room to fit in some $epsilon$. Take $x$ as close as you like to $0$ and choose $epsilon < x/2$; your neighbourhood then doesn't include $0$.
– postmortes
2 days ago
It's not about taking $epsilon$ large enough, it's about whether there's room to fit in some $epsilon$. Take $x$ as close as you like to $0$ and choose $epsilon < x/2$; your neighbourhood then doesn't include $0$.
– postmortes
2 days ago
2
2
$xin mathbbR: xneq 0^c = 0$, which is closed
– Rumpelstiltskin
2 days ago
$xin mathbbR: xneq 0^c = 0$, which is closed
– Rumpelstiltskin
2 days ago
It's a union of two open intervals
– JuliusL33t
2 days ago
It's a union of two open intervals
– JuliusL33t
2 days ago
$epsilon$ is kind of "flexible" range: for any small $a$ given, you take a smaller $epsilon$ - if that $epsilon$ exists you say that the set is open. Note again: you're taking a particular $epsilon$.
– poyea
2 days ago
$epsilon$ is kind of "flexible" range: for any small $a$ given, you take a smaller $epsilon$ - if that $epsilon$ exists you say that the set is open. Note again: you're taking a particular $epsilon$.
– poyea
2 days ago
@TheSimpli This is not set theory, please do not add the tag.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago
@TheSimpli This is not set theory, please do not add the tag.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You have to be very careful with the quantifiers here.
A set $A$ will be open if for every $a in A$ there is some $epsilon$ which has $V_epsilon subseteq A$, not all $epsilon$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
There is an error in your definition of open set. It doesn't have to hold for any positive $epsilon$ but for some positive $epsilon$. Now do you see why $A$ is open?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
To show that a set $A$ is open, pick an element, and you just show that there is an open ball such that the open ball resides in $A$.
We do not have to worry about open balls with large radius, we just have to find one that is sufficiently small that resides in the set.
In particular, if $a$ is pick, you can choose your radius to be $|a|$ and it will reside in the set.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
We know that this set is open since $$forall xin Aquad,quadexists epsilonquad,quad (x-epsilon,x+epsilon)in A$$for example take $epsilon=dfrac10$ , but it is not closed. Take the convergent sequence $$a_n=dfrac1n$$whose limit doesn't belong to $A$ while the terms do.
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You have to be very careful with the quantifiers here.
A set $A$ will be open if for every $a in A$ there is some $epsilon$ which has $V_epsilon subseteq A$, not all $epsilon$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You have to be very careful with the quantifiers here.
A set $A$ will be open if for every $a in A$ there is some $epsilon$ which has $V_epsilon subseteq A$, not all $epsilon$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You have to be very careful with the quantifiers here.
A set $A$ will be open if for every $a in A$ there is some $epsilon$ which has $V_epsilon subseteq A$, not all $epsilon$.
You have to be very careful with the quantifiers here.
A set $A$ will be open if for every $a in A$ there is some $epsilon$ which has $V_epsilon subseteq A$, not all $epsilon$.
answered 2 days ago


Daniel Mroz
851314
851314
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
There is an error in your definition of open set. It doesn't have to hold for any positive $epsilon$ but for some positive $epsilon$. Now do you see why $A$ is open?
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
There is an error in your definition of open set. It doesn't have to hold for any positive $epsilon$ but for some positive $epsilon$. Now do you see why $A$ is open?
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
There is an error in your definition of open set. It doesn't have to hold for any positive $epsilon$ but for some positive $epsilon$. Now do you see why $A$ is open?
There is an error in your definition of open set. It doesn't have to hold for any positive $epsilon$ but for some positive $epsilon$. Now do you see why $A$ is open?
answered 2 days ago
Gautam Shenoy
7,00011444
7,00011444
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
To show that a set $A$ is open, pick an element, and you just show that there is an open ball such that the open ball resides in $A$.
We do not have to worry about open balls with large radius, we just have to find one that is sufficiently small that resides in the set.
In particular, if $a$ is pick, you can choose your radius to be $|a|$ and it will reside in the set.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
To show that a set $A$ is open, pick an element, and you just show that there is an open ball such that the open ball resides in $A$.
We do not have to worry about open balls with large radius, we just have to find one that is sufficiently small that resides in the set.
In particular, if $a$ is pick, you can choose your radius to be $|a|$ and it will reside in the set.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
To show that a set $A$ is open, pick an element, and you just show that there is an open ball such that the open ball resides in $A$.
We do not have to worry about open balls with large radius, we just have to find one that is sufficiently small that resides in the set.
In particular, if $a$ is pick, you can choose your radius to be $|a|$ and it will reside in the set.
To show that a set $A$ is open, pick an element, and you just show that there is an open ball such that the open ball resides in $A$.
We do not have to worry about open balls with large radius, we just have to find one that is sufficiently small that resides in the set.
In particular, if $a$ is pick, you can choose your radius to be $|a|$ and it will reside in the set.
answered 2 days ago


Siong Thye Goh
76.5k124594
76.5k124594
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
We know that this set is open since $$forall xin Aquad,quadexists epsilonquad,quad (x-epsilon,x+epsilon)in A$$for example take $epsilon=dfrac10$ , but it is not closed. Take the convergent sequence $$a_n=dfrac1n$$whose limit doesn't belong to $A$ while the terms do.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
We know that this set is open since $$forall xin Aquad,quadexists epsilonquad,quad (x-epsilon,x+epsilon)in A$$for example take $epsilon=dfrac10$ , but it is not closed. Take the convergent sequence $$a_n=dfrac1n$$whose limit doesn't belong to $A$ while the terms do.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
We know that this set is open since $$forall xin Aquad,quadexists epsilonquad,quad (x-epsilon,x+epsilon)in A$$for example take $epsilon=dfrac10$ , but it is not closed. Take the convergent sequence $$a_n=dfrac1n$$whose limit doesn't belong to $A$ while the terms do.
We know that this set is open since $$forall xin Aquad,quadexists epsilonquad,quad (x-epsilon,x+epsilon)in A$$for example take $epsilon=dfrac10$ , but it is not closed. Take the convergent sequence $$a_n=dfrac1n$$whose limit doesn't belong to $A$ while the terms do.
answered 2 days ago


Mostafa Ayaz
8,5203530
8,5203530
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872014%2fis-the-x-in-bbb-r-x-ne-0-set-open-close-or-neither%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
It's not about taking $epsilon$ large enough, it's about whether there's room to fit in some $epsilon$. Take $x$ as close as you like to $0$ and choose $epsilon < x/2$; your neighbourhood then doesn't include $0$.
– postmortes
2 days ago
2
$xin mathbbR: xneq 0^c = 0$, which is closed
– Rumpelstiltskin
2 days ago
It's a union of two open intervals
– JuliusL33t
2 days ago
$epsilon$ is kind of "flexible" range: for any small $a$ given, you take a smaller $epsilon$ - if that $epsilon$ exists you say that the set is open. Note again: you're taking a particular $epsilon$.
– poyea
2 days ago
@TheSimpli This is not set theory, please do not add the tag.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago