Iwasawa Decomposition $SL_n(BbbR)$ Proof

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












A special case of the Iwasawa Decomposition for matrices is the following: Let $G=SL_n(BbbR)$, $K=$ real unitary matrices, $U=$ upper triangular matrices with $1$'s on the diagonal (called unipotent), and $A=$ diagonal matrices with positive elements ($0$ everywhere else). Then, the product map $UtimesAtimesKrightarrowG$ given by $(u,a,k)mapstouak$ is a bijection.



I am looking at the proof of this in Serge Lang's Undergraduate Algebra, Section 6 Chapter 4 pg 246, however, I need some help in understanding the beginning of the proof:



"Let $e_1,..,e_n$ be the standard vertical unit vectors of $BbbR^n$. Let $g=(g_ij)inG$. Then we have $ge_i=beginpmatrix g_1i \ vdots \ g_ni endpmatrix=g^(i)=sum_q=1^n g_qie_q$. There exists an upper triangular matrix $B=(b_ij)$, so with $b_ij=0$ if $i>j$ such that $b_11g^(1)=e'_1$,..........,$b_1jg^(1)+b_2jg^(2)+...+b_jjg^(j)=e'_j$,.............., $b_1ng^(1)+b_2ng^(2)+...+b_nng^(n)=e'_n$, such that the diagonal elements are positive, that is $b_11,...,b_nn>0$, and such that the vectors $e'_1,...,e'_n$ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors. Getting such a matrix B is merely applying the usual Gram Schmidt orthogonalisation process, subtracting a linear combination of previous vectors to get orthogonality, and then dividing by the norms to get unit vectors."



My problem here is understanding the matrix $B$ and how it is obtained. Having studied the Gram Schmidt Orthogonalisation process in a linear algebra course, I simply learnt it as a way to construct an orthogonal (orthonormal by diving by norms) basis for a finite dimensional inner product space (in this case $BbbR$) given any basis. Could someone please explain how Lang then guarantees the existence of this matrix $B$.



Thank you.



ADDITIONAL (carrying on where Lang's proof left off): Let $gB=kinK$. Then $ke_i=e'_i$, so the columns of $k$ are orthonormal, so $k$ is real unitary, and $g=kB^-1$. Then $g^-1=Bk^-1$ and $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    A special case of the Iwasawa Decomposition for matrices is the following: Let $G=SL_n(BbbR)$, $K=$ real unitary matrices, $U=$ upper triangular matrices with $1$'s on the diagonal (called unipotent), and $A=$ diagonal matrices with positive elements ($0$ everywhere else). Then, the product map $UtimesAtimesKrightarrowG$ given by $(u,a,k)mapstouak$ is a bijection.



    I am looking at the proof of this in Serge Lang's Undergraduate Algebra, Section 6 Chapter 4 pg 246, however, I need some help in understanding the beginning of the proof:



    "Let $e_1,..,e_n$ be the standard vertical unit vectors of $BbbR^n$. Let $g=(g_ij)inG$. Then we have $ge_i=beginpmatrix g_1i \ vdots \ g_ni endpmatrix=g^(i)=sum_q=1^n g_qie_q$. There exists an upper triangular matrix $B=(b_ij)$, so with $b_ij=0$ if $i>j$ such that $b_11g^(1)=e'_1$,..........,$b_1jg^(1)+b_2jg^(2)+...+b_jjg^(j)=e'_j$,.............., $b_1ng^(1)+b_2ng^(2)+...+b_nng^(n)=e'_n$, such that the diagonal elements are positive, that is $b_11,...,b_nn>0$, and such that the vectors $e'_1,...,e'_n$ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors. Getting such a matrix B is merely applying the usual Gram Schmidt orthogonalisation process, subtracting a linear combination of previous vectors to get orthogonality, and then dividing by the norms to get unit vectors."



    My problem here is understanding the matrix $B$ and how it is obtained. Having studied the Gram Schmidt Orthogonalisation process in a linear algebra course, I simply learnt it as a way to construct an orthogonal (orthonormal by diving by norms) basis for a finite dimensional inner product space (in this case $BbbR$) given any basis. Could someone please explain how Lang then guarantees the existence of this matrix $B$.



    Thank you.



    ADDITIONAL (carrying on where Lang's proof left off): Let $gB=kinK$. Then $ke_i=e'_i$, so the columns of $k$ are orthonormal, so $k$ is real unitary, and $g=kB^-1$. Then $g^-1=Bk^-1$ and $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      A special case of the Iwasawa Decomposition for matrices is the following: Let $G=SL_n(BbbR)$, $K=$ real unitary matrices, $U=$ upper triangular matrices with $1$'s on the diagonal (called unipotent), and $A=$ diagonal matrices with positive elements ($0$ everywhere else). Then, the product map $UtimesAtimesKrightarrowG$ given by $(u,a,k)mapstouak$ is a bijection.



      I am looking at the proof of this in Serge Lang's Undergraduate Algebra, Section 6 Chapter 4 pg 246, however, I need some help in understanding the beginning of the proof:



      "Let $e_1,..,e_n$ be the standard vertical unit vectors of $BbbR^n$. Let $g=(g_ij)inG$. Then we have $ge_i=beginpmatrix g_1i \ vdots \ g_ni endpmatrix=g^(i)=sum_q=1^n g_qie_q$. There exists an upper triangular matrix $B=(b_ij)$, so with $b_ij=0$ if $i>j$ such that $b_11g^(1)=e'_1$,..........,$b_1jg^(1)+b_2jg^(2)+...+b_jjg^(j)=e'_j$,.............., $b_1ng^(1)+b_2ng^(2)+...+b_nng^(n)=e'_n$, such that the diagonal elements are positive, that is $b_11,...,b_nn>0$, and such that the vectors $e'_1,...,e'_n$ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors. Getting such a matrix B is merely applying the usual Gram Schmidt orthogonalisation process, subtracting a linear combination of previous vectors to get orthogonality, and then dividing by the norms to get unit vectors."



      My problem here is understanding the matrix $B$ and how it is obtained. Having studied the Gram Schmidt Orthogonalisation process in a linear algebra course, I simply learnt it as a way to construct an orthogonal (orthonormal by diving by norms) basis for a finite dimensional inner product space (in this case $BbbR$) given any basis. Could someone please explain how Lang then guarantees the existence of this matrix $B$.



      Thank you.



      ADDITIONAL (carrying on where Lang's proof left off): Let $gB=kinK$. Then $ke_i=e'_i$, so the columns of $k$ are orthonormal, so $k$ is real unitary, and $g=kB^-1$. Then $g^-1=Bk^-1$ and $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$.







      share|cite|improve this question













      A special case of the Iwasawa Decomposition for matrices is the following: Let $G=SL_n(BbbR)$, $K=$ real unitary matrices, $U=$ upper triangular matrices with $1$'s on the diagonal (called unipotent), and $A=$ diagonal matrices with positive elements ($0$ everywhere else). Then, the product map $UtimesAtimesKrightarrowG$ given by $(u,a,k)mapstouak$ is a bijection.



      I am looking at the proof of this in Serge Lang's Undergraduate Algebra, Section 6 Chapter 4 pg 246, however, I need some help in understanding the beginning of the proof:



      "Let $e_1,..,e_n$ be the standard vertical unit vectors of $BbbR^n$. Let $g=(g_ij)inG$. Then we have $ge_i=beginpmatrix g_1i \ vdots \ g_ni endpmatrix=g^(i)=sum_q=1^n g_qie_q$. There exists an upper triangular matrix $B=(b_ij)$, so with $b_ij=0$ if $i>j$ such that $b_11g^(1)=e'_1$,..........,$b_1jg^(1)+b_2jg^(2)+...+b_jjg^(j)=e'_j$,.............., $b_1ng^(1)+b_2ng^(2)+...+b_nng^(n)=e'_n$, such that the diagonal elements are positive, that is $b_11,...,b_nn>0$, and such that the vectors $e'_1,...,e'_n$ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors. Getting such a matrix B is merely applying the usual Gram Schmidt orthogonalisation process, subtracting a linear combination of previous vectors to get orthogonality, and then dividing by the norms to get unit vectors."



      My problem here is understanding the matrix $B$ and how it is obtained. Having studied the Gram Schmidt Orthogonalisation process in a linear algebra course, I simply learnt it as a way to construct an orthogonal (orthonormal by diving by norms) basis for a finite dimensional inner product space (in this case $BbbR$) given any basis. Could someone please explain how Lang then guarantees the existence of this matrix $B$.



      Thank you.



      ADDITIONAL (carrying on where Lang's proof left off): Let $gB=kinK$. Then $ke_i=e'_i$, so the columns of $k$ are orthonormal, so $k$ is real unitary, and $g=kB^-1$. Then $g^-1=Bk^-1$ and $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago
























      asked 2 days ago









      Daniele1234

      716214




      716214




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Gram Schmidt is as follows, depicted visually
          enter image description here



          such that



          $$a_1 = r_11 q_1 \a_2 = r_12q_1 + r_22q_2\ a_3= r_13q_1 +r_23q_2 + r_33 q_3 \ vdots \ a_n = r_1n q_1 + r_2nq_2 + cdots + r_nn q_n $$



          giving



          $$A = hatQhatR $$



          The matrix $B$ appears to be the matrix $R$.



          How it is found



          $$ q_1 = fraca_1r_11\ q_2 = fraca_2-r_12q_1r_22\q_3 = fraca_3-r_13q_1-r_23q_2r_33\ vdots \ q_n = fraca_n - sum_i=1^n r_inq_ir_nn$$



          where



          $$ |r_ij | = q_i^*a_j \
          | r_jj| = | a_j = sum_i=1^j-1 r_ijq_i|_2$$



          seen here
          enter image description here



          Giving your $B$ from that






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago






          • 1




            The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago











          • Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago










          • This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago











          • @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872090%2fiwasawa-decomposition-sl-n-bbbr-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Gram Schmidt is as follows, depicted visually
          enter image description here



          such that



          $$a_1 = r_11 q_1 \a_2 = r_12q_1 + r_22q_2\ a_3= r_13q_1 +r_23q_2 + r_33 q_3 \ vdots \ a_n = r_1n q_1 + r_2nq_2 + cdots + r_nn q_n $$



          giving



          $$A = hatQhatR $$



          The matrix $B$ appears to be the matrix $R$.



          How it is found



          $$ q_1 = fraca_1r_11\ q_2 = fraca_2-r_12q_1r_22\q_3 = fraca_3-r_13q_1-r_23q_2r_33\ vdots \ q_n = fraca_n - sum_i=1^n r_inq_ir_nn$$



          where



          $$ |r_ij | = q_i^*a_j \
          | r_jj| = | a_j = sum_i=1^j-1 r_ijq_i|_2$$



          seen here
          enter image description here



          Giving your $B$ from that






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago






          • 1




            The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago











          • Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago










          • This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago











          • @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Gram Schmidt is as follows, depicted visually
          enter image description here



          such that



          $$a_1 = r_11 q_1 \a_2 = r_12q_1 + r_22q_2\ a_3= r_13q_1 +r_23q_2 + r_33 q_3 \ vdots \ a_n = r_1n q_1 + r_2nq_2 + cdots + r_nn q_n $$



          giving



          $$A = hatQhatR $$



          The matrix $B$ appears to be the matrix $R$.



          How it is found



          $$ q_1 = fraca_1r_11\ q_2 = fraca_2-r_12q_1r_22\q_3 = fraca_3-r_13q_1-r_23q_2r_33\ vdots \ q_n = fraca_n - sum_i=1^n r_inq_ir_nn$$



          where



          $$ |r_ij | = q_i^*a_j \
          | r_jj| = | a_j = sum_i=1^j-1 r_ijq_i|_2$$



          seen here
          enter image description here



          Giving your $B$ from that






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago






          • 1




            The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago











          • Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago










          • This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago











          • @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Gram Schmidt is as follows, depicted visually
          enter image description here



          such that



          $$a_1 = r_11 q_1 \a_2 = r_12q_1 + r_22q_2\ a_3= r_13q_1 +r_23q_2 + r_33 q_3 \ vdots \ a_n = r_1n q_1 + r_2nq_2 + cdots + r_nn q_n $$



          giving



          $$A = hatQhatR $$



          The matrix $B$ appears to be the matrix $R$.



          How it is found



          $$ q_1 = fraca_1r_11\ q_2 = fraca_2-r_12q_1r_22\q_3 = fraca_3-r_13q_1-r_23q_2r_33\ vdots \ q_n = fraca_n - sum_i=1^n r_inq_ir_nn$$



          where



          $$ |r_ij | = q_i^*a_j \
          | r_jj| = | a_j = sum_i=1^j-1 r_ijq_i|_2$$



          seen here
          enter image description here



          Giving your $B$ from that






          share|cite|improve this answer















          Gram Schmidt is as follows, depicted visually
          enter image description here



          such that



          $$a_1 = r_11 q_1 \a_2 = r_12q_1 + r_22q_2\ a_3= r_13q_1 +r_23q_2 + r_33 q_3 \ vdots \ a_n = r_1n q_1 + r_2nq_2 + cdots + r_nn q_n $$



          giving



          $$A = hatQhatR $$



          The matrix $B$ appears to be the matrix $R$.



          How it is found



          $$ q_1 = fraca_1r_11\ q_2 = fraca_2-r_12q_1r_22\q_3 = fraca_3-r_13q_1-r_23q_2r_33\ vdots \ q_n = fraca_n - sum_i=1^n r_inq_ir_nn$$



          where



          $$ |r_ij | = q_i^*a_j \
          | r_jj| = | a_j = sum_i=1^j-1 r_ijq_i|_2$$



          seen here
          enter image description here



          Giving your $B$ from that







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago


























          answered 2 days ago









          Geronimo

          809715




          809715











          • So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago






          • 1




            The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago











          • Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago










          • This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago











          • @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago
















          • So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago






          • 1




            The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago











          • Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago










          • This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
            – Daniele1234
            2 days ago











          • @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
            – Geronimo
            2 days ago















          So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
          – Daniele1234
          2 days ago




          So this is just a reference to the QR decomposition, which uses the Gram-Schmidt process
          – Daniele1234
          2 days ago




          1




          1




          The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
          – Geronimo
          2 days ago





          The QR decomposition is Gram-Schmidt. It decomposes a matrix into an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix of coefficients. Your question was constructing the matrix B which was an upper triangular matrix with vectors that $e_1, e_2, cdots, e_n$ that are orthogonal...these $q_1, q_2, cdots q_n $ I would imagine...you can't construct the orthogonal vectors without the coefficients...you're subtracting them off.
          – Geronimo
          2 days ago













          Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
          – Daniele1234
          2 days ago




          Lang then states that one can write $B=au$, where $a$ is the diagonal matrix with $a_i=b_ii$ and $u$ is unipotent, $u=a^-1B$. I understand why $u$ is thus unipotent, but could you please explain how he guarantees $B=au$. Thank you
          – Daniele1234
          2 days ago












          This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
          – Daniele1234
          2 days ago





          This is after having stated, $gB=k$, where $k$ is unitary , so $g=kB^-1$, so $g^-1=Bk^-1$ (I understand this) and (thus?) $B=au$.
          – Daniele1234
          2 days ago













          @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
          – Geronimo
          2 days ago




          @Daniele1234 I'll have to look at Langs book
          – Geronimo
          2 days ago












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872090%2fiwasawa-decomposition-sl-n-bbbr-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?