Power Series and Recursion

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.



For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.




What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.



    For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.




    What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.



      For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.




      What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?







      share|cite|improve this question














      Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.



      For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.




      What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Rócherz

      2,1811417




      2,1811417









      asked yesterday









      seekingalpha23

      156




      156




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          It means find a solution of the form
          $$
          y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
          $$
          were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
            – seekingalpha23
            20 hours ago










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872742%2fpower-series-and-recursion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          It means find a solution of the form
          $$
          y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
          $$
          were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
            – seekingalpha23
            20 hours ago














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          It means find a solution of the form
          $$
          y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
          $$
          were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
            – seekingalpha23
            20 hours ago












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          It means find a solution of the form
          $$
          y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
          $$
          were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          It means find a solution of the form
          $$
          y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
          $$
          were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered yesterday









          Julián Aguirre

          64.3k23894




          64.3k23894











          • Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
            – seekingalpha23
            20 hours ago
















          • Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
            – seekingalpha23
            20 hours ago















          Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
          – seekingalpha23
          20 hours ago




          Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
          – seekingalpha23
          20 hours ago












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872742%2fpower-series-and-recursion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon