Power Series and Recursion
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.
For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.
What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?
differential-equations power-series recursion independence
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.
For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.
What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?
differential-equations power-series recursion independence
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.
For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.
What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?
differential-equations power-series recursion independence
Consider the equation: $$(1-x^2)y'' -xy' +alpha^2 y=0$$ where $alpha$ is a real number.
For $|x|<1$ and all values of $alpha$, look for a fundamental set of solutions $y_1$, $y_2$ which are power series in $x$. Prove that they are linearly independent. You can leave the formula for the coefficients in recursive form, but compute the first three terms of $y_1$, $y_2$ explicitly in terms of $alpha$.
What does it mean when the question asserts to look for a fundamental set of solutions that are a power series in $x$? Likewise, what does the question mean when it states to leave the coefficients in recursive form?
differential-equations power-series recursion independence
edited yesterday


Rócherz
2,1811417
2,1811417
asked yesterday
seekingalpha23
156
156
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It means find a solution of the form
$$
y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
$$
were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It means find a solution of the form
$$
y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
$$
were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
It means find a solution of the form
$$
y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
$$
were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It means find a solution of the form
$$
y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
$$
were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.
It means find a solution of the form
$$
y(x)=sum_n=0^infty a_nx^n,
$$
were you are supposed to find the coefficients $a_n$. To leave them in recursive form means that you do not need to find them explicitly, but to obtain a recurrence formula where $a_n$ is given in terms of $a_0,dots,a_n-1$.
answered yesterday


Julián Aguirre
64.3k23894
64.3k23894
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
add a comment |Â
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
Proving linear independence is easy for me. I will simply take the Wronskian and show that it does not equal to zero. But how would I go about finding y1,y2,y3. Shouldn't there at most be only two solutions? I'm lost at making my first step
– seekingalpha23
20 hours ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872742%2fpower-series-and-recursion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password