Prove that $lim_nto infty x_n = 0$ if $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert leq frac12 lvert x - y rvert$ , $f(0) = 0$ and $x_n = f(x_n-1)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ satisfies $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert leq frac12 lvert x - y rvert$ for all $x,y in mathbbR$, and $f(0) = 0$. Let $x_0 in mathbbR $ be arbitrary. Define $x_1 = f(x_0)$, $x_2 = f(x_1)$, etc. so that $x_n = f(x_n-1)$ for all $nin mathbbZ^+$. Prove that $lim_nto infty x_n = 0$.



I am aware that one of this means that the function $f$ is Lipschitz which implies that it is uniformly continuous.



This is my attempt at the proof:
Suppose $varepsilon > 0$.
We have
$$lvert x_n - 0 rvert = lvert f(x_n-1) - f(0) rvert leq frac12 lvert x_n-1 rvert.
$$



From uniform continuity, we can choose $delta >0$ such that $lvert x - y rvert < delta$ implies that $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert < varepsilon$.
I want to somehow use this information to find an $Nin mathbbZ^+$ such that $vert x_n - 0 rvert < varepsilon$ whenever $ngeq N$ but I'm stuck on how to finish.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ satisfies $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert leq frac12 lvert x - y rvert$ for all $x,y in mathbbR$, and $f(0) = 0$. Let $x_0 in mathbbR $ be arbitrary. Define $x_1 = f(x_0)$, $x_2 = f(x_1)$, etc. so that $x_n = f(x_n-1)$ for all $nin mathbbZ^+$. Prove that $lim_nto infty x_n = 0$.



    I am aware that one of this means that the function $f$ is Lipschitz which implies that it is uniformly continuous.



    This is my attempt at the proof:
    Suppose $varepsilon > 0$.
    We have
    $$lvert x_n - 0 rvert = lvert f(x_n-1) - f(0) rvert leq frac12 lvert x_n-1 rvert.
    $$



    From uniform continuity, we can choose $delta >0$ such that $lvert x - y rvert < delta$ implies that $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert < varepsilon$.
    I want to somehow use this information to find an $Nin mathbbZ^+$ such that $vert x_n - 0 rvert < varepsilon$ whenever $ngeq N$ but I'm stuck on how to finish.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ satisfies $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert leq frac12 lvert x - y rvert$ for all $x,y in mathbbR$, and $f(0) = 0$. Let $x_0 in mathbbR $ be arbitrary. Define $x_1 = f(x_0)$, $x_2 = f(x_1)$, etc. so that $x_n = f(x_n-1)$ for all $nin mathbbZ^+$. Prove that $lim_nto infty x_n = 0$.



      I am aware that one of this means that the function $f$ is Lipschitz which implies that it is uniformly continuous.



      This is my attempt at the proof:
      Suppose $varepsilon > 0$.
      We have
      $$lvert x_n - 0 rvert = lvert f(x_n-1) - f(0) rvert leq frac12 lvert x_n-1 rvert.
      $$



      From uniform continuity, we can choose $delta >0$ such that $lvert x - y rvert < delta$ implies that $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert < varepsilon$.
      I want to somehow use this information to find an $Nin mathbbZ^+$ such that $vert x_n - 0 rvert < varepsilon$ whenever $ngeq N$ but I'm stuck on how to finish.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Suppose $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ satisfies $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert leq frac12 lvert x - y rvert$ for all $x,y in mathbbR$, and $f(0) = 0$. Let $x_0 in mathbbR $ be arbitrary. Define $x_1 = f(x_0)$, $x_2 = f(x_1)$, etc. so that $x_n = f(x_n-1)$ for all $nin mathbbZ^+$. Prove that $lim_nto infty x_n = 0$.



      I am aware that one of this means that the function $f$ is Lipschitz which implies that it is uniformly continuous.



      This is my attempt at the proof:
      Suppose $varepsilon > 0$.
      We have
      $$lvert x_n - 0 rvert = lvert f(x_n-1) - f(0) rvert leq frac12 lvert x_n-1 rvert.
      $$



      From uniform continuity, we can choose $delta >0$ such that $lvert x - y rvert < delta$ implies that $lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert < varepsilon$.
      I want to somehow use this information to find an $Nin mathbbZ^+$ such that $vert x_n - 0 rvert < varepsilon$ whenever $ngeq N$ but I'm stuck on how to finish.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 22 at 2:35









      user100000000000000

      381313




      381313




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Why not iterate what you have? $$|x_n| leq frac12|x_n-1| leq frac12^2 |x_n-2| leq dots leq frac12^n |x_0|$$ Note $frac12^n to 0$ as $n to infty.$






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            This is more or less the proof of the Banach Fixed Point Theorem, but I'll include the argument here. Notice that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert = lvert f(x_n) - f(x_n-1) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x_n - x_n-1 rvert $$ and since this holds for all $n in mathbb Z^+$, we can use induction to see that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert le frac12^n lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert = frac C 2^n$$ where $C = lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert$ is a constant. Now fix $N in mathbb Z^+$, And note that for $m > n > N$, beginalign* lvert x_m - x_nrvert &= lvert (x_m - x_m-1) - (x_m-1 - x_m-2) - cdots - (x_n+1 - x_n) rvert \ &le sum^m-1_k=n lvert x_k+1 - x_k rvert\
            &le sum^m-1_k=n fracC2^k le sum^infty_k=N fracC2^k = fracC(1/2)^N1-(1/2) to 0,,,, text as Nto infty.
            endalign* This shows that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence and thus converges to some $x^* in mathbb R$. Now taking the limit on both sides of the equation and using continuity of $f$, we see that $$x_n+1 = f(x_n) ,,,,, implies ,,,,, x^* = f(x^*).$$ That is $x^*$ is a fixed point of $f$.



            Now suppose that for $x,y in mathbb R$, $$f(x) = x ,,,,,, text and ,,,,,, f(y) = y.$$ Then $$0 le lvert x - y rvert = lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x - y rvert$$ which shows that $lvert x - y rvert = 0$ so $x=y$. Thus $f$ has only one fixed point and so $f(x^*) = x^*$ implies that $x^* = 0$. Thus $x_nto 0.$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859042%2fprove-that-lim-n-to-infty-x-n-0-if-lvert-fx-fy-rvert-leq-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Why not iterate what you have? $$|x_n| leq frac12|x_n-1| leq frac12^2 |x_n-2| leq dots leq frac12^n |x_0|$$ Note $frac12^n to 0$ as $n to infty.$






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted










                Why not iterate what you have? $$|x_n| leq frac12|x_n-1| leq frac12^2 |x_n-2| leq dots leq frac12^n |x_0|$$ Note $frac12^n to 0$ as $n to infty.$






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Why not iterate what you have? $$|x_n| leq frac12|x_n-1| leq frac12^2 |x_n-2| leq dots leq frac12^n |x_0|$$ Note $frac12^n to 0$ as $n to infty.$






                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  Why not iterate what you have? $$|x_n| leq frac12|x_n-1| leq frac12^2 |x_n-2| leq dots leq frac12^n |x_0|$$ Note $frac12^n to 0$ as $n to infty.$







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 22 at 9:12









                  rtybase

                  8,85721433




                  8,85721433











                  answered Jul 22 at 3:00









                  Dzoooks

                  740214




                  740214




















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      This is more or less the proof of the Banach Fixed Point Theorem, but I'll include the argument here. Notice that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert = lvert f(x_n) - f(x_n-1) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x_n - x_n-1 rvert $$ and since this holds for all $n in mathbb Z^+$, we can use induction to see that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert le frac12^n lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert = frac C 2^n$$ where $C = lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert$ is a constant. Now fix $N in mathbb Z^+$, And note that for $m > n > N$, beginalign* lvert x_m - x_nrvert &= lvert (x_m - x_m-1) - (x_m-1 - x_m-2) - cdots - (x_n+1 - x_n) rvert \ &le sum^m-1_k=n lvert x_k+1 - x_k rvert\
                      &le sum^m-1_k=n fracC2^k le sum^infty_k=N fracC2^k = fracC(1/2)^N1-(1/2) to 0,,,, text as Nto infty.
                      endalign* This shows that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence and thus converges to some $x^* in mathbb R$. Now taking the limit on both sides of the equation and using continuity of $f$, we see that $$x_n+1 = f(x_n) ,,,,, implies ,,,,, x^* = f(x^*).$$ That is $x^*$ is a fixed point of $f$.



                      Now suppose that for $x,y in mathbb R$, $$f(x) = x ,,,,,, text and ,,,,,, f(y) = y.$$ Then $$0 le lvert x - y rvert = lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x - y rvert$$ which shows that $lvert x - y rvert = 0$ so $x=y$. Thus $f$ has only one fixed point and so $f(x^*) = x^*$ implies that $x^* = 0$. Thus $x_nto 0.$






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        -1
                        down vote













                        This is more or less the proof of the Banach Fixed Point Theorem, but I'll include the argument here. Notice that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert = lvert f(x_n) - f(x_n-1) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x_n - x_n-1 rvert $$ and since this holds for all $n in mathbb Z^+$, we can use induction to see that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert le frac12^n lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert = frac C 2^n$$ where $C = lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert$ is a constant. Now fix $N in mathbb Z^+$, And note that for $m > n > N$, beginalign* lvert x_m - x_nrvert &= lvert (x_m - x_m-1) - (x_m-1 - x_m-2) - cdots - (x_n+1 - x_n) rvert \ &le sum^m-1_k=n lvert x_k+1 - x_k rvert\
                        &le sum^m-1_k=n fracC2^k le sum^infty_k=N fracC2^k = fracC(1/2)^N1-(1/2) to 0,,,, text as Nto infty.
                        endalign* This shows that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence and thus converges to some $x^* in mathbb R$. Now taking the limit on both sides of the equation and using continuity of $f$, we see that $$x_n+1 = f(x_n) ,,,,, implies ,,,,, x^* = f(x^*).$$ That is $x^*$ is a fixed point of $f$.



                        Now suppose that for $x,y in mathbb R$, $$f(x) = x ,,,,,, text and ,,,,,, f(y) = y.$$ Then $$0 le lvert x - y rvert = lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x - y rvert$$ which shows that $lvert x - y rvert = 0$ so $x=y$. Thus $f$ has only one fixed point and so $f(x^*) = x^*$ implies that $x^* = 0$. Thus $x_nto 0.$






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          -1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          -1
                          down vote









                          This is more or less the proof of the Banach Fixed Point Theorem, but I'll include the argument here. Notice that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert = lvert f(x_n) - f(x_n-1) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x_n - x_n-1 rvert $$ and since this holds for all $n in mathbb Z^+$, we can use induction to see that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert le frac12^n lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert = frac C 2^n$$ where $C = lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert$ is a constant. Now fix $N in mathbb Z^+$, And note that for $m > n > N$, beginalign* lvert x_m - x_nrvert &= lvert (x_m - x_m-1) - (x_m-1 - x_m-2) - cdots - (x_n+1 - x_n) rvert \ &le sum^m-1_k=n lvert x_k+1 - x_k rvert\
                          &le sum^m-1_k=n fracC2^k le sum^infty_k=N fracC2^k = fracC(1/2)^N1-(1/2) to 0,,,, text as Nto infty.
                          endalign* This shows that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence and thus converges to some $x^* in mathbb R$. Now taking the limit on both sides of the equation and using continuity of $f$, we see that $$x_n+1 = f(x_n) ,,,,, implies ,,,,, x^* = f(x^*).$$ That is $x^*$ is a fixed point of $f$.



                          Now suppose that for $x,y in mathbb R$, $$f(x) = x ,,,,,, text and ,,,,,, f(y) = y.$$ Then $$0 le lvert x - y rvert = lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x - y rvert$$ which shows that $lvert x - y rvert = 0$ so $x=y$. Thus $f$ has only one fixed point and so $f(x^*) = x^*$ implies that $x^* = 0$. Thus $x_nto 0.$






                          share|cite|improve this answer













                          This is more or less the proof of the Banach Fixed Point Theorem, but I'll include the argument here. Notice that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert = lvert f(x_n) - f(x_n-1) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x_n - x_n-1 rvert $$ and since this holds for all $n in mathbb Z^+$, we can use induction to see that $$lvert x_n+1 - x_n rvert le frac12^n lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert = frac C 2^n$$ where $C = lvert f(x_1) - f(x_0) rvert$ is a constant. Now fix $N in mathbb Z^+$, And note that for $m > n > N$, beginalign* lvert x_m - x_nrvert &= lvert (x_m - x_m-1) - (x_m-1 - x_m-2) - cdots - (x_n+1 - x_n) rvert \ &le sum^m-1_k=n lvert x_k+1 - x_k rvert\
                          &le sum^m-1_k=n fracC2^k le sum^infty_k=N fracC2^k = fracC(1/2)^N1-(1/2) to 0,,,, text as Nto infty.
                          endalign* This shows that $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence and thus converges to some $x^* in mathbb R$. Now taking the limit on both sides of the equation and using continuity of $f$, we see that $$x_n+1 = f(x_n) ,,,,, implies ,,,,, x^* = f(x^*).$$ That is $x^*$ is a fixed point of $f$.



                          Now suppose that for $x,y in mathbb R$, $$f(x) = x ,,,,,, text and ,,,,,, f(y) = y.$$ Then $$0 le lvert x - y rvert = lvert f(x) - f(y) rvert le frac 1 2 lvert x - y rvert$$ which shows that $lvert x - y rvert = 0$ so $x=y$. Thus $f$ has only one fixed point and so $f(x^*) = x^*$ implies that $x^* = 0$. Thus $x_nto 0.$







                          share|cite|improve this answer













                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          answered Jul 22 at 3:01









                          User8128

                          10.2k1522




                          10.2k1522






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859042%2fprove-that-lim-n-to-infty-x-n-0-if-lvert-fx-fy-rvert-leq-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                              Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                              Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?