simple hyperbolic Diophantine equation [on hold]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How can we show that there are infinitely many integers $C$ such that the simple hyperbolic diophantine equation:
$$6xy ± x ± y = C$$ gives a non-integer solutions for $x, y$, except at $(0, ±C), (±C,0)$?



Some of these values of $C = 3,5,7,10,…$.







share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco 5 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496106/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2324324/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/550916/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416570/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/698021/…
    – Gerry Myerson
    yesterday














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How can we show that there are infinitely many integers $C$ such that the simple hyperbolic diophantine equation:
$$6xy ± x ± y = C$$ gives a non-integer solutions for $x, y$, except at $(0, ±C), (±C,0)$?



Some of these values of $C = 3,5,7,10,…$.







share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco 5 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496106/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2324324/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/550916/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416570/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/698021/…
    – Gerry Myerson
    yesterday












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











How can we show that there are infinitely many integers $C$ such that the simple hyperbolic diophantine equation:
$$6xy ± x ± y = C$$ gives a non-integer solutions for $x, y$, except at $(0, ±C), (±C,0)$?



Some of these values of $C = 3,5,7,10,…$.







share|cite|improve this question













How can we show that there are infinitely many integers $C$ such that the simple hyperbolic diophantine equation:
$$6xy ± x ± y = C$$ gives a non-integer solutions for $x, y$, except at $(0, ±C), (±C,0)$?



Some of these values of $C = 3,5,7,10,…$.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Suzet

2,023324




2,023324









asked yesterday









busy Ang

183




183




put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco 5 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco 5 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Jendrik Stelzner, Brahadeesh, José Carlos Santos, Taroccoesbrocco
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496106/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2324324/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/550916/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416570/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/698021/…
    – Gerry Myerson
    yesterday
















  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496106/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2324324/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/550916/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416570/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/698021/…
    – Gerry Myerson
    yesterday















math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496106/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2324324/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/550916/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416570/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/698021/…
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday




math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496106/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2324324/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/550916/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1416570/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/698021/…
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is OEIS sequence A002822 "Numbers n such that 6n-1, 6n+1 are twin primes". Thus, proving there are infinitely many of these numbers is equivalent to proving the twin prime conjecture.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • thank you very much for the feedback.
    – busy Ang
    yesterday

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is OEIS sequence A002822 "Numbers n such that 6n-1, 6n+1 are twin primes". Thus, proving there are infinitely many of these numbers is equivalent to proving the twin prime conjecture.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • thank you very much for the feedback.
    – busy Ang
    yesterday














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is OEIS sequence A002822 "Numbers n such that 6n-1, 6n+1 are twin primes". Thus, proving there are infinitely many of these numbers is equivalent to proving the twin prime conjecture.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • thank you very much for the feedback.
    – busy Ang
    yesterday












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






This is OEIS sequence A002822 "Numbers n such that 6n-1, 6n+1 are twin primes". Thus, proving there are infinitely many of these numbers is equivalent to proving the twin prime conjecture.






share|cite|improve this answer















This is OEIS sequence A002822 "Numbers n such that 6n-1, 6n+1 are twin primes". Thus, proving there are infinitely many of these numbers is equivalent to proving the twin prime conjecture.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited yesterday


























answered yesterday









Somos

10.8k1831




10.8k1831











  • thank you very much for the feedback.
    – busy Ang
    yesterday
















  • thank you very much for the feedback.
    – busy Ang
    yesterday















thank you very much for the feedback.
– busy Ang
yesterday




thank you very much for the feedback.
– busy Ang
yesterday


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?