sketch the region of integration for $int_0^2 int_0^x int_0^y f(x,y,z) ,dz,dy,dx$ [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
$$int_0^2 int_0^x int_0^y f(x,y,z) ,dz,dy,dx$$
From what I can understand that the region should be between planes $x=0$, $x=2$ and $y=0$, $y=x$ and $z=0$, $z=y$.
I am finding it very difficult to represent it on a piece of paper. Please advise.
integration multivariable-calculus
closed as off-topic by user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 26 at 7:41
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
$$int_0^2 int_0^x int_0^y f(x,y,z) ,dz,dy,dx$$
From what I can understand that the region should be between planes $x=0$, $x=2$ and $y=0$, $y=x$ and $z=0$, $z=y$.
I am finding it very difficult to represent it on a piece of paper. Please advise.
integration multivariable-calculus
closed as off-topic by user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 26 at 7:41
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco
If you at least have an idea, I recommend drawing it out and checking that the integration boundaries make sense for your surface. Wrong or right, I've found this helps to gain some geometric intuition for the problem (and if wrong, hopefully suggests a correction)
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jul 20 at 22:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
$$int_0^2 int_0^x int_0^y f(x,y,z) ,dz,dy,dx$$
From what I can understand that the region should be between planes $x=0$, $x=2$ and $y=0$, $y=x$ and $z=0$, $z=y$.
I am finding it very difficult to represent it on a piece of paper. Please advise.
integration multivariable-calculus
$$int_0^2 int_0^x int_0^y f(x,y,z) ,dz,dy,dx$$
From what I can understand that the region should be between planes $x=0$, $x=2$ and $y=0$, $y=x$ and $z=0$, $z=y$.
I am finding it very difficult to represent it on a piece of paper. Please advise.
integration multivariable-calculus
edited Jul 20 at 23:56
Community♦
1
1
asked Jul 20 at 22:33


thepanda
695
695
closed as off-topic by user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 26 at 7:41
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco
closed as off-topic by user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 26 at 7:41
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user21820, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Nils Matthes, Taroccoesbrocco
If you at least have an idea, I recommend drawing it out and checking that the integration boundaries make sense for your surface. Wrong or right, I've found this helps to gain some geometric intuition for the problem (and if wrong, hopefully suggests a correction)
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jul 20 at 22:42
add a comment |Â
If you at least have an idea, I recommend drawing it out and checking that the integration boundaries make sense for your surface. Wrong or right, I've found this helps to gain some geometric intuition for the problem (and if wrong, hopefully suggests a correction)
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jul 20 at 22:42
If you at least have an idea, I recommend drawing it out and checking that the integration boundaries make sense for your surface. Wrong or right, I've found this helps to gain some geometric intuition for the problem (and if wrong, hopefully suggests a correction)
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jul 20 at 22:42
If you at least have an idea, I recommend drawing it out and checking that the integration boundaries make sense for your surface. Wrong or right, I've found this helps to gain some geometric intuition for the problem (and if wrong, hopefully suggests a correction)
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jul 20 at 22:42
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes you are right the limit to consider are
- $0le x le 2$ varing along $x$ axis
- $0le y le x$ varing in $x-y$ plane between $x$ axis and the line $y=x$
- $0le z le y$ varing in space between $x-y$ plane and the plane $z=y$
A good way to vizualize without a 3D plot program is try to make at first some sketch in the $x-y$, $y-z$, $x-z$ planes and then try to vizualize the region in 3D.
Here below an example
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Here is the integration region:
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Drawing cross-sections may be beneficial.
$x=0, x=2$ and $y=0, y=x$ define a right triangular prism, infinite in the $z$-direction. Draw its cross-section in the $z=c$ plane (I'd probably consider $c=0$ here for the $xy$-plane).
Now consider the intersections with $z=0$, if you haven't done so, and $z=y$. The former gives a right triangular base, and the latter cuts through your prism at a $pi/4$ angle.
You could consider drawing the cross-section from another perspective as well - say choosing three projections flattening one of the cartesian components.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes you are right the limit to consider are
- $0le x le 2$ varing along $x$ axis
- $0le y le x$ varing in $x-y$ plane between $x$ axis and the line $y=x$
- $0le z le y$ varing in space between $x-y$ plane and the plane $z=y$
A good way to vizualize without a 3D plot program is try to make at first some sketch in the $x-y$, $y-z$, $x-z$ planes and then try to vizualize the region in 3D.
Here below an example
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes you are right the limit to consider are
- $0le x le 2$ varing along $x$ axis
- $0le y le x$ varing in $x-y$ plane between $x$ axis and the line $y=x$
- $0le z le y$ varing in space between $x-y$ plane and the plane $z=y$
A good way to vizualize without a 3D plot program is try to make at first some sketch in the $x-y$, $y-z$, $x-z$ planes and then try to vizualize the region in 3D.
Here below an example
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes you are right the limit to consider are
- $0le x le 2$ varing along $x$ axis
- $0le y le x$ varing in $x-y$ plane between $x$ axis and the line $y=x$
- $0le z le y$ varing in space between $x-y$ plane and the plane $z=y$
A good way to vizualize without a 3D plot program is try to make at first some sketch in the $x-y$, $y-z$, $x-z$ planes and then try to vizualize the region in 3D.
Here below an example
Yes you are right the limit to consider are
- $0le x le 2$ varing along $x$ axis
- $0le y le x$ varing in $x-y$ plane between $x$ axis and the line $y=x$
- $0le z le y$ varing in space between $x-y$ plane and the plane $z=y$
A good way to vizualize without a 3D plot program is try to make at first some sketch in the $x-y$, $y-z$, $x-z$ planes and then try to vizualize the region in 3D.
Here below an example
edited Jul 20 at 23:15
answered Jul 20 at 22:49
gimusi
65.4k73584
65.4k73584
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Here is the integration region:
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Here is the integration region:
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Here is the integration region:
Here is the integration region:
answered Jul 20 at 22:44


David G. Stork
7,6652929
7,6652929
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
add a comment |Â
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Thanks a lot! but I am solving a question from the book and I have to answer it on a paper. I don't know how to represent it on a paper.
– thepanda
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
Sketch my figure with pen and paper. Mark the corner points and simply draw straight lines between them.
– David G. Stork
Jul 20 at 22:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Drawing cross-sections may be beneficial.
$x=0, x=2$ and $y=0, y=x$ define a right triangular prism, infinite in the $z$-direction. Draw its cross-section in the $z=c$ plane (I'd probably consider $c=0$ here for the $xy$-plane).
Now consider the intersections with $z=0$, if you haven't done so, and $z=y$. The former gives a right triangular base, and the latter cuts through your prism at a $pi/4$ angle.
You could consider drawing the cross-section from another perspective as well - say choosing three projections flattening one of the cartesian components.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Drawing cross-sections may be beneficial.
$x=0, x=2$ and $y=0, y=x$ define a right triangular prism, infinite in the $z$-direction. Draw its cross-section in the $z=c$ plane (I'd probably consider $c=0$ here for the $xy$-plane).
Now consider the intersections with $z=0$, if you haven't done so, and $z=y$. The former gives a right triangular base, and the latter cuts through your prism at a $pi/4$ angle.
You could consider drawing the cross-section from another perspective as well - say choosing three projections flattening one of the cartesian components.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Drawing cross-sections may be beneficial.
$x=0, x=2$ and $y=0, y=x$ define a right triangular prism, infinite in the $z$-direction. Draw its cross-section in the $z=c$ plane (I'd probably consider $c=0$ here for the $xy$-plane).
Now consider the intersections with $z=0$, if you haven't done so, and $z=y$. The former gives a right triangular base, and the latter cuts through your prism at a $pi/4$ angle.
You could consider drawing the cross-section from another perspective as well - say choosing three projections flattening one of the cartesian components.
Drawing cross-sections may be beneficial.
$x=0, x=2$ and $y=0, y=x$ define a right triangular prism, infinite in the $z$-direction. Draw its cross-section in the $z=c$ plane (I'd probably consider $c=0$ here for the $xy$-plane).
Now consider the intersections with $z=0$, if you haven't done so, and $z=y$. The former gives a right triangular base, and the latter cuts through your prism at a $pi/4$ angle.
You could consider drawing the cross-section from another perspective as well - say choosing three projections flattening one of the cartesian components.
answered Jul 20 at 22:51
zahbaz
7,52721636
7,52721636
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
If you at least have an idea, I recommend drawing it out and checking that the integration boundaries make sense for your surface. Wrong or right, I've found this helps to gain some geometric intuition for the problem (and if wrong, hopefully suggests a correction)
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jul 20 at 22:42