Solution to systems of linear equations formed by linear combinations of another system of linear equations.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have recently began reading a text on linear algebra in preparation the upcoming fall semester. This is the first time I've looked at linear algebra proper in a few years. Early on I was reading about some basic concepts regarding systems of linear equations. In particular you can take a given system of linear equations call it system A and if we form linear combinations out of these equations we can construct another system of linear equations call it system B. Clearly any solution to system A is a solution to system B.
My question is that the text stated that there may be cases where a solution to system B may not be a solution to system A, but as I have been writing out simple systems to try to generate a case where this happens I have been unable to do so. If there is a trivial case to this then it escapes me. If someone could help me understand why this is so obvious and if there are trivial cases give me an example it would greatly help.
Also please note that I understand that in the case that all the solutions of B are solutions of A then we call the systems equivalent.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have recently began reading a text on linear algebra in preparation the upcoming fall semester. This is the first time I've looked at linear algebra proper in a few years. Early on I was reading about some basic concepts regarding systems of linear equations. In particular you can take a given system of linear equations call it system A and if we form linear combinations out of these equations we can construct another system of linear equations call it system B. Clearly any solution to system A is a solution to system B.
My question is that the text stated that there may be cases where a solution to system B may not be a solution to system A, but as I have been writing out simple systems to try to generate a case where this happens I have been unable to do so. If there is a trivial case to this then it escapes me. If someone could help me understand why this is so obvious and if there are trivial cases give me an example it would greatly help.
Also please note that I understand that in the case that all the solutions of B are solutions of A then we call the systems equivalent.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have recently began reading a text on linear algebra in preparation the upcoming fall semester. This is the first time I've looked at linear algebra proper in a few years. Early on I was reading about some basic concepts regarding systems of linear equations. In particular you can take a given system of linear equations call it system A and if we form linear combinations out of these equations we can construct another system of linear equations call it system B. Clearly any solution to system A is a solution to system B.
My question is that the text stated that there may be cases where a solution to system B may not be a solution to system A, but as I have been writing out simple systems to try to generate a case where this happens I have been unable to do so. If there is a trivial case to this then it escapes me. If someone could help me understand why this is so obvious and if there are trivial cases give me an example it would greatly help.
Also please note that I understand that in the case that all the solutions of B are solutions of A then we call the systems equivalent.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
I have recently began reading a text on linear algebra in preparation the upcoming fall semester. This is the first time I've looked at linear algebra proper in a few years. Early on I was reading about some basic concepts regarding systems of linear equations. In particular you can take a given system of linear equations call it system A and if we form linear combinations out of these equations we can construct another system of linear equations call it system B. Clearly any solution to system A is a solution to system B.
My question is that the text stated that there may be cases where a solution to system B may not be a solution to system A, but as I have been writing out simple systems to try to generate a case where this happens I have been unable to do so. If there is a trivial case to this then it escapes me. If someone could help me understand why this is so obvious and if there are trivial cases give me an example it would greatly help.
Also please note that I understand that in the case that all the solutions of B are solutions of A then we call the systems equivalent.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
asked Jul 22 at 3:09


Christian Harris
191111
191111
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Consider the equations
$$x+y=1tag1$$
$$x-y=1tag2$$
which has as unique solution $x=1,y=0$. If we take the linear equation $2(1)+(2)$ (twice of first equation plus second) and $4(1)+2(2)$ we get
$$3x+y=3$$
$$6x+2y=6$$
which has an infinite number of solutions beside $x=1,y=0$, one of which is $x=0,y=3$.
Such additional solutions, at least in two variables, arise when some of the new equations are multiples of each other, so that one degree of specification is lost. Later in the course you're taking I suppose that matrices will be introduced, and it can be shown that such generation of additional solutions arises when the determinant of the matrix of linear combinations – $beginbmatrix2&1\4&2endbmatrix$ here – is zero.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Consider the equations
$$x+y=1tag1$$
$$x-y=1tag2$$
which has as unique solution $x=1,y=0$. If we take the linear equation $2(1)+(2)$ (twice of first equation plus second) and $4(1)+2(2)$ we get
$$3x+y=3$$
$$6x+2y=6$$
which has an infinite number of solutions beside $x=1,y=0$, one of which is $x=0,y=3$.
Such additional solutions, at least in two variables, arise when some of the new equations are multiples of each other, so that one degree of specification is lost. Later in the course you're taking I suppose that matrices will be introduced, and it can be shown that such generation of additional solutions arises when the determinant of the matrix of linear combinations – $beginbmatrix2&1\4&2endbmatrix$ here – is zero.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Consider the equations
$$x+y=1tag1$$
$$x-y=1tag2$$
which has as unique solution $x=1,y=0$. If we take the linear equation $2(1)+(2)$ (twice of first equation plus second) and $4(1)+2(2)$ we get
$$3x+y=3$$
$$6x+2y=6$$
which has an infinite number of solutions beside $x=1,y=0$, one of which is $x=0,y=3$.
Such additional solutions, at least in two variables, arise when some of the new equations are multiples of each other, so that one degree of specification is lost. Later in the course you're taking I suppose that matrices will be introduced, and it can be shown that such generation of additional solutions arises when the determinant of the matrix of linear combinations – $beginbmatrix2&1\4&2endbmatrix$ here – is zero.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Consider the equations
$$x+y=1tag1$$
$$x-y=1tag2$$
which has as unique solution $x=1,y=0$. If we take the linear equation $2(1)+(2)$ (twice of first equation plus second) and $4(1)+2(2)$ we get
$$3x+y=3$$
$$6x+2y=6$$
which has an infinite number of solutions beside $x=1,y=0$, one of which is $x=0,y=3$.
Such additional solutions, at least in two variables, arise when some of the new equations are multiples of each other, so that one degree of specification is lost. Later in the course you're taking I suppose that matrices will be introduced, and it can be shown that such generation of additional solutions arises when the determinant of the matrix of linear combinations – $beginbmatrix2&1\4&2endbmatrix$ here – is zero.
Consider the equations
$$x+y=1tag1$$
$$x-y=1tag2$$
which has as unique solution $x=1,y=0$. If we take the linear equation $2(1)+(2)$ (twice of first equation plus second) and $4(1)+2(2)$ we get
$$3x+y=3$$
$$6x+2y=6$$
which has an infinite number of solutions beside $x=1,y=0$, one of which is $x=0,y=3$.
Such additional solutions, at least in two variables, arise when some of the new equations are multiples of each other, so that one degree of specification is lost. Later in the course you're taking I suppose that matrices will be introduced, and it can be shown that such generation of additional solutions arises when the determinant of the matrix of linear combinations – $beginbmatrix2&1\4&2endbmatrix$ here – is zero.
answered Jul 22 at 3:26


Parcly Taxel
33.6k136588
33.6k136588
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859064%2fsolution-to-systems-of-linear-equations-formed-by-linear-combinations-of-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password