Sum of square roots of complex numbers
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is this always true?
$z^1/2+z^1/2=2z^1/2$
I said that it isn't in the multiform case but I want to justify this better (not just words).
complex-numbers radicals
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is this always true?
$z^1/2+z^1/2=2z^1/2$
I said that it isn't in the multiform case but I want to justify this better (not just words).
complex-numbers radicals
1
Before using the word “true†in this context, you should define $x^1/2$ first.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 2 at 14:53
1
If you are sensible enough to take the same square root each time...
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 2 at 14:53
Why's necessary? It's true if you define the square root but I'mt trying to say that is false if you don't define it.
– Verónica
Aug 2 at 15:12
@Verónica The square root function can be a bit ambiguous since you could be talking about $+sqrtz$ or $-sqrtz$, but this is confounded even more since in the complex plane, $a^b=exp(bln(a)+2pi n)$. So without defining exactly what you mean (or exactly what branch cut you mean), there's no way of knowing whether your equation holds.
– Jam
Aug 2 at 15:14
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is this always true?
$z^1/2+z^1/2=2z^1/2$
I said that it isn't in the multiform case but I want to justify this better (not just words).
complex-numbers radicals
Is this always true?
$z^1/2+z^1/2=2z^1/2$
I said that it isn't in the multiform case but I want to justify this better (not just words).
complex-numbers radicals
edited Aug 2 at 14:53


José Carlos Santos
112k1696172
112k1696172
asked Aug 2 at 14:52


Verónica
235
235
1
Before using the word “true†in this context, you should define $x^1/2$ first.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 2 at 14:53
1
If you are sensible enough to take the same square root each time...
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 2 at 14:53
Why's necessary? It's true if you define the square root but I'mt trying to say that is false if you don't define it.
– Verónica
Aug 2 at 15:12
@Verónica The square root function can be a bit ambiguous since you could be talking about $+sqrtz$ or $-sqrtz$, but this is confounded even more since in the complex plane, $a^b=exp(bln(a)+2pi n)$. So without defining exactly what you mean (or exactly what branch cut you mean), there's no way of knowing whether your equation holds.
– Jam
Aug 2 at 15:14
add a comment |Â
1
Before using the word “true†in this context, you should define $x^1/2$ first.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 2 at 14:53
1
If you are sensible enough to take the same square root each time...
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 2 at 14:53
Why's necessary? It's true if you define the square root but I'mt trying to say that is false if you don't define it.
– Verónica
Aug 2 at 15:12
@Verónica The square root function can be a bit ambiguous since you could be talking about $+sqrtz$ or $-sqrtz$, but this is confounded even more since in the complex plane, $a^b=exp(bln(a)+2pi n)$. So without defining exactly what you mean (or exactly what branch cut you mean), there's no way of knowing whether your equation holds.
– Jam
Aug 2 at 15:14
1
1
Before using the word “true†in this context, you should define $x^1/2$ first.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 2 at 14:53
Before using the word “true†in this context, you should define $x^1/2$ first.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 2 at 14:53
1
1
If you are sensible enough to take the same square root each time...
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 2 at 14:53
If you are sensible enough to take the same square root each time...
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 2 at 14:53
Why's necessary? It's true if you define the square root but I'mt trying to say that is false if you don't define it.
– Verónica
Aug 2 at 15:12
Why's necessary? It's true if you define the square root but I'mt trying to say that is false if you don't define it.
– Verónica
Aug 2 at 15:12
@Verónica The square root function can be a bit ambiguous since you could be talking about $+sqrtz$ or $-sqrtz$, but this is confounded even more since in the complex plane, $a^b=exp(bln(a)+2pi n)$. So without defining exactly what you mean (or exactly what branch cut you mean), there's no way of knowing whether your equation holds.
– Jam
Aug 2 at 15:14
@Verónica The square root function can be a bit ambiguous since you could be talking about $+sqrtz$ or $-sqrtz$, but this is confounded even more since in the complex plane, $a^b=exp(bln(a)+2pi n)$. So without defining exactly what you mean (or exactly what branch cut you mean), there's no way of knowing whether your equation holds.
– Jam
Aug 2 at 15:14
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For $zneq 0$ we have $2$ distinct solutions
$$z^frac12=wimplies w_1^2=zquad w_2^2=z$$
and for any solution of course
$$w_i+w_i=2w_i$$
but
$$w_1+w_2=0$$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For $zneq 0$ we have $2$ distinct solutions
$$z^frac12=wimplies w_1^2=zquad w_2^2=z$$
and for any solution of course
$$w_i+w_i=2w_i$$
but
$$w_1+w_2=0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
For $zneq 0$ we have $2$ distinct solutions
$$z^frac12=wimplies w_1^2=zquad w_2^2=z$$
and for any solution of course
$$w_i+w_i=2w_i$$
but
$$w_1+w_2=0$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
For $zneq 0$ we have $2$ distinct solutions
$$z^frac12=wimplies w_1^2=zquad w_2^2=z$$
and for any solution of course
$$w_i+w_i=2w_i$$
but
$$w_1+w_2=0$$
For $zneq 0$ we have $2$ distinct solutions
$$z^frac12=wimplies w_1^2=zquad w_2^2=z$$
and for any solution of course
$$w_i+w_i=2w_i$$
but
$$w_1+w_2=0$$
answered Aug 2 at 15:12
gimusi
63.8k73480
63.8k73480
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870149%2fsum-of-square-roots-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Before using the word “true†in this context, you should define $x^1/2$ first.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 2 at 14:53
1
If you are sensible enough to take the same square root each time...
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 2 at 14:53
Why's necessary? It's true if you define the square root but I'mt trying to say that is false if you don't define it.
– Verónica
Aug 2 at 15:12
@Verónica The square root function can be a bit ambiguous since you could be talking about $+sqrtz$ or $-sqrtz$, but this is confounded even more since in the complex plane, $a^b=exp(bln(a)+2pi n)$. So without defining exactly what you mean (or exactly what branch cut you mean), there's no way of knowing whether your equation holds.
– Jam
Aug 2 at 15:14