The product of perfectly normal compact Hausdorff spaces is perfectly normal

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Question: Is it true that if $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space that is perfectly normal, then $X times X$ is also perfectly normal?



Recall that a topological space $X$ is called perfectly normal if and only if $X$ is normal and every closed set $A subseteq X$ is a $G_delta$-set ($A$ is a $G_delta$-set if and only if it is the intersection of countably many open sets of $X$).



Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. In particular, this means that $X$ is compact. Consequently, $X times X$ is compact and Hausdorff. Thus, to show that $X times X$ is perfectly normal, it is enough to show that each closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set. Thus, my question is really the following:



Question*: Is it true that If $X$ is a compact Hausdorff and perfectly normal space, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set?



If this turns out to be false, that's too bad. However, if this turns out to be true, then I have $2$ follow-up questions, where we get rid of some assumptions regarding compactness or Hausdorffness.



Bonus question 1: If $X$ is a topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



Bonus question 2: If $X$ is a Hausdorff topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



As always, any help with any of the above questions will be greatly appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Question: Is it true that if $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space that is perfectly normal, then $X times X$ is also perfectly normal?



    Recall that a topological space $X$ is called perfectly normal if and only if $X$ is normal and every closed set $A subseteq X$ is a $G_delta$-set ($A$ is a $G_delta$-set if and only if it is the intersection of countably many open sets of $X$).



    Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. In particular, this means that $X$ is compact. Consequently, $X times X$ is compact and Hausdorff. Thus, to show that $X times X$ is perfectly normal, it is enough to show that each closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set. Thus, my question is really the following:



    Question*: Is it true that If $X$ is a compact Hausdorff and perfectly normal space, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set?



    If this turns out to be false, that's too bad. However, if this turns out to be true, then I have $2$ follow-up questions, where we get rid of some assumptions regarding compactness or Hausdorffness.



    Bonus question 1: If $X$ is a topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



    Bonus question 2: If $X$ is a Hausdorff topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



    As always, any help with any of the above questions will be greatly appreciated.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Question: Is it true that if $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space that is perfectly normal, then $X times X$ is also perfectly normal?



      Recall that a topological space $X$ is called perfectly normal if and only if $X$ is normal and every closed set $A subseteq X$ is a $G_delta$-set ($A$ is a $G_delta$-set if and only if it is the intersection of countably many open sets of $X$).



      Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. In particular, this means that $X$ is compact. Consequently, $X times X$ is compact and Hausdorff. Thus, to show that $X times X$ is perfectly normal, it is enough to show that each closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set. Thus, my question is really the following:



      Question*: Is it true that If $X$ is a compact Hausdorff and perfectly normal space, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set?



      If this turns out to be false, that's too bad. However, if this turns out to be true, then I have $2$ follow-up questions, where we get rid of some assumptions regarding compactness or Hausdorffness.



      Bonus question 1: If $X$ is a topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



      Bonus question 2: If $X$ is a Hausdorff topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



      As always, any help with any of the above questions will be greatly appreciated.







      share|cite|improve this question













      Question: Is it true that if $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space that is perfectly normal, then $X times X$ is also perfectly normal?



      Recall that a topological space $X$ is called perfectly normal if and only if $X$ is normal and every closed set $A subseteq X$ is a $G_delta$-set ($A$ is a $G_delta$-set if and only if it is the intersection of countably many open sets of $X$).



      Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. In particular, this means that $X$ is compact. Consequently, $X times X$ is compact and Hausdorff. Thus, to show that $X times X$ is perfectly normal, it is enough to show that each closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set. Thus, my question is really the following:



      Question*: Is it true that If $X$ is a compact Hausdorff and perfectly normal space, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set?



      If this turns out to be false, that's too bad. However, if this turns out to be true, then I have $2$ follow-up questions, where we get rid of some assumptions regarding compactness or Hausdorffness.



      Bonus question 1: If $X$ is a topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



      Bonus question 2: If $X$ is a Hausdorff topological space such that every closed set is a $G_delta$-set, then every closed set in $X times X$ is a $G_delta$-set.



      As always, any help with any of the above questions will be greatly appreciated.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago
























      asked 2 days ago









      Pawel

      2,780820




      2,780820




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          The answer is "no". This follows from Corollary 2 of



          Katětov, Miroslav. "Complete normality of Cartesian products." Fundamenta Mathematicae 35.1 (1948): 271-274.



          See http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm35/fm35125.pdf.



          Assume it were true that for any perfectly normal compact Hausdorff space $X$ also $X times X$ is perfectly normal. Then also $X times X times X times X$ would be perfectly normal, hence also $Y = X times X times X$ because it embeds into $X times X times X times X$. Since perfectly normal spaces are heritarily normal (which is denoted as "completely normal" in the above paper), Corollary 2 implies that $X$ is metrizable.



          In other words, if $mathcalP$ is a class of perfectly normal compact Hausdorff spaces such that



          $$(ast) phantomx X in mathcalP Rightarrow X times X in mathcalP$$



          then $mathcalP$ is contained in the class $mathcalCM$ of compact metrizable spaces. In fact, $mathcalCM$ is the biggest class having property $(ast)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872102%2fthe-product-of-perfectly-normal-compact-hausdorff-spaces-is-perfectly-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            The answer is "no". This follows from Corollary 2 of



            Katětov, Miroslav. "Complete normality of Cartesian products." Fundamenta Mathematicae 35.1 (1948): 271-274.



            See http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm35/fm35125.pdf.



            Assume it were true that for any perfectly normal compact Hausdorff space $X$ also $X times X$ is perfectly normal. Then also $X times X times X times X$ would be perfectly normal, hence also $Y = X times X times X$ because it embeds into $X times X times X times X$. Since perfectly normal spaces are heritarily normal (which is denoted as "completely normal" in the above paper), Corollary 2 implies that $X$ is metrizable.



            In other words, if $mathcalP$ is a class of perfectly normal compact Hausdorff spaces such that



            $$(ast) phantomx X in mathcalP Rightarrow X times X in mathcalP$$



            then $mathcalP$ is contained in the class $mathcalCM$ of compact metrizable spaces. In fact, $mathcalCM$ is the biggest class having property $(ast)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              The answer is "no". This follows from Corollary 2 of



              Katětov, Miroslav. "Complete normality of Cartesian products." Fundamenta Mathematicae 35.1 (1948): 271-274.



              See http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm35/fm35125.pdf.



              Assume it were true that for any perfectly normal compact Hausdorff space $X$ also $X times X$ is perfectly normal. Then also $X times X times X times X$ would be perfectly normal, hence also $Y = X times X times X$ because it embeds into $X times X times X times X$. Since perfectly normal spaces are heritarily normal (which is denoted as "completely normal" in the above paper), Corollary 2 implies that $X$ is metrizable.



              In other words, if $mathcalP$ is a class of perfectly normal compact Hausdorff spaces such that



              $$(ast) phantomx X in mathcalP Rightarrow X times X in mathcalP$$



              then $mathcalP$ is contained in the class $mathcalCM$ of compact metrizable spaces. In fact, $mathcalCM$ is the biggest class having property $(ast)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                The answer is "no". This follows from Corollary 2 of



                Katětov, Miroslav. "Complete normality of Cartesian products." Fundamenta Mathematicae 35.1 (1948): 271-274.



                See http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm35/fm35125.pdf.



                Assume it were true that for any perfectly normal compact Hausdorff space $X$ also $X times X$ is perfectly normal. Then also $X times X times X times X$ would be perfectly normal, hence also $Y = X times X times X$ because it embeds into $X times X times X times X$. Since perfectly normal spaces are heritarily normal (which is denoted as "completely normal" in the above paper), Corollary 2 implies that $X$ is metrizable.



                In other words, if $mathcalP$ is a class of perfectly normal compact Hausdorff spaces such that



                $$(ast) phantomx X in mathcalP Rightarrow X times X in mathcalP$$



                then $mathcalP$ is contained in the class $mathcalCM$ of compact metrizable spaces. In fact, $mathcalCM$ is the biggest class having property $(ast)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer















                The answer is "no". This follows from Corollary 2 of



                Katětov, Miroslav. "Complete normality of Cartesian products." Fundamenta Mathematicae 35.1 (1948): 271-274.



                See http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm35/fm35125.pdf.



                Assume it were true that for any perfectly normal compact Hausdorff space $X$ also $X times X$ is perfectly normal. Then also $X times X times X times X$ would be perfectly normal, hence also $Y = X times X times X$ because it embeds into $X times X times X times X$. Since perfectly normal spaces are heritarily normal (which is denoted as "completely normal" in the above paper), Corollary 2 implies that $X$ is metrizable.



                In other words, if $mathcalP$ is a class of perfectly normal compact Hausdorff spaces such that



                $$(ast) phantomx X in mathcalP Rightarrow X times X in mathcalP$$



                then $mathcalP$ is contained in the class $mathcalCM$ of compact metrizable spaces. In fact, $mathcalCM$ is the biggest class having property $(ast)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer















                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 20 hours ago


























                answered yesterday









                Paul Frost

                3,393320




                3,393320






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872102%2fthe-product-of-perfectly-normal-compact-hausdorff-spaces-is-perfectly-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?