Why can the Cholesky decomposition be used to invert non-Hermitian matrices?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The Wikipedia article and the paper it refers to have a blurb on it, but I haven't be able to find an explanation for this. More specifically, why does multiplying the transpose of the original matrix and the inverse of its square equal the inverse of the original matrix?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Cholesky decomposition leads to upper and lower triangular matrices, which are easy to invert.
    – nicomezi
    Jul 26 at 9:09






  • 1




    If $B$ is invertible then so is $BB^*$, and $B^*(BB^*)^-1=B^*(B^*)^-1B^-1=B^-1$.
    – Rahul
    Jul 26 at 9:28















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The Wikipedia article and the paper it refers to have a blurb on it, but I haven't be able to find an explanation for this. More specifically, why does multiplying the transpose of the original matrix and the inverse of its square equal the inverse of the original matrix?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Cholesky decomposition leads to upper and lower triangular matrices, which are easy to invert.
    – nicomezi
    Jul 26 at 9:09






  • 1




    If $B$ is invertible then so is $BB^*$, and $B^*(BB^*)^-1=B^*(B^*)^-1B^-1=B^-1$.
    – Rahul
    Jul 26 at 9:28













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











The Wikipedia article and the paper it refers to have a blurb on it, but I haven't be able to find an explanation for this. More specifically, why does multiplying the transpose of the original matrix and the inverse of its square equal the inverse of the original matrix?







share|cite|improve this question













The Wikipedia article and the paper it refers to have a blurb on it, but I haven't be able to find an explanation for this. More specifically, why does multiplying the transpose of the original matrix and the inverse of its square equal the inverse of the original matrix?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 26 at 9:09









Rodrigo de Azevedo

12.5k41751




12.5k41751









asked Jul 26 at 9:03









Marko Grdinic

1369




1369











  • Cholesky decomposition leads to upper and lower triangular matrices, which are easy to invert.
    – nicomezi
    Jul 26 at 9:09






  • 1




    If $B$ is invertible then so is $BB^*$, and $B^*(BB^*)^-1=B^*(B^*)^-1B^-1=B^-1$.
    – Rahul
    Jul 26 at 9:28

















  • Cholesky decomposition leads to upper and lower triangular matrices, which are easy to invert.
    – nicomezi
    Jul 26 at 9:09






  • 1




    If $B$ is invertible then so is $BB^*$, and $B^*(BB^*)^-1=B^*(B^*)^-1B^-1=B^-1$.
    – Rahul
    Jul 26 at 9:28
















Cholesky decomposition leads to upper and lower triangular matrices, which are easy to invert.
– nicomezi
Jul 26 at 9:09




Cholesky decomposition leads to upper and lower triangular matrices, which are easy to invert.
– nicomezi
Jul 26 at 9:09




1




1




If $B$ is invertible then so is $BB^*$, and $B^*(BB^*)^-1=B^*(B^*)^-1B^-1=B^-1$.
– Rahul
Jul 26 at 9:28





If $B$ is invertible then so is $BB^*$, and $B^*(BB^*)^-1=B^*(B^*)^-1B^-1=B^-1$.
– Rahul
Jul 26 at 9:28
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863227%2fwhy-can-the-cholesky-decomposition-be-used-to-invert-non-hermitian-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863227%2fwhy-can-the-cholesky-decomposition-be-used-to-invert-non-hermitian-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?